Background: Serum lactate dehydrogenase levels reflect disease status in a variety of organs, but its role in indicating pulmonary function is not yet clear. Therefore, this study explored the correlation between pulmonary function and serum lactate dehydrogenase, and investigated thresholds for changes in pulmonary function indicators in the total population as well as in different strata of the population. Methods: Based on data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011–2012 (n = 3453), univariate and stratified analyses were performed to investigate factors associated with pulmonary function, and multiple regression analysis was used to further investigate the specific relationship with serum lactate dehydrogenase. Smoothed curve fitting, threshold effect and saturation effect analysis were used to explore the threshold level of serum lactate dehydrogenase at the onset of changes in pulmonary function indicators. Results: Adjusted smoothed curve fit plots showed a linear relationship between serum lactate dehydrogenase levels and forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in one second: for each 1 U/L increase in serum lactate dehydrogenase levels, forced vital capacity decreased by 1.24 mL (95% CI = -2.05, -0.42, P = 0.0030) and forced expiratory volume in one second by 1.11 mL (95% CI = -1.82, -0.39, P = 0.0025). Conclusions: Serum lactate dehydrogenase was negatively and linearly correlated with pulmonary function indices in the total population analyzed. Based on the total population and different population stratifications, this study determined the threshold values of serum lactate dehydrogenase at the onset of decline of pulmonary function in different populations. This provides a new serological monitoring indicator for patients suffering from respiratory diseases and has implications for patients with possible clinical impairment of pulmonary function. However, our cross-sectional study was not able to determine a causal relationship between these two factors, and further research is needed.

Objective: Elderly people are less likely than younger patients to undergo curative surgery for early-stage lung cancer because of the greater risk of surgery and postoperative complications. We investigated the relationship between treatment modality and the risk of all-cause and lung cancer-specific mortality to compare the efficacy of surgical treatment with radiotherapy in patients with stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were ≥80 years old.Methods: We extracted data from the most recent Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 9 registry study database (2010–2017). We mainly selected patients with stage I and II NSCLC who were ≥80 years old, and after screening, 7,045 cases were selected for our study. We used univariate analysis, stratified analysis, and multiple regression equation analysis to examine all-cause mortality and lung cancer-specific mortality in different treatment modalities. The overall and stratified populations' survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan–Meier method. The competing risk regression method of Fine and Gray was used to estimate mortality specific to lung cancer.Results: In the fully adjusted model, all-cause mortality was 1.97 times higher in the radiotherapy-only group (hazard ration (HR) = 1.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.81–2.14, p < 0.0001) than in the surgery-only group. The lung cancer-specific mortality rate was 1.22 times higher in the radiotherapy-only group (HR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.13–1.32, p < 0.0001) than in the surgery-only group. The median overall survival (OS) in the surgery-only, radiation therapy-only, surgery plus radiation therapy, and no-treatment groups were 58 months, 31 months, 36 months, and 10 months, respectively. Median lung cancer-specific survival was 61 months, 32 months, 38 months, and 11 months, respectively. The surgery-only group had the highest 1-year OS (0.8679,95% CI = 0.8537–0.8824) and 5-year OS (0.4873, 95% CI = 0.4632–0.5126).Conclusions: Surgery had a higher overall and lung cancer-specific survival rate than radiotherapy and no treatment in the elderly early-stage NSCLC population. For patients with stage I and stage II NSCLC at advanced ages, surgical treatment might have a greater potential survival benefit.

BackgroundLymph node (LN) metastasis is crucial in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) prognosis and treatment, but the TNM system lacks LN quantity consideration. Our goal is to investigate the role of positive LNs (nPLN) and positive LN rate (LNR) in overall survival (OS) and assess whether they offer higher value in prognostic assessment of NSCLC than N-stage.MethodsPatients were stratified into four subgroups using X-Tile software. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method, univariate analysis, and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Model performance was evaluated using the Harrell consistency index (C-index), Akaike information criterion (AIC), and Bayesian information criterion (BIC). The prognostic performance of the nodal classification was validated using overall survival as the endpoint.ResultsThe survival curves demonstrate distinct disparities between each nPLN and LNR category. A pronounced trend toward deteriorating overall survival from N-PLN 1 to N-PLN 2+ was observed across all tumor size categories. However, the differences between each LNR category were only significant for tumors & LE;3 cm and 5-7 cm. Notably, both nPLN and LNR classifications displayed a higher C-index, lower AIC, and lower BIC compared with the N staging. Furthermore, the LNR classification provided superior prognostic stratification when compared with the nPLN classification.ConclusionsOur results demonstrate that nPLN and LNR classifications may offer improved prognostic performance compared with the current N classification for LN-positive NSCLC patients. Nonetheless, more studies are needed to assess the feasibility of incorporating these classifications into the next TNM staging system. In this paper, we report on that the significant prognostic value of number of positive lymph nodes (nPLN) and lymph nodes rate (LNR) in predicting survival outcomes for LN-positive NSCLC patients who undergo surgery and these classifications may offer improved prognostic performance compared with the current N classification.image

The study titled "Effect of Wearing Glasses on Risk of Infection With SARS-CoV-2 in the Community - A Randomized Clinical Trial" by Fretheim et al drew our attention. This prospective clinical trial examined the impact of eyeglass usage on COVID-19 risk. By surveying 3717 participants, the authors concluded that wearing glasses in the community does not offer protection against COVID-19. However, we have concerns regarding the study's methodology. Respiratory viruses primarily infect individuals through the respiratory route, with masks being the primary protective measure. Eyeglasses play a secondary role. The study's low percentage of mask-wearing participants, coupled with the significant disparity in mask adoption between the intervention and control groups, may have influenced the results. Additionally, the authors failed to account for variations in outdoor activity duration between the groups, potentially introducing bias. While previous studies indicated a protective effect of eyeglasses against viral infections, this study's findings contradict that notion. The variation could be attributed to different viral strains and their modes of transmission. The authors acknowledge this in their discussion. Although the study demonstrates the relationship between eyeglass wear and neocoronavirus infection, improvements in methodology and result interpretation are necessary. Further insights from the authors would contribute to a more comprehensive evaluation of the findings.