jean-christophe roze

Prof. jean-christophe roze

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2008 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BLBéatrice Larroque
Béatrice Larroque
PAPierre-Yves Ancel
Pierre-Yves Ancel
SMStéphane Marret
Stéphane Marret
LMLaetitia Marchand
Laetitia Marchand
MAMonique André
Monique André
MKMonique Kaminski
Monique Kaminski

1 March 2015 in JAMA Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PAPierre-Yves Ancel
Pierre-Yves Ancel
FGFrançois Goffinet
François Goffinet
PKPierre Kuhn
Pierre Kuhn
BLBruno Langer
Bruno Langer
JMJacqueline Matis
Jacqueline Matis
MKMonique Kaminski
Monique Kaminski
Previous cohort studies1-7 suggest that survival of infants born before 27 weeks’ gestation has improved during the past 2 decades. However, disability rates remain high at these gestational ages.8-10 Moreover, countries differ substantially in their organization of care, available resources, national laws, and cultural preferences regarding provision of proactive care. Therefore, to provide the best available information for parents and medical staff to use in making treatment decisions, mortality and morbidity must be monitored, and studies should be conducted in countries with different attitudes toward active care at early gestational ages.

1 May 2017 in The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CCCaroline Charlier
Caroline Charlier
ÉPÉlodie Perrodeau
Élodie Perrodeau
Alexandre LeclercqAlexandre Leclercq
Alexandre Leclercq
BCBenoît Cazenave
Benoît Cazenave
BPBenoît Pilmis
Benoît Pilmis
CZChristian Zumbo
Christian Zumbo
Listeriosis is a severe foodborne infection and a notifiable disease in France. We did a nationwide prospective study to characterise its clinical features and prognostic factors. MONALISA was a national prospective observational cohort study. We enrolled eligible cases declared to the National Reference Center for Listeria (all microbiologically proven) between Nov 3, 2009, and July 31, 2013, in the context of mandatory reporting. The outcomes were analysis of clinical features, characterisation of Listeria isolates, and determination of predictors of 3-month mortality or persisting impairment using logistic regression. A hierarchical clustering on principal components was also done for neurological and bacteraemic cases. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01520597. We enrolled 818 cases from 372 centres, including 107 maternal-neonatal infections, 427 cases of bacteraemia, and 252 cases of neurolisteriosis. Only five (5%) of 107 pregnant women had an uneventful outcome. 26 (24%) of 107 mothers experienced fetal loss, but never after 29 weeks of gestation or beyond 2 days of admission to hospital. Neurolisteriosis presented as meningoencephalitis in 212 (84%) of 252 patients; brainstem involvement was only reported in 42 (17%) of 252 patients. 3-month mortality was higher for bacteraemia than neurolisteriosis (hazard ratio [HR] 0·54 [95% CI 0·41-0·69], p<0·0001). For both bacteraemia and neurolisteriosis, the strongest mortality predictors were ongoing cancer (odds ratio [OR] 5·19 [95% CI 3·01-8·95], p<0·0001), multi-organ failure (OR 7·98 [4·32-14·72], p<0·0001), aggravation of any pre-existing organ dysfunction (OR 4·35 [2·79-6·81], p<0·0001), and monocytopenia (OR 3·70 [1·82-7·49], p=0·0003). Neurolisteriosis mortality was higher in blood-culture positive patients (OR 3·67 [1·60-8·40], p=0·002) or those receiving adjunctive dexamethasone (OR 4·58 [1·50-13·98], p=0·008). The severity of listeriosis is higher than reported elsewhere. We found evidence of a significantly reduced survival in patients with neurolisteriosis treated with adjunctive dexamethasone, and also determined the time window for fetal losses. MONALISA provides important new data to improve management and predict outcome in listeriosis. Programme Hospitalier Recherche Clinique, Institut Pasteur, Inserm, French Public Health Agency.

1 June 2009 in Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MDMalika Delobel-Ayoub
Malika Delobel-Ayoub
CACatherine Arnaud
Catherine Arnaud
MWMelanie White-Koning
Melanie White-Koning
CCCharlotte Casper
Charlotte Casper
VPVéronique Pierrat
Véronique Pierrat
FGfor the EPIPAGE Study Group
for the EPIPAGE Study Group
OBJECTIVES. We compared the frequency of behavioral problems in very preterm and term children at 5 years of age. We hypothesized that behavioral problems would be associated with cognitive impairment and environmental factors and that differences between the 2 groups would be reduced but persist after adjusting for cognitive performance and environmental factors.PATIENTS AND METHODS. The Etude Epidémiologique sur les Petits Ages Gestationnels (EPIPAGE) study was a prospective population-based cohort study that included all births occurring between 22 and 32 weeks' gestation and a control group of infants born at 39 to 40 weeks' gestation in 1997 in 9 French regions. Neonatal and obstetrics data were collected at birth. At 5 years of age, sociodemographic status and neurodevelopmental and cognitive development of the children, as well as maternal mental well-being, were assessed. The behavioral problems of 1102 very preterm and 375 term singletons without major impairments were studied by using the parent-completed Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.RESULTS. Parents of very preterm children reported significantly more behavioral problems, with a twofold higher prevalence compared with term children for hyperactivity/inattention, emotional symptoms, and peer problems. Behavioral problems were associated with low cognitive performance, developmental delay, hospitalizations of the child, young maternal age, and poor maternal mental well-being. Very preterm children were still at higher risk of behavioral problems compared with term children after adjustment for cognitive performance and all others factors.CONCLUSIONS. Behavioral problems were strongly related to cognitive impairment, but very preterm children were still at higher risk even after adjusting for cognitive performance. Early screening for behavioral problems should be encouraged for all very preterm children, and maternal well-being should also be the focus of special attention.

