Basile Tessier-Cloutier

Dr. Basile Tessier-Cloutier

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 March 2020 in Laboratory Investigation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BTBasile Tessier-Cloutier
Basile Tessier-Cloutier
KKKim E. Kortekaas
Kim E. Kortekaas
ETEmily Thompson
Emily Thompson
JPJennifer Pors
Jennifer Pors
JCJulia Chen
Julia Chen
LHLynn Hoang
Lynn Hoang

19 July 2020 in The Journal of Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ALAdrian B. Levine
Adrian B. Levine
JPJason Peng
Jason Peng
DFDavid Farnell
David Farnell
MNMitchell Nursey
Mitchell Nursey
YWYiping Wang
Yiping Wang
ABAli Bashashati
Ali Bashashati

12 June 2019 in The Journal of Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VLVivian Lac
Vivian Lac
TNTayyebeh M. Nazeran
Tayyebeh M. Nazeran
BTBasile Tessier-Cloutier
Basile Tessier-Cloutier
RARosalia Aguirre‐Hernandez
Rosalia Aguirre‐Hernandez
AAArianne Albert
Arianne Albert
DHDavid Huntsman
David Huntsman

30 October 2020 in The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BTBasile Tessier-Cloutier
Basile Tessier-Cloutier
MCMackenzie Coatham
Mackenzie Coatham
MCMark Carey
Mark Carey
GNGregg S Nelson
Gregg S Nelson
SHSarah Hamilton
Sarah Hamilton
CLCheng-Han Lee
Cheng-Han Lee
Dedifferentiated/undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma (DDEC/UEC) is an endometrial cancer characterized by the presence of histologically undifferentiated carcinoma. Genomic inactivation of core switch/sucrose nonfermentable (SWI/SNF) complex proteins was recently identified in approximately two‐thirds of DDEC/UEC. The aim of this study was to delineate the clinical behavior of SWI/SNF‐deficient DDEC/UEC in comparison to SWI/SNF‐intact DDEC/UEC. The study cohort consisted of 56 SWI/SNF‐deficient DDEC/UEC (2 POLE‐mutated), which showed either SMARCA4 (BRG1) loss, ARID1A/1B co‐loss, or SMARCB1 (INI1) loss in the undifferentiated tumor, and 26 SWI/SNF‐intact DDEC/UEC (4 POLE‐mutated). The average age at diagnosis was 61 years for patients with SWI/SNF‐deficient tumors and 64 years for SWI/SNF‐intact tumors. Mismatch repair (MMR) protein deficiency was seen in 66% of SWI/SNF‐deficient and 50% of SWI/SNF‐intact tumors. At initial presentation, 55% of patients with SWI/SNF‐deficient tumors had extrauterine disease spread in contrast to 38% of patients with SWI/SNF‐intact tumors. The 2‐year disease specific survival (DSS) for stages I and II disease was 65% for SWI/SNF deficient tumors relative to 100% for SWI/SNF‐intact tumors (p = 0.042). For patients with stages III and IV disease, the median survival was 4 months for SWI/SNF‐deficient tumors compared to 36 months for SWI/SNF‐intact tumors (p = 0.0003). All six patients with POLE‐mutated tumors, including one with stage IV SWI/SNF‐deficient tumor were alive with no evidence of disease. Among the patients with advanced stage SWI/SNF‐deficient tumors, 68% (21 of 31) received adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (platinum/taxane‐based) and all except the patient with a POLE‐mutated tumor (20 of 21) experienced disease progression either during chemotherapy or within 4 months after its completion. These findings show that core SWI/SNF‐deficiency defines a highly aggressive group of undifferentiated cancer characterized by rapid disease progression that is refractory to conventional platinum/taxane‐based chemotherapy. This underscores the importance of accurate clinical recognition of this aggressive tumor and the need to consider alternative systemic therapy for these tumors.

1 April 2020 in Histopathology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KKKim E Kortekaas
Kim E Kortekaas
NSNienke Solleveld‐Westerink
Nienke Solleveld‐Westerink
BTBasile Tessier-Cloutier
Basile Tessier-Cloutier
TRTessa A Rutten
Tessa A Rutten
MPMariëtte I E Poelgeest
Mariëtte I E Poelgeest
TBTjalling Bosse
Tjalling Bosse
Aims: The most commonly mutated gene in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) is TP53 and its prognostic value, particularly in HPV‐independent VSCC, is uncertain. In other tumours, p53 immunohistochemistry (IHC) is an excellent surrogate marker for TP53 mutations. In order to study this in VSCC, we assigned six p53 IHC patterns into two final classes: ‘wild‐type’ or ‘mutant’. We determined the performance and interobserver variability of this pattern‐based p53 IHC approach.Methods and results: Two experienced gynaecological pathologists scored the predefined p53 IHC patterns of 59 VSCC, independently and blinded for molecular data. Agreement was calculated by Cohen's kappa. All disagreements regarding p53 IHC patterns were resolved by a consensus meeting. After DNA isolation, the presence of pathogenic TP53 variants was determined by next‐generation sequencing (NGS). Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of p53 IHC as a surrogate marker for TP53 mutation status were calculated. Initial p53 IHC pattern interpretation showed substantial agreement between both observers (k = 0.71, P < 0.001). After consensus, 18 cases (30.5%) were assigned a final p53 IHC class as TP53 wild‐type and 41 cases (69.5%) as mutant. The accuracy between the p53 IHC class and TP53 mutation status, after the consensus meeting, was 96.6%. Moreover, the sensitivity and specificity were high 95.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 82.9–99.1% and 100% (95% CI = 75.9–100%)].Conclusions: Pattern‐based p53 IHC classification is highly reproducible among experienced gynaecological pathologists and accurately reflects TP53 mutations in VSCC. This approach to p53 IHC interpretation offers guidance and provides necessary clarity for resolving the proposed prognostic relevance of final p53 IHC class within HPV‐independent VSCC.

26 April 2018 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LPLeah M Prentice
Leah M Prentice
RMRuth R Miller
Ruth R Miller
JKJeff Knaggs
Jeff Knaggs
AMAlborz Mazloomian
Alborz Mazloomian
RHRosalia Aguirre Hernandez
Rosalia Aguirre Hernandez
BSBrandon S Sheffield
Brandon S Sheffield
Genomic analysis of cancer tissues is an essential aspect of personalized oncology treatment. Though it has been suggested that formalin fixation of patient tissues may be suboptimal for molecular studies, this tissue processing approach remains the industry standard. Therefore clinical molecular laboratories must be able to work with formalin fixed, paraffin embedded (FFPE) material. This study examines the effects of pre-analytic variables introduced by routine pathology processing on specimens used for clinical reports produced by next-generation sequencing technology. Tissue resected from three colorectal cancer patients was subjected to 2, 15, 24, and 48 hour fixation times in neutral buffered formalin. DNA was extracted from all tissues twice, once with uracil-N-glycosylase (UNG) treatment to counter deamination effects, and once without. Of note, deamination events at methylated cytosine, as found at CpG sites, remains unaffected by UNG. After extraction a two-step PCR targeted sequencing method was performed using the Illumina MiSeq and the data was analyzed via a custom-built bioinformatics pipeline, including filtration of reads with mapping quality T/A mutations that is not represented in DNA treated with UNG. This suggests these errors may be due to deamination events triggered by a longer fixation time. However the allelic frequency of these events remained below the limit of detection for reportable mutations in this assay (<2%). We do however recommend that suspected intratumoral heterogeneity events be verified by re-sequencing the same FFPE block.