José Alejandro Espinosa-Cerón

Dr. José Alejandro Espinosa-Cerón

Inmunología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Ciudad de México, Mexico
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 November 2018 in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GMGabriela Meneses
Gabriela Meneses
GCGraciela Cárdenas
Graciela Cárdenas
José Alejandro Espinosa-CerónJosé Alejandro Espinosa-Cerón
José Alejandro Espinosa-Cerón
DRDunia Rassy
Dunia Rassy
IPIvan Nicolás Pérez‐Osorio
Ivan Nicolás Pérez‐Osorio
ESEdda Sciutto
Edda Sciutto

22 August 2018 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GMGabriela Meneses
Gabriela Meneses
MRMarcos Rosetti
Marcos Rosetti
José Alejandro Espinosa-CerónJosé Alejandro Espinosa-Cerón
José Alejandro Espinosa-Cerón
AFAlejandra Florentino
Alejandra Florentino
MBMarcel Bautista
Marcel Bautista
ESEdda Sciutto
Edda Sciutto
Genetic and sexual factors influence the prevalence and the pathogenesis of many inflammatory disorders. In this study their relevance on the peripheral and central inflammatory status induced by a peripheral injection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was evaluated. BALB/c and CD-1 male and female mice were intraperitoneally injected with LPS. Spleens and brains were collected 2 and 72 hours later to study the levels of IL-6, TNF-α and IL-1β. Percentage of microglia and astrocytes was determined in the cortex and hippocampus. Locomotor activity was registered before and during the 72 hours after LPS-treatment. Two hours after LPS-injection, a peripheral increase of the three cytokines was found. In brains, LPS increased TNF-α only in males with higher levels in CD-1 than BALB/c. IL-1β increased only in CD-1 males. IL-6 increased in both strains with lower levels in BALB/c females. Peripheral and central levels of cytokines decline 72 hrs after LPS-treatment whilst a significantly increase of Iba-1 expression was detected. A dramatic drop of the locomotor activity was observed immediately after LPS injection. Our results show that acute systemic administration of LPS leads to peripheral and central increase of pro-inflammatory cytokines and microglia activation, in a strain and sex dependent manner.

7 September 2017 in Clinical and Experimental Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GMG Meneses
G Meneses
GGG Gevorkian
G Gevorkian
AFA Florentino
A Florentino
MBM A Bautista
M A Bautista
José Alejandro Espinosa-CerónJosé Alejandro Espinosa-Cerón
José Alejandro Espinosa-Cerón
HBH Besedovsky
H Besedovsky
Summary: Neuroinflammation is the hallmark of several infectious and neurodegenerative diseases. Synthetic glucocorticoids (GCs) are the first-line immunosuppressive drugs used for controlling neuroinflammation. A delayed diffusion of GCs molecules and the high systemic doses required for brain-specific targeting lead to severe undesirable effects, particularly when lifelong treatment is required. Therefore, there is an urgent need for improving this current therapeutic approach. The intranasal (i.n.) route is being employed increasingly for drug delivery to the brain via the olfactory system. In this study, the i.n. route is compared to the intravenous (i.v.) administration of GCs with respect to their effectiveness in controlling neuroinflammation induced experimentally by systemic lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection. A statistically significant reduction in interleukin (IL)-6 levels in the central nervous system (CNS) in the percentage of CD45+/CD11b+/lymphocyte antigen 6 complex locus G6D [Ly6G+ and in glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) immunostaining was observed in mice from the i.n.-dexamethasone (DX] group compared to control and i.v.-DX-treated animals. DX treatment did not modify the percentage of microglia and perivascular macrophages as determined by ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1 (Iba1) immunostaining of the cortex and hippocampus. The increased accumulation of DX in brain microvasculature in DX-i.n.-treated mice compared with controls and DX-IV-treated animals may underlie the higher effectiveness in controlling neuroinflammation. Altogether, these results indicate that IN-DX administration may offer a more efficient alternative than systemic administration to control neuroinflammation in different neuropathologies.

6 July 2020 in Neurotherapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
José Alejandro Espinosa-CerónJosé Alejandro Espinosa-Cerón
José Alejandro Espinosa-Cerón
GMGabriela Meneses
Gabriela Meneses
ACAnahí Chavarría
Anahí Chavarría
RMRaúl Mancilla
Raúl Mancilla
JPJosé Pedraza-Chaverri
José Pedraza-Chaverri
ESEdda Sciutto
Edda Sciutto

29 November 2019 in Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DRDunia Rassy
Dunia Rassy
BBBrandon Bárcena
Brandon Bárcena
IPIván Nicolás Pérez-Osorio
Iván Nicolás Pérez-Osorio
José Alejandro Espinosa-CerónJosé Alejandro Espinosa-Cerón
José Alejandro Espinosa-Cerón
APAlberto N. Peón
Alberto N. Peón
ESEdda Sciutto
Edda Sciutto
Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, the most common form, is characterized by acute neuroinflammatory episodes. In addition to continuous disease-modifying therapy, these relapses require treatment to prevent lesion accumulation and progression of disability. Intravenous methylprednisolone (1–2 g for 3–5 days) is the standard treatment for relapses. However, this treatment is invasive, requires hospitalization, leads to substantial systemic exposure of glucocorticoids, and can only reach modest concentrations in the central nervous system (CNS). Intranasal delivery may represent an alternative to deliver relapse treatment directly to the CNS with higher concentrations and reducing side effects. Histopathological analysis revealed that intranasal administration of methylprednisolone to mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) suppressed the neuroinflammatory peak, and reduced immune cell infiltration and demyelination in the CNS similarly to intravenous administration. Treatment also downregulated Iba1 and GFAP expression. A similar significant reduction of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-17, IFN-γ, and TNF-α levels in the spinal cord was attained in both intranasal and intravenously treated mice. No damage in the nasal cavity was found after intranasal administration. This study demonstrates that intranasal delivery of methylprednisolone is as efficient as the intravenous route to treat neuroinflammation in EAE.

28 December 2022 in Pharmaceutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GCGraciela Cárdenas
Graciela Cárdenas
RBRaul J Bobes
Raul J Bobes
GFGladis Fragoso
Gladis Fragoso
ECEdda Lydia Sciutto Conde
Edda Lydia Sciutto Conde
MHMarisela Hernández
Marisela Hernández
HJHelgi Jung-Cook
Helgi Jung-Cook
Dexamethasone (DXM) and methylprednisolone (MEP) are potent glucocorticoids used to control several inflammatory conditions. Evidence of delayed DXM reaching the central nervous system (CNS) as well as tachyphylaxis and systemic, undesirable side effects are the main limitations of peripheral delivery. Intranasal administration offers direct access to the brain as it bypasses the blood–brain barrier. The Mucosal Atomization Device is an optimal tool that can achieve rapid absorption into the CNS and the bloodstream across mucosal membranes. This study was designed to evaluate and compare the bioavailability of DXM and MEP after intranasal versus intravenous administration. Two open-label, balanced, randomized, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence, single-dose, crossover studies were conducted, which involved healthy male and female adult volunteers. After intranasal administration, DXM and MEP were detected in plasma after the first sampling time. Mean peak concentrations of DXM and MEP were 86.61 ng/mL at 60 min and 843.2 ng/mL at 1.5 h post-administration, respectively. DXM and MEP showed high absolute bioavailability, with values of 80% and 95%, respectively. No adverse effects were observed. DXM and MEP systemic bioavailability by intranasal administration was comparable with the intravenous one, suggesting that the intranasal route can be used as a non-invasive and appropriate alternative for systemic drug delivery.