Brian Elbing

Prof. Brian Elbing

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 October 2008 in Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BEBrian Elbing
Brian Elbing
EWEric S. Winkel
Eric S. Winkel
KLKeary A. Lay
Keary A. Lay
SCSteven L. Ceccio
Steven L. Ceccio
DDDavid R. Dowling
David R. Dowling
MPMarc Perlin
Marc Perlin
To investigate the phenomena of skin-friction drag reduction in a turbulent boundary layer (TBL) at large scales and high Reynolds numbers, a set of experiments has been conducted at the US Navy's William B. Morgan Large Cavitation Channel (LCC). Drag reduction was achieved by injecting gas (air) from a line source through the wall of a nearly zero-pressure-gradient TBL that formed on a flat-plate test model that was either hydraulically smooth or fully rough. Two distinct drag-reduction phenomena were investigated; bubble drag reduction (BDR) and air-layer drag reduction (ALDR).The streamwise distribution of skin-friction drag reduction was monitored with six skin-friction balances at downstream-distance-based Reynolds numbers to 220 million and at test speeds to 20.0ms−1. Near-wall bulk void fraction was measured at twelve streamwise locations with impedance probes, and near-wall (0 <Y< 5mm) bubble populations were estimated with a bubble imaging system. The instrument suite was used to investigate the scaling of BDR and the requirements necessary to achieve ALDR.Results from the BDR experiments indicate that: significant drag reduction (>25%) is limited to the first few metres downstream of injection; marginal improvement was possible with a porous-plate versus an open-slot injector design; BDR has negligible sensitivity to surface tension; bubble size is independent of surface tension downstream of injection; BDR is insensitive to boundary-layer thickness at the injection location; and no synergetic effect is observed with compound injection. Using these data, previous BDR scaling methods are investigated, but data collapse is observed only with the ‘initial zone’ scaling, which provides little information on downstream persistence of BDR.ALDR was investigated with a series of experiments that included a slow increase in the volumetric flux of air injected at free-stream speeds to 15.3ms−1. These results indicated that there are three distinct regions associated with drag reduction with air injection: Region I, BDR; Region II, transition between BDR and ALDR; and Region III, ALDR. In addition, once ALDR was established: friction drag reduction in excess of 80% was observed over the entire smooth model for speeds to 15.3ms−1; the critical volumetric flux of air required to achieve ALDR was observed to be approximately proportional to the square of the free-stream speed; slightly higher injection rates were required for ALDR if the surface tension was decreased; stable air layers were formed at free-stream speeds to 12.5ms−1with the surface fully roughened (though approximately 50% greater volumetric air flux was required); and ALDR was sensitive to the inflow conditions. The sensitivity to the inflow conditions can be mitigated by employing a small faired step (10mm height in the experiment) that helps to create a fixed separation line.

1 February 2013 in Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BEBrian Elbing
Brian Elbing
SMSimo Mäkiharju
Simo Mäkiharju
AWAndrew Wiggins
Andrew Wiggins
MPMarc Perlin
Marc Perlin
DDDavid R. Dowling
David R. Dowling
SCSteven L. Ceccio
Steven L. Ceccio
Air-induced drag reduction was investigated on a 12.9 m long flat plate test model at a free stream speed of $6. 3~\mathrm{m} ~{\mathrm{s} }^{- 1} $ . Measurements of the local skin friction, phase velocity profiles (liquid and gas) and void fraction profiles were acquired at downstream distances to 11.5 m, which yielded downstream-distance-based Reynolds numbers above 80 million. Air was injected within the boundary layer behind a 13 mm backward facing step (BFS) while the incoming boundary layer was perturbed with vortex generators in various configurations immediately upstream of the BFS. Measurements confirmed that air layer drag reduction (ALDR) is sensitive to upstream disturbances, but a clean boundary layer separation line (i.e. the BFS) reduces such sensitivity. Empirical scaling of the experimental data was investigated for: (a) the critical air flux required to establish ALDR; (b) void fraction profiles; and (c) the interfacial velocity profiles. A scaling of the critical air flux for ALDR was developed from balancing shear-induced lift forces and buoyancy forces on a single bubble within a shear flow. The resulting scaling successfully collapses ALDR results from the current and past studies over a range of flow conditions and test model configurations. The interfacial velocity and void fraction profiles were acquired and scaled within the bubble drag reduction (BDR), ALDR and transitional ALDR regimes. The BDR interfacial velocity profile revealed that there was slip between phases. The ALDR results showed that the air layer thickness was nominally three-quarters of the total volumetric flux (per unit span) of air injected divided by the free stream speed. Furthermore, the air layer had an average void fraction of 0.75 and a velocity of approximately 0.2 times the free stream speed. Beyond the air layer was a bubbly mixture that scaled in a similar fashion to the BDR results. Transitional ALDR results indicate that this regime was comprised of intermittent generation and subsequent fragmentation of an air layer, with the resulting drag reduction determined by the fraction of time that an air layer was present.

