Treatment of posterior meniscal roots tears evolved after biomechanical evidence of increased pressures on the tibiofemoral cartilage produced by this lesion and the subsequent accelerated development of arthritis or osteonecrosis observed clinically. However, little is known about the consequences of the detachment of the anterior roots. This in-vitro study analyzes the biomechanical changes in the tibiofemoral joint caused by avulsion of the anterior root of the lateral meniscus. The effectiveness of surgical root re-insertion to restore the pre-injured conditions is also evaluated. Using cadaveric knees at flexion angles from 0° to 90°, results show that the lesion significantly reduces the contact area and raises the pressure on the tibiofemoral cartilage of the injured compartment at all angles. Said modifications become larger at low flexion angles, which are the most frequent positions adopted by the knee in daily and sports activities, where they result similar to total meniscectomy. In-situ repair partially restores the contact biomechanics. Consequently, careful attention should be paid to proper diagnosis and treatment of detached anterior roots since the observed altered knee contact might induce similar degenerative problems in the cartilage as with completely detached posterior roots.

Spinopelvic dissociation (SPD) is a severe injury characterized by a discontinuity between the spine and the bony pelvis consisting of a bilateral longitudinal sacral fracture, most of the times through sacral neuroforamen, and a horizontal fracture, usually through the S1 or S2 body. The introduction of the concept of triangular osteosynthesis has shown to be an advance in the stability of spinopelvic fixation (SPF). However, a controversy exists as to whether the spinal fixation should reach up to L4 and, if so, it should be combined with transiliac-transsacral screws (TTS). The purpose of this study is to compare the biomechanical behavior in the laboratory of four different osteosynthesis constructs for SPD, including spinopelvic fixation of L5 versus L4 and L5; along with or without TTS in both cases. By means of a formerly described method by the authors, an unstable standardized H-type sacral fracture in twenty synthetic replicas of a male pelvis articulated to the lumbar spine, L1 to sacrum, (Model: 1300, SawbonesTM; Pacific Research Laboratories, Vashon, WA, USA), instrumented with four different techniques, were mechanically tested. We made 4 different constructs in 5 specimen samples for each construct. Groups: Group 1. Instrumentation of the L5-Iliac bones with TTS. Group 2. Instrumentation of the L4-L5-Iliac bones with TTS. Group 3. Instrumentation of L5-Iliac bones without TTS. Group 4: Instrumentation of L4-L5-Iliac bones without TTS. According to our results, it can be concluded that in SPD, better stability is obtained when proximal fixation is only up to L5, without including L4 (alternative hypothesis), the addition of transiliac-transsacral fixations is essential.

Introduction: To preserve knee function, surgical repair is indicated when a meniscal root disinsertion occurs. However, this surgery has not yet achieved complete recovery of the joint´s natural biomechanics, with the meniscus-suture interface identified as a potentially determining factor. Knowing the deformation and resistance behavior of the sutured meniscal horn and whether these properties are preserved as the patient ages could greatly contribute to improving repair outcomes.Methods: A cadaveric experimental study was conducted on human sutured menisci classified into three n = 22 age groups (young ≤55; 55 < middle-aged ≤75; 75 < old) were subjected to load-to-failure test by suture pulling. Meniscal thickness at the suture hole was measured and the applied traction force and tissue deformation in the suture area in the direction of traction were recorded during the test. The traction load that initiated the meniscal cut-out, Fc, maximum load borne by the meniscus, Fu, tissue stress at the cut-out initiation, Sc, and equivalent stiffness modulus at the suture area, ms, were calculated.Results: At the tissue level, the resistance in terms of Sc decrease with age (young: 47.2 MPa; middle-aged: 44.7 MPa; old: 33.8 MPa) being significantly different between the young and the old group (p = 0.015). Mean meniscal thickness increased with age (young: 2.50 mm; middle-aged: 2.92 mm; old: 3.38 mm; p = 0.001). Probably due to thickening, no differences in resistance were found at the specimen level, i.e., in Fc (overall mean 58.2 N) and Fu (overall mean 73.6 N). As for elasticity, ms was lower in the old group than in the young group (57.5 MPa vs. 113.6 MPa, p = 0.02) and the middle-aged one (57.5 MPa vs. 108.0 MPa, p = 0.04).Conclusion: Regarding the influence of age on the sutured meniscal horn tissue, in vitro experimentation revealed that meniscal horn specimens older than 75 years old had a more elastic tissue which was less resistant to cut-out than younger menisci at the suture hole area. However, a thickening of the meniscal horns with age, which was also found, leveled out the difference in the force that initiated the tear, as well as in the maximum force borne by the meniscus in the load-to-failure test.

