Feature level based monomodal biometric systems perform person recognition based on a multiple sources of biometric information and are affected by problems like integration of evidence obtained from multiple cues and normalization of features codes since they are heterogeneous, in addition of monomodal biometric systems problems like noisy sensor data, non-universality and lack of individuality of the chosen biometric trait, absence of an invariant representation for the biometric trait and susceptibility to circumvention. Some of these problems can be alleviated by using multimodal biometric systems that consolidate evidence from scores of multiple biometric systems. In this work, we address two important issues related to score level fusion. We have studied the performance of a score level fusion based multimodal biometric system against different monomodal biometric system based on voice, fingerprint modalities and a bimodal biometric system based on feature level fusion of the same modalities. These systems have been evaluated in terms of their efficiency and identification rate on a close group from the test data. These results are shown using cumulative match characteristic curve.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and infectious diseases prediction have recently experienced a common development and advancement. Machine learning (ML) apparition, along with deep learning (DL) emergence, extended many approaches against diseases apparition and their spread. And despite their outstanding results in predicting infectious diseases, conflicts appeared regarding the types of data used and how they can be studied, analyzed, and exploited using various emerging methods. This has led to some ongoing discussions in the field. This research aims not only to provide an overview of what has been accomplished, but also to highlight the difficulties related to the types of data used, and the learning methods applied for each research objective. It categorizes these contributions into three areas: predictions using Public Health Data to prevent the spread of a transmissible disease within a region; predictions using Patients' Medical Data to detect whether a person is infected by a transmissible disease; and predictions using both Public and patient medical data to estimate the extent of disease spread in a population. The paper also critically assesses the potential of AI and outlines its limitations in infectious disease management.
8 January 2025 in Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Informatica
Artificial Intelligence and infectious diseases prediction have recently experienced a common development and advancement. Machine learning apparition, along with deep learning emergence, extended many approaches against diseases apparition and their spread. And despite their outstanding results in predicting infectious diseases, conflicts appeared regarding the types of data used and how they can be studied, analyzed, and exploited using various emerging methods. This has led to some ongoing discussions in the field. This research aims not only to provide an overview of what has been accomplished, but also to highlight the difficulties related to the types of data used, and the learning methods applied for each research objective. It categorizes these contributions into three areas: predictions using Public Health Data to prevent the spread of a transmissible disease within a region; predictions using Patients’ Medical Data to detect whether a person is infected by a transmissible disease; and predictions using both Public and patient medical data to estimate the extent of disease spread in a population. The paper also critically assesses the potential of Artificial Intelligence and outlines its limitations in infectious disease management.