30 August 2013 in Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SMSimo A. Mäkiharju
Simo A. Mäkiharju
BEBrian Elbing
Brian Elbing
AWAndrew Wiggins
Andrew Wiggins
SSSarah Schinasi
Sarah Schinasi
JVJean-Marc Vanden-Broeck
Jean-Marc Vanden-Broeck
SCSteven L. Ceccio
Steven L. Ceccio
The behaviour of a nominally two-dimensional ventilated partial cavity was examined over a wide range of size scales and flow speeds to determine the influence of Froude, Reynolds, and Weber number on the cavity shape, dynamics, and gas entrainment rate. Two geometrically similar experiments were conducted with a 14:1 length scale ratio. The results were compared to a two-dimensional semi-analytical model of the cavity flow, and Froude scaling was found to be sufficient to match basic cavity shapes. However, the air flux required to maintain a stable cavity did not scale with Froude number alone, as the dynamics of the cavity closure changed with increasing Reynolds number. The required air flux differed over one order of magnitude between the lowest and highest Reynolds number flows. But, for sufficiently high Reynolds numbers, the rate of scaled entrainment appeared to approach Reynolds number independence. Modest changes in surface tension of the small-scale experiment suggested that the Weber number was important only at the lowest speeds and smaller length scale. Otherwise, the Weber numbers of the flows were sufficiently high to make the effects of interfacial tension negligible. We also observed that modest unsteadiness in the inflow to the large-scale cavity led to a significant increase in the required air flux needed to maintain a stable cavity, with the required excess gas flux nominally proportional to the flow’s perturbation amplitude. Finally, discussion is provided on how these results relate to model testing of partial cavity drag reduction (PCDR) systems for surface ships.

1 April 2007 in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KSKarim G. Sabra
Karim G. Sabra
EWEric S. Winkel
Eric S. Winkel
DBDwayne A. Bourgoyne
Dwayne A. Bourgoyne
BEBrian Elbing
Brian Elbing
SCSteve L. Ceccio
Steve L. Ceccio
DDDavid R. Dowling
David R. Dowling
It has been demonstrated theoretically and experimentally that an estimate of the impulse response (or Green’s function) between two receivers can be obtained from the cross correlation of diffuse wave fields at these two receivers in various environments and frequency ranges: ultrasonics, civil engineering, underwater acoustics, and seismology. This result provides a means for structural monitoring using ambient structure-borne noise only, without the use of active sources. This paper presents experimental results obtained from flow-induced random vibration data recorded by pairs of accelerometers mounted within a flat plate or hydrofoil in the test section of the U.S. Navy’s William B. Morgan Large Cavitation Channel. The experiments were conducted at high Reynolds number (Re>50 million) with the primary excitation source being turbulent boundary layer pressure fluctuations on the upper and lower surfaces of the plate or foil. Identical deterministic time signatures emerge from the noise cross-correlation function computed via robust and simple processing of noise measured on different days by a pair of passive sensors. These time signatures are used to determine and/or monitor the structural response of the test models from a few hundred to a few thousand Hertz.