Meniscal root repair is not routinely recommended for patients over 75 years old, yet surrogate age-unrestricted human or porcine models are used for its evaluation. This study assesses the suitability of older human or porcine meniscus models for in vitro testing of the sutured meniscal horn. Three groups of menisci underwent a load-to-failure test with continuous monitoring of the traction force and deformation around the suture: human < 75 years, human ≥ 75 years, and porcine. Both surrogate models were compared to the younger group. The porcine group exhibited a 172.1%-higher traction force before tearing (p < 0.001) and a 174.1%-higher ultimate force (p < 0.001), without there being differences between the human groups. At tissue level, the older group had a 28.7%-lower cut-out stress (p = 0.012) and the porcine group had a 57.2%-higher stress (p < 0.001). Regarding elasticity at the sutured area, a 48.1%-greater deformation rate was observed in the older group (p < 0.001), without difference for the porcine group. In conclusion, neither the porcine nor the older human model demonstrated a clear advantage as a surrogate model for young human sutured meniscal horns. The older human meniscus is preferable for resistance at the specimen level, while the porcine model better represents deformation in the sutured zone.

(1) Background: Image acquisition systems based on videogrammetry principles are widely used across various research fields, particularly in mechanics, with applications ranging from civil engineering to biomechanics and kinematic analysis. This study presents the design, development, and validation of a low-cost, two-camera 3D videogrammetry system for the kinematic analysis of human motion. (2) Materials and Methods: Built using commercially available components and custom MATLAB^® (version 2019b) software, the system captures synchronized video streams and extracts precise 3D coordinates of markers. Its performance was validated against the Vicon^® (Vicon Nexus 1.7.1) system, a gold standard in musculoskeletal motion analysis. Comparative tests were conducted under static and dynamic conditions at varying working distances and velocities. (3) Results: Results demonstrate that the proposed system achieves high accuracy, with maximum measurement errors below 0.3% relative to Vicon^®, and similar repeatability (SD of approximately 0.02 mm in static conditions). Compared to manual caliper measurements, both vision systems yielded similar results, with errors ranging between 0.01% and 0.82%. (4) Conclusions: A low-cost, two-camera videogrametric system was validated, offering full transparency, flexibility, and affordability, making it a practical alternative for both clinical and research settings in biomechanics and human movement analysis, with potential to be extended to general kinematic analysis.

Este libro se ha elaborado como un recurso educativo introductorio a la biomecánica, principalmente destinado a estudiantes de Ingeniería de la Salud e Ingeniería Biomédica. En él, en primer lugar, se establecen unas bases para el entendimiento y la compresión de conceptos mecánicos aplicados al cuerpo humano, así como de los tipos de ensayos existentes en biomecánica y las estructuras presentes en el sistema musculoesquelético, tales como el hueso, los músculos, los tendones y ligamentos, y las articulaciones, y su forma de modelarlos mecánicamente. Posteriormente, en el segundo capítulo se exponen las diferentes magnitudes de interés en biomecánica, y los diferentes sensores que se pueden emplear para obtenerlas a través de los ensayos explicados en el primer capítulo.