Studying password-cracking techniques is essential in the information security discipline as it highlights the vulnerability of weak passwords and the need for stronger security measures to protect sensitive information. While both methods aim to uncover passwords, both approach the task in different ways. A brute force algorithm generates all possible combinations of characters in a specified range and length, while the dictionary attack checks against a predefined word list. This study compares the efficiency of these methods using parallel versions of Python, C++, and Hashcat. The results show that the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with CUDA is significantly faster than the Intel(R) HD Graphics 630 GPU for cracking passwords, with a speedup of 11.5× and 10.4× for passwords with and without special characters, respectively. Special characters increase password-cracking time, making the process more challenging. The results of our implementation indicate that parallel processing greatly improves the speed of password-cracking techniques. The brute force algorithm achieved a speedup of 1.9× with six cores, while the dictionary attack showed a speedup of 4.4× with eight-core static scheduling. Studying password-cracking techniques highlights the need for stronger security measures to protect sensitive information and the vulnerability of weak passwords.

Obesity is increasingly becoming a prevalent health concern among adolescents, leading to significant risks like cardiometabolic diseases (CMDs). The early discovery and diagnosis of CMD is essential for better outcomes. This study aims to build a reliable artificial intelligence model that can predict CMD using various machine learning techniques. Support vector machines (SVMs), K-Nearest neighbor (KNN), Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and Gradient Boosting are five robust classifiers that are compared in this study. A novel “risk level” feature, derived through fuzzy logic applied to the Conicity Index, as a novel feature, which was previously unused, is introduced to enhance the interpretability and discriminatory properties of the proposed models. As the Conicity Index scores indicate CMD risk, two separate models are developed to address each gender individually. The performance of the proposed models is assessed using two datasets obtained from 295 records of undergraduate students in Saudi Arabia. The dataset comprises 121 male and 174 female students with diverse risk levels. Notably, Logistic Regression emerges as the top performer among males, achieving an accuracy score of 91%, while Gradient Boosting lags with a score of 72%. Among females, both Support Vector Machine and Logistic Regression lead with an accuracy score of 87%, while Random Forest performs least optimally with a score of 80%.