Luz S. Marin

Prof. Dr. Luz S. Marin


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2019 in Safety Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LMLuz S. Marin
Luz S. Marin
HLHester Lipscomb
Hester Lipscomb
MCManuel Cifuentes
Manuel Cifuentes
LPLaura Punnett
Laura Punnett

1 August 2017 in Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LMLuz S. Marin
Luz S. Marin
CRCora Roelofs
Cora Roelofs
Hispanic workers may be more likely to experience a deficient safety climate on construction worksites and it may account for their disproportionate injury rates. As part of a large study, the authors developed and implemented a 5-h training program to improve construction supervisors’ safety-efficacy, in order to enhance the safety climate on construction worksites. The training program covered fall prevention, silica exposure, leadership, communication, and safety planning. This study evaluated pretraining and posttraining changes and safety-efficacy six months posttraining. A total of 118 supervisors, contractors, and workers from more than 50 construction firms in Massachusetts attended the training. Statistically significant improvements were observed in participants’ safety knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Six-months postintervention, 58% of supervisors, contractors, or both, perceived that the training contributed “a lot” to their ability to communicate effectively with Spanish-speaking workers, to take on a safety leadership role (52%), and to conduct effective training (62%). This study determined that when supervisors perceive that they have the knowledge, skills, and confidence to make changes, they may better fulfill their role as a safety leader. Construction supervisor training courses might be revised to include leadership and effective communication topics.

20 June 2017 in Annals of Work Exposures and Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LMLuz S. Marin
Luz S. Marin
ARAndres C. Rodriguez
Andres C. Rodriguez
EREstefany Rey-Becerra
Estefany Rey-Becerra
HPHugo Piedrahita
Hugo Piedrahita
LBLope H. Barrero
Lope H. Barrero
PJPeter Johnson
Peter Johnson
This study characterized whole-body vibration exposures in a set of vehicles that operate in open-pit mines and compared three different daily exposure parameters based on the ISO 2631-1:1997 and ISO 2631–5:2004 standards. Full-shift, 6 to 12-hour, continuous whole-body vibration measurements were collected from 11 representative types of vehicles in terms of hours of operation and number of vehicles used. For each type of vehicle, the exposure parameters (A(8), VDV(8), and Sed(8)) were calculated for each axis (x, y, and z), and in addition, shear or horizontal (∑xy) and vector sum (∑xyx) whole-body vibration exposure. Findings showed that: (i) substantially higher shear and vector sum whole-body vibration exposures indicated relatively high levels of exposure on the non-predominant axis; (ii) the predominant axis of exposure varied across the different type of vehicles; (iii) there were differences in whole-body vibration exposure parameters regarding the standards-based predictions of potentially adverse health outcomes (the impulsive exposure parameters VDV(8) and Sed(8) were higher and reduced acceptable vehicle operation times by one-half to two-thirds relative to A(8) exposures); and (iv) based on the predominant exposures and the time to reach daily vibration action limits, the operation of most mining vehicles would be limited to less than 8 hours a day. Differences in whole-body vibration exposure parameters impact the prediction of potentially adverse health outcomes and may introduce some uncertainty regarding how to best characterize a vehicle operator’s actual exposure.


19 August 2019 in Journal of Chemical Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CAClara Rosalia Alvarez-Chavez
Clara Rosalia Alvarez-Chavez
LMLuz S. Marin
Luz S. Marin
KPKarla Perez-Gamez
Karla Perez-Gamez
MPMariona Portell
Mariona Portell
LVLuis Velazquez
Luis Velazquez
FMFrancisca Munoz-Osuna
Francisca Munoz-Osuna

6 July 2015 in International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LMLuz S. Marin
Luz S. Marin
MCManuel Cifuentes
Manuel Cifuentes
CRCora Roelofs
Cora Roelofs
Hispanic construction workers experience high rates of occupational injury, likely influenced by individual, organizational, and social factors. To characterize the safety climate of Hispanic construction workers using worker, contractor, and supervisor perceptions of the workplace. We developed a 40-item interviewer-assisted survey with six safety climate dimensions and administered it in Spanish and English to construction workers, contractors, and supervisors. A safety climate model, comparing responses and assessing contributing factors was created based on survey responses. While contractors and construction supervisors’ (n = 128) scores were higher, all respondents shared a negative perception of safety climate. Construction workers had statistically significantly lower safety climate scores compared to supervisors and contractors (30·6 vs 46·5%, P<0·05). Safety climate scores were not associated with English language ability or years lived in the United States. We found that Hispanic construction workers in this study experienced a poor safety climate. The Hispanic construction safety climate model we propose can serve as a framework to guide organizational safety interventions and evaluate safety climate improvements.