A significant proportion of cancer patients use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) along with conventional therapies (CT), whereas a smaller proportion delay or defer CT in favor of CAM. Previous studies exploring CAM use among cancer patients in the Middle East region have shown discrepant results. This study investigates the prevalence and pattern of CAM use by Saudi cancer patients. It also discusses the possible benefits and harm related to CAM use by cancer patients, and it explores the beliefs patients hold and their transparency with health care providers regarding their CAM use. A cross-sectional study was conducted in oncology wards and outpatient clinics by using face-to-face interviews with the participants. A total of 156 patients with a median age of 50 years (18–84) participated in the study. The prevalence of CAM use was 69.9%; the most prominent types of CAM were those of a religious nature, such as supplication (95.4%), Quran recitation (88.1%), consuming Zamzam water (84.4%), and water upon which the Quran has been read (63.3%). Drinking camel milk was reported by 24.1% of CAM users, whereas camel urine was consumed by 15.7%. A variety of reasons were given for CAM use: 75% reported that they were using CAM to treat cancer, enhance mood (18.3%),control pain (11.9%), enhance the immune system (11%),increase physical fitness (6.4%), and improve appetite (4.6%). Thirty percent of CAM users had discussed the issue with their doctors; only 7.7% had done so with their nurses. The use of CAM, including camel products, is highly prevalent among cancer patients in the Middle East, but these patients do not necessarily divulge their CAM use to their treating physicians and nurses. Although CAM use can be beneficial, some can be very harmful, especially for cancer patients. Association is known between camel products and brucellosis and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). Both can lead to tremendous morbidity in immune-compromised patients. Doctor–patient communication regarding CAM use is of paramount importance in cancer care.

Depression and anxiety in patients with hematological malignancies, prevalence, and associated factors

The prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains poor. Among 180 patients, the median age was 53 (14-88) years. The overall 2-year disease free survival (DFS) was 28.6% (+/- 3.4), 47.7% (+/- 6.6%) for ≤ 40, 23.6% (+/- 5.8%) for 41-60 and 11.7% (+/- 4.2%) for ≥61 (p< 0.0001). The overall 2-year survival (OS) was 45.3% (+/- 3.8%), 78.6% (+/- 5.5%) for ≤40, 43.5% (+/- 6.9%) for 41-60 and 15.8% (+/- 4.8%) for ≥61 (p< 0.0001). Induction outcome of ≥61 was best in high dose chemotherapy (HDC) group (p < 0.0001). Only those ≤40 had durable DFS and OS. HDC appears to improve the outcome of older AML patients.

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a subtype of BCR-ABL1 negative myeloproliferative neoplasm. Its characteristic features include clonal myeloproliferation, dysregulation of kinase signaling pathway, abnormal release of cytokines leading to fibrosis in the bone marrow, osteosclerosis, and extramedullary hematopoiesis. Approximately 20% of deaths occur because of disease progression, but death may also result occur because of cardiovascular complications or as a consequence of either infection or bleeding. The only and curative option for PMF is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT); however, the Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib is highly effective in reducing constitutional symptoms and spleen volume, and has been found to improve survival. Ruxolitinib decreases the activity of type I T-helper cells, leading to decreased release of cytokines including tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1 (IL-1), IL- 6, interferon-γ, and production of IL-12, which can be a risk factor for opportunistic infections. In this report, we describe three cases of tuberculosis reactivation shortly after initiation of ruxolitinib therapy followed by a literature review.