Spencer Martin

Dr. Spencer Martin

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 April 2014 in Genome Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBScott Derek Brown
Scott Derek Brown
RWRené L. Warren
René L. Warren
EGEwan A. Gibb
Ewan A. Gibb
SMSpencer Martin
Spencer Martin
JSJohn J. Spinelli
John J. Spinelli
RHRobert Holt
Robert Holt
Somatic missense mutations can initiate tumorogenesis and, conversely, anti-tumor cytotoxic T cell (CTL) responses. Tumor genome analysis has revealed extreme heterogeneity among tumor missense mutation profiles, but their relevance to tumor immunology and patient outcomes has awaited comprehensive evaluation. Here, for 515 patients from six tumor sites, we used RNA-seq data from The Cancer Genome Atlas to identify mutations that are predicted to be immunogenic in that they yielded mutational epitopes presented by the MHC proteins encoded by each patient’s autologousHLA-Aalleles. Mutational epitopes were associated with increased patient survival. Moreover, the corresponding tumors had higher CTL content, inferred fromCD8Agene expression, and elevated expression of the CTL exhaustion markersPDCD1andCTLA4. Mutational epitopes were very scarce in tumors without evidence of CTL infiltration. These findings suggest that the abundance of predicted immunogenic mutations may be useful for identifying patients likely to benefit from checkpoint blockade and related immunotherapies.

20 November 2012 in British Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NWN R West
N R West
SKS E Kost
S E Kost
SMSpencer Martin
Spencer Martin
KMKaty Milne
Katy Milne
RDR J Deleeuw
R J Deleeuw
PWP H Watson
P H Watson
Background: Methods: Results: Conclusion:

1 March 2014 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DWDarin A. Wick
Darin A. Wick
JWJohn R. Webb
John R. Webb
JNJulie S. Nielsen
Julie S. Nielsen
SMSpencer Martin
Spencer Martin
DKDavid R. Kroeger
David R. Kroeger
BNBrad H. Nelson
Brad H. Nelson
Purpose: Cancers accumulate mutations over time, each of which brings the potential for recognition by the immune system. We evaluated T-cell recognition of the tumor mutanome in patients with ovarian cancer undergoing standard treatment.Experimental Design: Tumor-associated T cells from 3 patients with ovarian cancer were assessed by ELISPOT for recognition of nonsynonymous mutations identified by whole exome sequencing of autologous tumor. The relative levels of mutations and responding T cells were monitored in serial tumor samples collected at primary surgery and first and second recurrence.Results: The vast majority of mutations (78/79) were not recognized by tumor-associated T cells; however, a highly specific CD8+ T-cell response to the mutation hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase–like protein 1 (HSDL1)L25V was detected in one patient. In the primary tumor, the HSDL1L25V mutation had low prevalence and expression, and a corresponding T-cell response was undetectable. At first recurrence, there was a striking increase in the abundance of the mutation and corresponding MHC class I epitope, and this was accompanied by the emergence of the HSDL1L25V-specific CD8+ T-cell response. At second recurrence, the HSDL1L25V mutation and epitope continued to be expressed; however, the corresponding T-cell response was no longer detectable.Conclusion: The immune system can respond to the evolving ovarian cancer genome. However, the T-cell response detected here was rare, was transient, and ultimately failed to prevent disease progression. These findings reveal the limitations of spontaneous tumor immunity in the setting of standard treatments and suggest a high degree of ignorance of tumor mutations that could potentially be reversed by immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res; 20(5); 1125–34. ©2013 AACR.

18 May 2016 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SMSpencer Martin
Spencer Martin
SBScott Derek Brown
Scott Derek Brown
DWDarin A Wick
Darin A Wick
JNJulie S Nielsen
Julie S Nielsen
DKDavid R Kroeger
David R Kroeger
BNBrad H Nelson
Brad H Nelson
Due to advances in sequencing technology, somatically mutated cancer antigens, or neoantigens, are now readily identifiable and have become compelling targets for immunotherapy. In particular, neoantigen-targeted vaccines have shown promise in several pre-clinical and clinical studies. However, to date, neoantigen-targeted vaccine studies have involved tumors with exceptionally high mutation burdens. It remains unclear whether neoantigen-targeted vaccines will be broadly applicable to cancers with intermediate to low mutation burdens, such as ovarian cancer. To address this, we assessed whether a derivative of the murine ovarian tumor model ID8 could be targeted with neoantigen vaccines. We performed whole exome and transcriptome sequencing on ID8-G7 cells. We identified 92 somatic mutations, 39 of which were transcribed, missense mutations. For the 17 top predicted MHC class I binding mutations, we immunized mice subcutaneously with synthetic long peptide vaccines encoding the relevant mutation. Seven of 17 vaccines induced robust mutation-specific CD4 and/or CD8 T cell responses. However, none of the vaccines prolonged survival of tumor-bearing mice in either the prophylactic or therapeutic setting. Moreover, none of the neoantigen-specific T cell lines recognized ID8-G7 tumor cells in vitro, indicating that the corresponding mutations did not give rise to bonafide MHC-presented epitopes. Additionally, bioinformatic analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas data revealed that only 12% (26/220) of HGSC cases had a ≥90% likelihood of harboring at least one authentic, naturally processed and presented neoantigen versus 51% (80/158) of lung cancers. Our findings highlight the limitations of applying neoantigen-targeted vaccines to tumor types with intermediate/low mutation burdens.

1 May 2014 in Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMargaret L. McKinnon
Margaret L. McKinnon
JRJacob Rozmus
Jacob Rozmus
SFShan-Yu Fung
Shan-Yu Fung
AHAaron F. Hirschfeld
Aaron F. Hirschfeld
KBKate L. Del Bel
Kate L. Del Bel
STStuart E. Turvey
Stuart E. Turvey

14 September 2015 in Annals of Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SMSpencer Martin
Spencer Martin
GCG. Coukos
G. Coukos
RHRobert Holt
Robert Holt
BNB. H. Nelson
B. H. Nelson
Owing to recent advances in genomic technologies, personalized oncology is poised to fundamentally alter cancer therapy. In this paradigm, the mutational and transcriptional profiles of tumors are assessed, and personalized treatments are designed based on the specific molecular abnormalities relevant to each patient's cancer. To date, such approaches have yielded impressive clinical responses in some patients. However, a major limitation of this strategy has also been revealed: the vast majority of tumor mutations are not targetable by current pharmacological approaches. Immunotherapy offers a promising alternative to exploit tumor mutations as targets for clinical intervention. Mutated proteins can give rise to novel antigens (called neoantigens) that are recognized with high specificity by patient T cells. Indeed, neoantigen-specific T cells have been shown to underlie clinical responses to many standard treatments and immunotherapeutic interventions. Moreover, studies in mouse models targeting neoantigens, and early results from clinical trials, have established proof of concept for personalized immunotherapies targeting next-generation sequencing identified neoantigens. Here, we review basic immunological principles related to T-cell recognition of neoantigens, and we examine recent studies that use genomic data to design personalized immunotherapies. We discuss the opportunities and challenges that lie ahead on the road to improving patient outcomes by incorporating immunotherapy into the paradigm of personalized oncology.