Clostridioides difficile remains an important public health threat, globally. Since the emergence of the hypervirulent strain, ribotype 027, new strains have been reported to cause C. difficile infection (CDI) with poor health outcomes, including ribotypes 014/020, 017, 056, 106, and 078/126. These strains differ in their geographic distribution, genetic makeup, virulence factors, and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles, which can affect their ability to cause disease and respond to treatment. As such, understanding C. difficile epidemiology is increasingly important to allow for effective prevention measures. Despite the heightened epidemiological surveillance of C. difficile over the past two decades, it remains challenging to accurately estimate the burden and international epidemiological trends given the lack of concerted global effort for surveillance, especially in low- and middle-income countries. This review summarizes the changing epidemiology of C. difficile based on available data within the last decade, highlights the pertinent ribotypes from a global perspective, and discusses evolving treatments for CDI.

INTRODUCTION: We describe female authorship trends in gastroenterology (GI) randomized controlled trial literature as a novel focus on gender bias in academic GI. METHODS: Using a systematic PubMed search, we extracted GI randomized controlled trial reports published from 2011 to 2022. We describe time trends in proportions of females among first and last authors overall and within GI subspecialties and high-impact journals. RESULTS: The proportion of females increased from 25.4% to 36.8% and from 14.3% to 24.8% among first and last authors, respectively. Smaller increases in female authorship occurred in most subgroups, although there were proportionately fewer females among authors in high-impact journals and advanced therapeutic endoscopy publications. DISCUSSION: Over the past decade, female authorship in GI RCT reports has increased. However, female representation, particularly among senior authors and in high-impact journals, remains significantly lower. Despite recent improvements, female still constitutes a minority of the authors of original GI RCTs.

Mast cells contain an abundance of tryptase, and preclinical models have shown elevated serum mast cell tryptase (SMCT) in the setting of posttraumatic joint contractures. Therefore, SMCT emerged as a potential biomarker to help recognize patients with more severe injuries and a higher likelihood of developing contractures. The objective of this study is to assess SMCT levels in participants with varying severity of elbow fractures and/or dislocations. A prospective cohort including 13 participants with more severe injuries that required an operation and 28 participants with less severe injuries managed nonoperatively were evaluated. A control group of eight individuals without elbow injuries was also evaluated. The SMCT levels were measured using an enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay kit specific for human mast cell tryptase. A one‐way analysis of variance and Tukey's Honest Significance test was used to assess for statistical significance among and between the three groups. The average time from injury to the collection of the blood samples was 4 ± 2 days. Highly significant differences were identified between the operative, nonoperative, and control groups (P = .0005). In the operative group, SMCT levels were significantly higher than the nonoperative group (P = .0005) and the control group (P = .009), suggesting a correlation between SMCT levels and injury severity. There was no statistically significant difference in SMCT levels between the nonoperative and control groups. The SMCT levels were elevated in participants with acute elbow injuries requiring operative intervention, suggesting that SMCT levels were higher in injuries regarded as more severe.