17 September 2017 in Atmosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BHBenjamin L. Hemingway
Benjamin L. Hemingway
AFAmy Frazier
Amy Frazier
BEBrian Elbing
Brian Elbing
JJJamey D. Jacob
Jamey D. Jacob
The lowest portion of the Earth’s atmosphere, known as the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL), plays an important role in the formation of weather events. Simple meteorological measurements collected from within the ABL, such as temperature, pressure, humidity, and wind velocity, are key to understanding the exchange of energy within this region, but conventional surveillance techniques such as towers, radar, weather balloons, and satellites do not provide adequate spatial and/or temporal coverage for monitoring weather events. Small unmanned aircraft, or aerial, systems (sUAS) provide a versatile, dynamic platform for atmospheric sensing that can provide higher spatio-temporal sampling frequencies than available through most satellite sensing methods. They are also able to sense portions of the atmosphere that cannot be measured from ground-based radar, weather stations, or weather balloons and have the potential to fill gaps in atmospheric sampling. However, research on the vertical sampling scales for collecting atmospheric measurements from sUAS and the variabilities of these scales across atmospheric phenomena (e.g., temperature and humidity) is needed. The objective of this study is to use variogram analysis, a common geostatistical technique, to determine optimal spatial sampling scales for two atmospheric variables (temperature and relative humidity) captured from sUAS. Results show that vertical sampling scales of approximately 3 m for temperature and 1.5–2 m for relative humidity were sufficient to capture the spatial structure of these phenomena under the conditions tested. Future work is needed to model these scales across the entire ABL as well as under variable conditions.

1 August 2013 in Physics of Fluids
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BEBrian Elbing
Brian Elbing
MPMarc Perlin
Marc Perlin
DDDavid R. Dowling
David R. Dowling
SCSteven L. Ceccio
Steven L. Ceccio
The current study explores the influence of polymer drag reduction on the near-wall velocity distribution in a turbulent boundary layer (TBL) and its dependence on Reynolds number. Recent moderate Reynolds number direct numerical simulation and experimental studies presented in White et al. [Phys. Fluids 24, 021701 (2012)] have challenged the classical representation of the logarithmic dependence of the velocity profile for drag-reduced flows, especially at drag reduction levels above 40%. In the present study, high Reynolds number data from a drag reduced TBL is presented and compared to the observations of White et al. [Phys. Fluids 24, 021701 (2012)]. Data presented here were acquired in the TBL flow on a 12.9-m-long flat plate at speeds to 20.3 m s−1, achieving momentum thickness based Reynolds number to 1.5 × 105, which is an order of magnitude greater than that available in the literature. Polyethylene oxide solutions with an average molecular weight of 3.9 × 106 g mol−1 were injected into the flow at various concentrations and volumetric fluxes to achieve a particular level of drag reduction. The resulting mean near-wall velocity profiles show distinctly different behavior depending on whether they fall in the low drag reduction (LDR) or the high drag reduction (HDR) regimes, which are nominally divided at 40% drag reduction. In the LDR regime, the classical view that the logarithmic slope remains constant at the Newtonian value and the intercept constant increases with increasing drag reduction appears to be valid. However, in the HDR regime the behavior is no longer universal. The intercept constant continues to increase linearly in proportion to the drag reduction level until a Reynolds-number-dependent threshold is achieved, at which point the intercept constant rapidly decreases to that predicted by the ultimate profile. The rapid decrease in the intercept constant is due to the corresponding increase in the profile slope in the HDR regime. There was significant scatter in the observed slope in the HDR regime, but the scatter did not appear to be Reynolds number dependent. Finally, the ultimate profiles for flows at maximum drag reduction were examined and did not exhibit a logarithmic functional relationship, which is the classical empirical relationship suggested by Virk [J. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. 21, 625–656 (1975)].