Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the deadliest solid tumors. The rapid progression of PDAC results in an advanced stage of patients when diagnosed. However, the dynamic molecular mechanism underlying PDAC progression remains far from clear. Methods: The microarray GSE62165 containing PDAC staging samples was obtained from Gene Expression Omnibus and the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between normal tissue and PDAC of different stages were profiled using R software, respectively. The software program Short Time-series Expression Miner was applied to cluster, compare, and visualize gene expression differences between PDAC stages. Then, function annotation and pathway enrichment of DEGs were conducted by Database for Annotation Visualization and Integrated Discovery. Further, the Cytoscape plugin DyNetViewer was applied to construct the dynamic protein–protein interaction networks and to analyze different topological variation of nodes and clusters over time. The phosphosite markers of stage-specific protein kinases were predicted by PhosphoSitePlus database. Moreover, survival analysis of candidate genes and pathways was performed by Kaplan–Meier plotter. Finally, candidate genes were validated by immunohistochemistry in PDAC tissues. Results: Compared with normal tissues, the total DEGs number for each PDAC stage were 994 (stage I), 967 (stage IIa), 965 (stage IIb), 1027 (stage III), 925 (stage IV), respectively. The stage-course gene expression analysis showed that 30 distinct expressional models were clustered. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis indicated that the up-regulated DEGs were commonly enriched in five fundamental pathways throughout five stages, including pathways in cancer, small cell lung cancer, ECM-receptor interaction, amoebiasis, focal adhesion. Except for amoebiasis, these pathways were associated with poor PDAC overall survival. Meanwhile, LAMA3, LAMB3, LAMC2, COL4A1 and FN1 were commonly shared by these five pathways and were unfavorable factors for prognosis. Furthermore, by constructing the stage-course dynamic protein interaction network, 45 functional molecular modules and 19 nodes were identified as featured regulators for all PDAC stages, among which the collagen family and integrins were considered as two main regulators for facilitating aggressive progression. Additionally, the clinical relevance analysis suggested that the stage IV featured nodes MLF1IP and ITGB4 were significantly correlated with shorter overall survival. Moreover, 15 stage-specific protein kinases were identified from the dynamic network and CHEK1 was particularly activated at stage IV. Experimental validation showed that MLF1IP, LAMA3 and LAMB3 were progressively increased from tumor initiation to progression. Conclusions: Our study provided a view for a better understanding of the dynamic landscape of molecular interaction networks during PDAC progression and offered potential targets for therapeutic intervention.

Background: Tumor metastasis is the main cause of death for breast cancer patients. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) has strong anti-tumor effects with very low toxicity and may be a potential candidate drug. However, the anti-metastatic effect and molecular mechanism of CAPE on breast cancer need more research. Methods: MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells were used here. Wound healing and Transwell assay were used for migration and invasion detection. Western blot and RT-qPCR were carried out for the epithelial-to-myofibroblast transformation (EMT) process investigation. Western blot and immunofluorescence were performed for fibroblast growth factor receptor1 (FGFR1) phosphorylation and nuclear transfer detection. Co-immunoprecipitation was used for the FGFR1/myeloid differentiation protein2 (MD2) complex investigation. Results: Our results suggested that CAPE blocks the migration, invasion, and EMT process of breast cancer cells. Mechanistically, CAPE inhibits FGFR1 phosphorylation and nuclear transfer while overexpression of FGFR1 reduces the anti-metastasis effect of CAPE. Further, we found that FGFR1 is bound to MD2, and silencing MD2 inhibits FGFR1 phosphorylation and nuclear transfer as well as cell migration and invasion. Conclusion: This study illustrated that CAPE restrained FGFR1 activation and nuclear transfer through MD2/FGFR1 complex inhibition and showed good inhibitory effects on the metastasis of breast cancer cells.

