Jose Alejandro Madrigal

Prof. Dr. Jose Alejandro Madrigal


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

38Years (1989-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 June 2017 in Cellular & Molecular Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAnushruti Sarvaria
Anushruti Sarvaria
Jose Alejandro MadrigalJose Alejandro Madrigal
Jose Alejandro Madrigal
ASAurore Saudemont
Aurore Saudemont
The balance between immune effector cells and immunosuppressive cells and how this regulates the tumor microenvironment has been well described. A significant contribution of immune regulatory cells, including regulatory T cells, to tumor progression has been widely reported. An emerging body of evidence has recently recognized a role for B cells in modulating the immune response to tumors and lymphoid malignancies. Regulatory B cells (Bregs) are a newly designated subset of B cells that have been shown to play a pivotal role in regulating immune responses involved in inflammation, autoimmunity and, more recently, cancer. Bregs can suppress diverse cell subtypes, including T cells, through the secretion of anti-inflammatory mediators, such as IL-10, and can facilitate the conversion of T cells to regulatory T cells, thus attenuating anti-tumor immune responses. Similar B-cell subpopulations have been reported to be recruited to the tumor but to acquire their immunosuppressive properties within the tumor bed and thereby attenuate anti-tumor immune responses. However, despite a pivotal role for Bregs in promoting inflammation and carcinogenesis, the phenotypic diversity of the cell surface markers that are unique to Bregs remains unclear in mice and humans. In this review, we summarize the characteristics of Bregs and review our current knowledge of Bregs and their inhibition of anti-tumor immune responses in murine tumor models and cancer patients.

1 March 2015 in The Lancet Haematology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AGAlois Gratwohl
Alois Gratwohl
MPMarcelo C Pasquini
Marcelo C Pasquini
MAMahmoud Aljurf
Mahmoud Aljurf
YAYoshiko Atsuta
Yoshiko Atsuta
HBHelen Baldomero
Helen Baldomero
DNDietger Niederwieser
Dietger Niederwieser

1 April 2012 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KFKatharina Fleischhauer
Katharina Fleischhauer
BSBronwen E Shaw
Bronwen E Shaw
TGTheodore Gooley
Theodore Gooley
MMMari Malkki
Mari Malkki
PBPeter Bardy
Peter Bardy
EPEffie W Petersdorf
Effie W Petersdorf

23 March 2015 in Bone Marrow Transplantation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAnna Sureda
Anna Sureda
PBP Bader
P Bader
Simone CesaroSimone Cesaro
Simone Cesaro
PDP Dreger
P Dreger
RDR F Duarte
R F Duarte
Jose Alejandro MadrigalJose Alejandro Madrigal
Jose Alejandro Madrigal
This is the sixth special report that the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation regularly publishes on the current practice and indications for haematopoietic SCT for haematological diseases, solid tumours and immune disorders in Europe. Major changes have occurred in the field of haematopoietic SCT over the last years. Cord blood units as well as haploidentical donors have been increasingly used as stem cell sources for allo-SCT, thus, augmenting the possibility of finding a suitable donor for a patient. Continuous refinement of conditioning strategies has also expanded not only the number of potential indications but also has permitted consideration of older patients or those with co-morbidity for a transplant. There is accumulating evidence of the role of haematopoietic SCT in non-haematological disorders such as autoimmune diseases. On the other hand, the advent of new drugs and very effective targeted therapy has challenged the role of SCT in some instances or at least, modified its position in the treatment armamentarium of a given patient. An updated report with revised tables and operating definitions is presented.

29 July 2013 in Bone Marrow Transplantation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TRT Ruutu
T Ruutu
AGA Gratwohl
A Gratwohl
TWT De Witte
T De Witte
BAB Afanasyev
B Afanasyev
JAJ Apperley
J Apperley
DND Niederwieser
D Niederwieser
GVHD remains the major impediment to broader application of allogeneic haematopoietic SCT. It can be prevented completely, but at the expense of other complications, rejection, relapse or delayed immune reconstitution. No optimal prevention or treatment method has been defined. This is reflected by enormous heterogeneity in approaches in Europe. Retrospective comparisons between different policies, although warranted, do not give definite answers. In order to improve the present situation, an European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and the European LeukemiaNet working group has developed in a Delphi-like approach recommendations for prophylaxis and treatment of GVHD in the most common allogeneic transplant setting, transplantation from an HLA-identical sibling or unrelated donor for standard risk malignant disease. The working group proposes these guidelines to be adopted as routine standard in transplantation centres and to be used as comparator in systematic studies evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of practices differing from these recommendations.

23 September 2010 in Blood
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AKAndrea Knight
Andrea Knight
Jose Alejandro MadrigalJose Alejandro Madrigal
Jose Alejandro Madrigal
SGSarah Grace
Sarah Grace
JSJanani Sivakumaran
Janani Sivakumaran
PKPanagiotis Kottaridis
Panagiotis Kottaridis
MLMark W. Lowdell
Mark W. Lowdell
Reactivation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a serious complication after allogeneic stem cell transplantation, but the role of γδ T cells is undefined. We have studied the immune reconstitution of Vδ2negative (Vδ2neg) γδ T cells, including Vδ1 and Vδ3 subsets and Vδ2positive (Vδ2pos) γδ T cells in 40 patients during the first 24 months after stem cell transplantation. Significant long-term expansions of Vδ2neg but not Vδ2pos γδ T cells were observed during CMV reactivation early after transplantation, suggesting direct involvement of γδ T cells in anti-CMV immune responses. Similarly, significantly higher numbers of Vδ2neg γδ T cells were detected in CMV-seropositive healthy persons compared with seronegative donors; the absolute numbers of Vδ2pos cells were not significantly different. The expansion of Vδ2neg γδ T cells appeared to be CMV-related because it was absent in CMV-negative/Epstein-Barr virus-positive patients. T-cell receptor-δ chain determining region 3 spectratyping of Vδ2neg γδ T cells in healthy subjects and patients showed restricted clonality. Polyclonal Vδ2neg cell lines generated from CMV-seropositive healthy donors and from a recipient of a graft from a CMV-positive donor lysed CMV-infected targets in all cases. Our study shows new evidence for role of γδ T cells in the immune response to CMV reactivation in transplantation recipients.