Background: The neoadjuvant use of immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with chemotherapy (nICT) or chemoradiotherapy (nICRT) in locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC) is currently an area of active ongoing research. Therefore, we carried out a comprehensive meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of the new strategy with routine neoadjuvant strategy, which included neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).Patients and methods: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase (via OVID), ISI Web of Science database and Cochrane Library were included. And, all of them were searched for eligible studies between January, 2000 and February, 2023. The pathological complete response (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR) were primary outcome of our study. The second outcome of interest was R0 resection rate. Odds ratio (OR) and associated 95% CI were used as the effect indicators comparing the safety and efficiency of the neoadjuvant immunotherapy with the routine neoadjuvant therapy. Fixed-effect model (Inverse Variance) or random-effect model (Mantel-Haenszel method) was performed depending on the statistically heterogeneity.Results: There were eight trials with 652 patients were included in our meta-analysis. The estimated pCR rate was higher in the neoadjuvant immunotherapy group (OR =1.86; 95% CI, 1.25–2.75; I² = 32.8%, P=0.166). The different results were found in the esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) subgroups, the estimated OR was 2.35 (95%CI, 1.00–2.72; I² = 30.9%, P=0.215) in the EAC subgroup, and 2.35 (95% CI, 1.20–4.54; I² = 45.3%, P=0.161) in the ESCC subgroup, respectively. The neoadjuvant immunotherapy also showed the advantage in the MPR rates (OR =2.66; 95% CI, 1.69–4.19; I² = 24.3%, P=0.252). There was no obvious difference between the neoadjuvant immunotherapy and routine neoadjuvant therapy with respect to surgical resection rate, R0 resection rate, surgical delay rate; while more treatment-related adverse events were observed for the neoadjuvant immunotherapy for pneumonitis/pneumonia (OR=3.46, 95% CI, 1.31–9.16; I² = 67.3%, P=0.005) and thyroid dysfunction (OR=4.69, 95% CI, 1.53–14.36; I² = 56.5%, P=0.032).Conclusion: The pooled correlations indicated that the neoadjuvant immunotherapy (both nICT and nICRT) could significantly increase the rates of pCR and MPR, compared with routine neoadjuvant therapy (both nCT and nCRT) in the treatment of locally advanced EC. The neoadjuvant immunotherapy and routine neoadjuvant therapy were with acceptable toxicity. However, randomized studies with larger groups of patients need to performed to confirm these results.Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42020155802.

Background: The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has become the standard of care for non-small cell lung cancer. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature to determine whether the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) following the use of ICIs predicts different clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods: Relevant studies from the time of database creation to July 20, 2023, were systematically searched to explore the differences in clinical outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC with or without irAEs. The outcome indicators included the occurrence of irAEs, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).Results: 25 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these studies, 22 reported the effect on OS, and 19 reported the effect on PFS. The results showed that for patients with NSCLC, the occurrence of irAEs after receiving immunotherapy showed a statistically significant benefit over the absence of irAEs for OS (HR=0.55,95% CI=0.46–0.65) and PFS (HR=0.55 95% CI=0.48–0.64), but severe irAEs (grades 3–5) were associated with worse OS (HR=1.05, 95% CI=0.87–1.27). Compared with gastrointestinal, lung, and hepatitis, irAEs of the skin and endocrine system tend to predict better OS and PFS.Conclusion: The occurrence of irAEs, especially mild and early irAEs, indicates better OS and PFS in patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs, irrespective of patient characteristics, type of ICIs, and irAEs. However, Grade 3 or higher toxicities resulted in worse OS.Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023409444.

Robotic and video-assisted lobectomy/segmentectomy for non-small cell lung cancer have similar perioperative outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis Junjie Mao, Zilong Tang, Yuan Mi, Haidi Xu, Kuankuan Li, Yuxiang Liang, Na Wang, Lei Wang

Aurora kinase A, as a pro-carcinogenic in gastric cancer and glioma kinase, is enhanced in several human tumors. However, it's regulatory mechanism in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unclear. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the expression status, functional roles, and molecular mechanisms of AURKA in ESCC development. AURKA expression was analyzed by the screening of the GEO database and detected using an immunohistochemical method. The biological function of AURKA on ESCC was evaluated in vitro and in vivo. Western blot assay, malondialdehyde (MDA), iron, and glutathione (GSH) kits were utilized to assess changes in ferroptosis. Database analysis results showed that AURKA was a differential gene in ESCC and was highly expressed in human ESCC tissues. Functionally, AURKA knockdown decreased ESCC cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis both in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, when AURKA was knockdown, cells were more correctly blocked in the G2/M phase, and the ferroptosis-related MDA and Fe increased, whereas the GSH reduced. Consistently, Glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) and solute carrier family 7a member 11 (SLC7A11) expression were downregulated by AURKA knockdown. However, ferroptosis inhibitor partially restore ESCC cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis caused by AURKA knockdown. AURKA knockdown enhances ferroptosis and acts against cancer progression in ESCC. AURKA acts as a tumor-promoting gene and may serve as potential target for ESCC treatment.

Background: Osimertinib, a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is the only Food and Drug Administration-approved third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)TKI. Osimertinib is a cancer medicine that interferes with the growth and spread of cancer cells in the body. Osimertinib is used to treat a certain type of non-small cell lung cancer. We review some of the main challenges in targeting EGFR, including lack of central nervous system penetration with most tyrosine kinase inhibitors, activity of osimertinib penetrating blood-brain barrier and the efficacy of osimertinib. Methods: Guided by the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement, we conducted a systematic literature search in the databases PubMed, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science database on January 30, 2020, searching for studies investigating the osimertinib efficacy on patients with CNS metastases in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). And Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the certainty in the evidence. Results: The pooled results showed that the overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 70% and 92%, respectively, in patients with T790M mutations. The efficacy of osimertinib was confirmed by the median progression free survival (PFS). In untreated advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC with CNS metastases patients, the pooled ORR and DCR of osimertinib were 71% and 93%, respectively. And the combined median PFS, achieved by osimertinib, was 12.21 months. Above data proved that osimertinib has well activity in disease control, especially in first line. Conclusions: This meta-analysis confirmed that in treatment-naive advanced NSCLC CNS metastases harboring EGFR-TKI-sensitizing mutations, Osimertinib showed impressive antitumor activity.

Clinicopathological and prognostic value of circulating tumor cells in esophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis Yaozhong Zhang, Haowen Deng, Ge Chen, Zilong Tang, Junjie Mao, Yuan Mi, Saijin Cui, Yaling Zhang, Na Wang, Lei Wang