(1) Background: The activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)- based clot waveform analysis (CWA) quantitatively extends information obtained from the APTT waveform through its derivatives. However, pre-analytical variables including reagent effects on the CWA parameters are poorly understood and must be standardized as a potential diagnostic assay. (2) Methods: CWA was first analysed with patient samples to understand reagent lot variation in three common APTT reagents: Pathromtin SL, Actin FS, and Actin FSL. A total of 1055 healthy volunteers were also recruited from seven institutions across the Asia-Pacific region and CWA data were collected with the Sysmex CS analysers. (3) Results: CWA parameters varied less than 10% between lots and the linear mixed model analysis showed few site-specific effects within the same reagent group. However, the CWA parameters were significantly different amongst all reagent groups and thus reagent-specific 95% reference intervals could be calculated using the nonparametric method. Post-hoc analysis showed some degree of influence by age and gender with weak correlation to the CWA (r < 0.3). (4) Conclusions: Reagent type significantly affects APTT-based CWA with minimal inter-laboratory variations with the same coagulometer series that allow for data pooling across laboratories with more evidence required for age- and gender-partitioning.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are establishing themselves as principle choices for the treatment of a variety of thrombotic disorders. DOACs are also known to affect common coagulation tests which are routinely performed for patients in clinical practice. An understanding of their varied effects is crucial for the appropriate ordering of coagulation tests and their interpretation. Laboratories in public and private healthcare institutions and commercial sectors were surveyed on coagulation tests offered and their methods. A Medline and bibliography search, including a search on search engines, was performed for publications reporting the effects of dabigatran, apixaban and rivaroxaban on these coagulation tests. These papers were reviewed and summarised for consensus recommendations. Prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) are variably affected by the DOACs and dependent of the coagulation assays used. Clinicians must know which laboratory has performed these tests to logically interpret test results. A normal PT or aPTT does not exclude the presence of residual DOACs effect. The thrombin time is sensitive to dabigatran but not apixaban or rivaroxaban. Specialised coagulation tests such as thrombophilia tests are also variably affected by the DOACs. All laboratories in Singapore however, employ similar test methods permitting a common set of recommendations for specialised coagulation testing. Knowledge of the effects of DOACs on coagulation testing is essential to determine the appropriateness of performing such tests and interpreting them coherently. Practical recommendations which are tests and location-specific are set out in this paper.