28 April 2021 in BMJ
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VPVéronique Pierrat
Véronique Pierrat
LMLaetitia Marchand-Martin
Laetitia Marchand-Martin
SMStéphane Marret
Stéphane Marret
CACatherine Arnaud
Catherine Arnaud
VBValérie Benhammou
Valérie Benhammou
PAPierre-Yves Ancel
Pierre-Yves Ancel
Objectives To describe neurodevelopment at age 5 among children born preterm. Design Population based cohort study, EPIPAGE-2. Setting France, 2011. Participants 4441 children aged 5½ born at 24-26, 27-31, and 32-34 weeks Main outcome measures Severe/moderate neurodevelopmental disabilities, defined as severe/moderate cerebral palsy (Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) ≥2), or unilateral or bilateral blindness or deafness, or full scale intelligence quotient less than minus two standard deviations (Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, 4th edition). Mild neurodevelopmental disabilities, defined as mild cerebral palsy (GMFCS-1), or visual disability ≥3.2/10 and <5/10, or hearing loss <40 dB, or full scale intelligence quotient (minus two to minus one standard deviation) or developmental coordination disorders (Movement Assessment Battery for Children, 2nd edition, total score less than or equal to the fifth centile), or behavioural difficulties (strengths and difficulties questionnaire, total score greater than or equal to the 90th centile), school assistance (mainstream class with support or special school), complex developmental interventions, and parents’ concerns about development. The distributions of the scores in contemporary term born children were used as reference. Results are given after multiple imputation as percentages of outcome measures with exact binomial 95% confidence intervals. Results Among 4441 participants, 3083 (69.4%) children were assessed. Rates of severe/moderate neurodevelopmental disabilities were 28% (95% confidence interval 23.4% to 32.2%), 19% (16.8% to 20.7%), and 12% (9.2% to 14.0%) and of mild disabilities were 38.5% (33.7% to 43.4%), 36% (33.4% to 38.1%), and 34% (30.2% to 37.4%) at 24-26, 27-31, and 32-34 weeks, respectively. Assistance at school was used by 27% (22.9% to 31.7%), 14% (12.1% to 15.9%), and 7% (4.4% to 9.0%) of children at 24-26, 27-31, and 32-34 weeks, respectively. About half of the children born at 24-26 weeks (52% (46.4% to 57.3%)) received at least one developmental intervention which decreased to 26% (21.8% to 29.4%) for those born at 32-34 weeks. Behaviour was the concern most commonly reported by parents. Rates of neurodevelopment disabilities increased as gestational age decreased and were higher in families with low socioeconomic status. Conclusions In this large cohort of children born preterm, rates of severe/moderate neurodevelopmental disabilities remained high in each gestational age group. Proportions of children receiving school assistance or complex developmental interventions might have a significant impact on educational and health organisations. Parental concerns about behaviour warrant attention.

5 April 2012 in BMJ Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
jean-christophe rozejean-christophe roze
jean-christophe roze
DDDominique Darmaun
Dominique Darmaun
Clair--Yves BOQUIENClair--Yves BOQUIEN
Clair--Yves BOQUIEN
CFCyril Flamant
Cyril Flamant
JPJean-Charles Picaud
Jean-Charles Picaud
PAPierre-Yves Ancel
Pierre-Yves Ancel
Context Supplementation of breast milk is difficult once infants suckle the breast and is often discontinued at end of hospitalisation and after discharge. Thus, breastfed preterm infants are exposed to an increased risk of nutritional deficit with a possible consequence on neurodevelopmental outcome. Objective To assess the relationship between breast feeding at time of discharge, weight gain during hospitalisation and neurodevelopmental outcome. Design Observational cohort study. Setting Two large, independent population-based cohorts of very preterm infants: the Loire Infant Follow-up Team (LIFT) and the EPIPAGE cohorts. Patients 2925 very preterm infants alive at discharge. Main outcome measure Suboptimal neurodevelopmental outcome, defined as a score in the lower tercile, using Age and Stages Questionnaire at 2 years in LIFT and Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children Test at 5 years in EPIPAGE. Two propensity scores for breast feeding at discharge, one for each cohort, were used to reduce bias. Results Breast feeding at time of discharge concerned only 278/1733 (16%) infants in LIFT and 409/2163 (19%) infants in EPIPAGE cohort. Breast feeding is significantly associated with an increased risk of losing one weight Z-score during hospitalisation (LIFT: n=1463, adjusted odd ratio (aOR)=2.51 (95% CI 1.87 to 3.36); EPIPAGE: n=1417, aOR=1.55 (95% CI 1.14 to 2.12)) and with a decreased risk for a suboptimal neurodevelopmental assessment (LIFT: n=1463, aOR=0.63 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.87); EPIPAGE: n=1441, aOR=0.65 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.89) and an increased chance of having a head circumference Z-score higher than 0.5 at 2 years in LIFT cohort (n=1276, aOR=1.43 (95% CI 1.02 to 2.02)) and at 5 years in EPIPAGE cohort (n=1412, aOR=1.47 (95% CI 1.10 to 1.95)). Conclusions The observed better neurodevelopment in spite of suboptimal initial weight gain could be termed the ‘apparent breastfeeding paradox’ in very preterm infants. Regardless of the mechanisms involved, the current data provide encouragement for the use of breast feeding in preterm infants.