Purpose: Approximately 20% of all breast cancer cases are classified as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), which represents the most challenging subtype due to its poor prognosis and high metastatic rate. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE), the main component extracted from propolis, has been reported to exhibit anticancer activity across various tumor cell types. This study aimed to investigate the effects and mechanisms of CAPE on TNBC. Methods: MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells were treated with CAPE. CCK8 and colony formation assays were performed to analyze cell proliferation. Western blot, TUNEL and Annexin V-FITC/PI staining methods were employed to assess cell apoptosis. ROS, MDA, SOD, GSH, C11-bodipy staining, along with measurements of GPX4 and Ferritin levels, were utilized for ferroptosis detection. Western blot and immunofluorescence analysis were used to assess key regulatory molecules. The cells were subjected to treatments involving ferroptosis inhibition, AMPK inhibition, or Foxo3 inhibition, followed by CAPE administration to assess cell proliferation, apoptosis, and ferroptosis. Tumor xenografts were used to evaluate the antitumor efficacy of CAPE. Results: CAPE not only suppressed cell proliferation but also promoted apoptosis followed by ferroptosis. Co-incubation with Fer-1 (a ferroptosis inhibitor) diminished CAPE’s suppressive effects on proliferation and apoptosis induction. CAPE treatment enhanced the phosphorylation of AMPK and promoted the nuclear translocation of Foxo3. Inhibition of both AMPK and Foxo3 by siRNAs or inhibitors (Compc, TIC10) reversed the growth retardation induced by CAPE as well as its pro-apoptotic effects leading to ferroptosis. Specifically, AMPK inhibition abrogated the CAPE-induced nuclear translocation of Foxo3. CAPE significantly inhibited tumor growth in nude mice bearing TNBC xenografts. Conclusion: CAPE possesses a resistance effect on TNBC via activation of AMPK and Foxo3 signaling pathways.

Background: In the progression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), aberrant micro RNAs (miRNAs) expression plays a crucial role. This study sought to identify and validate the key miRNAs and potential target genes involved in PDAC. A bioinformatic analysis was conducted to determine their potential use as biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Methods: Gene profiling data sets (GSE41372 and GSE32688) were retrieved from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. Differentially expressed miRNAs (DEMs) with a P value 2 was identified. The prognostic value of the DEMs was accessed using the online server Kaplan-Meier plotter. Further, gene ontology terms and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analyses were performed using DAVID 6.7. The protein-protein interaction analyses were conducted with STRING, and miRNA-hub gene networks were constructed using Cytoscape software. The PDAC cells were transfected with miRNA inhibitors or mimics. Cell Counting Kit-8 assays and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining were used to examine cell proliferation and apoptosis, respectively. Wound-healing assays were performed to evaluate cell migration. Results: Three DEMs (hsa-miR-21-5p, hsa-miR-135b-5p, and hsa-miR-222-3p) were identified. High expression levels of hsa-miR-21-5p, hsa-miR-135b-5p, or hsa-miR-222-3p predicted poor overall survival in PDAC patients. The pathway analysis revealed that the predicted target genes of the DEMs were closely related to several signaling pathways (including ‘pathways in cancer’, ‘miRNAs in cancer’, ‘platinum drug resistance’, ‘lipid and atherosclerosis’, and ‘MAPK signaling pathway’). The MYC proto-oncogene (MYC), phosphate and tensin homolog gene (PTEN), poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1), von Hippel-Lindau (VHL), and fork head box p3 (FOXP3) were identified as potential target genes. The inhibition of hsa-miR-21-5p, hsa-miR-135b-5p, or hsa-miR-222-3p expression decreased cell proliferation. The overexpression of hsa-miR-21-5p, hsa-miR-135b-5p, or hsa-miR-222-3p facilitated PDAC cell migration. Conclusions: This study constructed the miRNA-hub gene network, which provides novel insights into the PDAC progression. Although further research is required, our results offer clues for new potential prognostic markers and therapeutic targets of PDAC.