Dysphagia is a common geriatric syndrome that might induce serious complications and death. Standard diagnostics using the Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study (VFSS) or Fiberoptic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) are expensive and expose patients to risks, while bedside screening is subjective and might lack reliability. An affordable and accessible instrumented screening is necessary. This study aimed to evaluate the classification performance of Transformer models and convolutional networks in identifying swallowing and non-swallowing tasks through depth video data. Different activation functions (ReLU, LeakyReLU, GELU, ELU, SiLU, and GLU) were then evaluated on the best-performing model. Sixty-five healthy participants (n = 65) were invited to perform swallowing (eating a cracker and drinking water) and non-swallowing tasks (a deep breath and pronouncing vowels: “/eɪ/”, “/iː/”, “/aɪ/”, “/oʊ/”, “/u:/”). Swallowing and non-swallowing were classified by Transformer models (TimeSFormer, Video Vision Transformer (ViViT)), and convolutional neural networks (SlowFast, X3D, and R(2+1)D), respectively. In general, convolutional neural networks outperformed the Transformer models. X3D was the best model with good-to-excellent performance (F1-score: 0.920; adjusted F1-score: 0.885) in classifying swallowing and non-swallowing conditions. Moreover, X3D with its default activation function (ReLU) produced the best results, although LeakyReLU performed better in deep breathing and pronouncing “/aɪ/” tasks. Future studies shall consider collecting more data for pretraining and developing a hyperparameter tuning strategy for activation functions and the high dimensionality video data for Transformer models.

The objective of this review was to summarize the applications of sonoelastography in testicular tumor identification and inquire about their test performances. Two authors independently searched English journal articles and full conference papers from CINAHL, Embase, IEEE Xplore^®, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception and organized them into a PIRO (patient, index test, reference test, outcome) framework. Eleven studies (n = 11) were eligible for data synthesis, nine of which (n = 9) utilized strain elastography and two (n = 2) employed shear-wave elastography. Meta-analyses were performed on the distinction between neoplasm (tumor) and non-neoplasm (non-tumor) from four study arms and between malignancy and benignity from seven study arms. The pooled sensitivity of classifying malignancy and benignity was 86.0% (95%CI, 79.7% to 90.6%). There was substantial heterogeneity in the classification of neoplasm and non-neoplasm and in the specificity of classifying malignancy and benignity, which could not be addressed by the subgroup analysis of sonoelastography techniques. Heterogeneity might be associated with the high risk of bias and applicability concern, including a wide spectrum of testicular pathologies and verification bias in the reference tests. Key technical obstacles in the index test were manual compression in strain elastography, qualitative observation of non-standardized color codes, and locating the Regions of Interest (ROI), in addition to decisions in feature extractions. Future research may focus on multiparametric sonoelastography using deep learning models and ensemble learning. A decision model on the benefits–risks of surgical exploration (reference test) could also be developed to direct the test-and-treat strategy for testicular tumors.

Biomechanical studies play an important role in understanding the pathophysiology of sleep disorders and providing insights to maintain sleep health. Computational methods facilitate a versatile platform to analyze various biomechanical factors in silico, which would otherwise be difficult through in vivo experiments. The objective of this review is to examine and map the applications of computational biomechanics to sleep-related research topics, including sleep medicine and sleep ergonomics. A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Research gaps were identified through data synthesis on variants, outcomes, and highlighted features, as well as evidence maps on basic modeling considerations and modeling components of the eligible studies. Twenty-seven studies (n = 27) were categorized into sleep ergonomics (n = 2 on pillow; n = 3 on mattress), sleep-related breathing disorders (n = 19 on obstructive sleep apnea), and sleep-related movement disorders (n = 3 on sleep bruxism). The effects of pillow height and mattress stiffness on spinal curvature were explored. Stress on the temporomandibular joint, and therefore its disorder, was the primary focus of investigations on sleep bruxism. Using finite element morphometry and fluid–structure interaction, studies on obstructive sleep apnea investigated the effects of anatomical variations, muscle activation of the tongue and soft palate, and gravitational direction on the collapse and blockade of the upper airway, in addition to the airflow pressure distribution. Model validation has been one of the greatest hurdles, while single-subject design and surrogate techniques have led to concerns about external validity. Future research might endeavor to reconstruct patient-specific models with patient-specific loading profiles in a larger cohort. Studies on sleep ergonomics research may pave the way for determining ideal spine curvature, in addition to simulating side-lying sleep postures. Sleep bruxism studies may analyze the accumulated dental damage and wear. Research on OSA treatments using computational approaches warrants further investigation.