Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet

Liposome nanoparticles have emerged as promising drug delivery systems due to their unique properties. Assessing particle size and polydispersity index (PDI) is critical for evaluating the quality of these liposomal nanoparticles. However, optimizing these parameters in a laboratory setting is both costly and time-consuming. This study aimed to apply a machine learning technique to assess the impact of specific factors, including sonication time, extrusion temperature, and compositions, on the size and PDI of liposomal nanoparticles. Liposomal solutions were prepared and subjected to sonication with varying values for these parameters. Two compositions: (A) HSPC:DPPG:Chol:DSPE-mPEG2000 at 55:5:35:5 molar ratio and (B) HSPC:Chol:DSPE-mPEG2000 at 55:40:5 molar ratio, were made using remote loading method. Ensemble learning (EL), a machine learning technique, was employed using the Least-squares boosting (LSBoost) algorithm to accurately model the data. The dataset was randomly split into training and testing sets, with 70% allocated for training. The LSBoost algorithm achieved mean absolute errors of 1.652 and 0.0105 for modeling the size and PDI, respectively. Under conditions where the temperature was set at approximately 60 °C, our EL model predicted a minimum particle size of 116.53 nm for composition (A) with a sonication time of approximately 30 min. Similarly, for composition (B), the model predicted a minimum particle size of 129.97 nm with sonication times of approximately 30 or 55 min. In most instances, a PDI of less than 0.2 was achieved. These results highlight the significant impact of optimizing independent factors on the characteristics of liposomal nanoparticles and demonstrate the potential of EL as a decision support system for identifying the best liposomal formulation. We recommend further studies to explore the effects of other independent factors, such as lipid composition and surfactants, on liposomal nanoparticle characteristics.

This paper provides a systematic literature review of CPOE evaluation studies in the outpatient setting on: safety; cost and efficiency; adherence to

Objective To systematically review the medical literature on the association between glucose variability measures and mortality in critically ill patients. Methods Studies assessing the association between a measure of glucose variability and mortality that reported original data from a clinical trial or observational study on critically ill adult patients were searched in Ovid MEDLINE^® and Ovid EMBASE^®. Data on patient populations, study designs, glucose regulations, statistical approaches, outcome measures, and glucose variability indicators (their definition and applicability) were extracted. Result Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria; 13 different indicators were used to measure glucose variability. Standard deviation and the presence of both hypo- and hyperglycemia were the most common indicators. All studies reported a statistically significant association between mortality and at least one glucose variability indicator. In four studies both blood glucose levels and severity of illness were considered as confounders, but only one of them checked model assumptions to assert inference validity. Conclusions Glucose variability has been quantified in many different ways, and in each study at least one of them appeared to be associated with mortality. Because of methodological limitations and the possibility of reporting bias, it is still unsettled whether and in which quantification this association is independent of other confounders. Future research will benefit from using an indicator reference subset for glucose variability, metrics that are linked more directly to negative physiological effects, more methodological rigor, and/or better reporting.