Since 2014, American states have had the option to expand their Medicaid programs as part of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which was signed into law by former President Barack H. Obama in 2010. Emerging research has found that Medicaid expansion has had a significant impact on patients with cancer, who often face significant financial barriers to receiving the care they need. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive examination of the research conducted thus far on the impact of Medicaid expansion on patients with cancer. We begin with a discussion of the history of Medicaid expansion and the key features of the ACA that facilitated it. We then review the literature, analyzing studies that have investigated the impact of Medicaid expansion on cancer patients in terms of access to care, quality of care, and health outcomes. Our findings suggest that Medicaid expansion has had a positive impact on patients with cancer in a number of ways. Patients in expansion states are more likely to receive timely cancer screening and diagnoses, and are more likely to receive appropriate cancer-directed treatment. Additionally, Medicaid expansion has been associated with improvements in cancer-related health outcomes, including improved survival rates. However, limitations and gaps in the current research on the impact of Medicaid expansion on patients with cancer exist, including a lack of long-term data on health outcomes. Additionally, further research is needed to better understand the mechanisms through which Medicaid expansion impacts cancer care.

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Despite significant advances in well-established treatment techniques, prognosis for advanced-stage HNSCC remains poor. Recent, accumulating evidence supports a role for immunotherapy in HNSCC treatment. Radiation therapy (RT), a standard treatment option for HNSCC, has immunomodulatory and immunostimulatory effects that may enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy. In several cancer types, combining RT and immunotherapy has been shown to improve tumor response rates, increase survival, and reduce toxicity compared to traditional chemotherapy and radiation therapy. This review provides a timely overview of the current knowledge on the use of RT and immunotherapy for treating HNSCC. It highlights the potential advantages of combining these therapies, such as improved tumor response rates, increased survival, and reduced toxicity. The review also discusses the challenges that need to be addressed when redefining the standard of care in HNSCC, and proposes further research to optimize treatment combinations, minimize radiation-induced toxicity, and identify suitable patient populations for treatment.

Background Prognostic disclosure is essential to informed decision making in oncology, yet many oncologists are unsure how to successfully facilitate this discussion. This scoping review determines what prognostic communication models exist, compares and contrasts these models, and explores the supporting evidence. Method A protocol was created for this study using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Protocols extension for Scoping Reviews. Comprehensive literature searches of electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Cochrane CENTRAL were executed to identify relevant publications between 1971 and 2020. Results In total, 1532 articles were identified, of which 78 met inclusion criteria and contained 5 communication models. Three of these have been validated in randomised controlled trials (the Serious Illness Conversation Guide, the Four Habits Model and the ADAPT acronym) and have demonstrated improved objective communication measures and patient reported outcomes. All three models emphasise the importance of exploring patients’ illness understanding and treatment preferences, communicating prognosis and responding to emotion. Conclusion Communicating prognostic estimates is a core competency skill in advanced cancer care. This scoping review highlights available communication models and identifies areas in need of further assessment. Such areas include how to maintain learnt communication skills for lifelong practice, how to assess patient and caregiver understanding during and after these conversations, and how to best scale these protocols at the institutional and national levels.

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed non-cutaneous cancer and is the leading cause of cancer mortality in females worldwide. Breast cancer incidence has been increasing over the last few decades; simultaneously, novel therapeutic agents including immunotherapies and targeted therapies have become more prominent in use. Radiation therapy continues to serve as a cornerstone to breast cancer treatment in both early-stage and locoregionally advanced disease. Given the improvement in systemic agents, there is increasing interest in investigating the potential synergistic effect of radiation therapy and immunotherapy. As new trials and studies emerge demonstrating the clinical benefits of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in breast cancer, especially in PD-L1-positive triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), it is crucial to investigate the safety and efficacy of combining immunotherapy with radiation treatment. This narrative review discusses the impact of radiation therapy on anti-tumor immunogenicity, and examines the role of immunotherapy and radiation therapy in early-stage, locally advanced, recurrent, and metastatic breast cancer. We conducted a targeted literature search between 2010 and 2024, and included phase II/III clinical trials, mechanistic studies, and ongoing trials that evaluated the combination of immunotherapy (IO) and radiation therapy (RT). We discuss ongoing clinical studies, side effects, and optimal timing of combined IO and RT to enhance therapeutic outcomes.

Radiotherapy is utilized in the treatment of various cancers of the central nervous system and head and neck. Given the high concentration of organs-at-risk in this region, care must be exercised to minimize the dose delivered to these structures. Studies have shown that excessive radiation exposure can adversely impact the eyes, potentially resulting in the loss of their function. For instance, radiation doses greater than 50 Gy have been shown to increase the incidence of retinopathy, and radiation doses as low as 0.5 Gy have been shown to induce cataract formation. In this review, we discuss the ocular complications of radiotherapy used in the treatment of cancers of the central nervous system and head and neck. We then transition to potential strategies to spare the eyes during radiotherapy in an effort to reduce the rates and severity of ocular complications and preserve vision.