Given the shortcomings of current stone burden characterization (maximum diameter or ellipsoid formulas), we sought to investigate the diagnostic accuracy and precision of a University of California, Irvine (UCI) developed artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for determining stone volume determination. A total of 322 non-contrast computerized tomography scans (NCCT) were retrospectively obtained from patients with a diagnosis of urolithiasis. The largest stone in each NCCT scan was designated the "index stone". The 3D-volume of the index stone using 3D Slicer technology was determined by a validated reviewer; this was considered the "ground truth" volume. The AI-calculated index stone volume was subsequently compared with "ground truth" volume as well with the scalene, prolate and oblate-ellipsoid formulas estimated volumes. There was a nearly perfect correlation between the AI-determined volume and the ground truth (R=0.98). While the AI algorithm was efficient for determining the stone volume for all sizes, its accuracy improved with larger stone size. Moreover, the AI stone volume produced an excellent 3D pixel overlap with the "ground truth" (Dice score=0.90). In comparison, the ellipsoid formula-based volumes performed less well (R range:0.79-0.82) than the AI algorithm; for the ellipsoid formulas, the accuracy decreased as the stone size increased (mean overestimation:27% to 89%). Lastly, for all stone sizes, the maximum linear stone measurement had the poorest correlation with the "ground truth" (R range:0.41-0.82). The UCI AI algorithm is an accurate, precise, and time-efficient tool for determining stone volume. Expanding the clinical availability of this program could enable urologists to establish better guidelines for both the metabolic and surgical management of their urolithiasis patients.

Ureteral stent encrustation significantly limits indwelling time and can lead to downstream urological problems. However, no ideal polymeric biomaterials have been shown to completely resist encrustation in long-term urine exposure. Recently, 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA)-coated Pellethane was reported as a promising biomaterial resistant to encrustation. This study compared HEMA-coated Pellethane to commercially available stents under two different artificial urine environments. To evaluate the degree and composition of encrustation on HEMA-coated Pellethane, Boston Scientific Tria, Bard InLay Optima, Cook Universa Hydrogel, and Cook Black Silicone stents were used at various dwelling times in two different artificial urine environments. In a batch-flow model, samples of stents were suspended in an artificial urine solution (AUS) at 37 °C. Every 24 h for 11 weeks, 50% of the AUS would be replaced with fresh components using a programmable peristaltic pump system. The stent materials were removed at suitable time intervals and air-dried for 24 h under sterile conditions before follow-up analysis. SEM was used to assess the degree of encrustation, and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) was employed to quantify the encrusted compositions, specifically for calcium, magnesium, and phosphorus. We measured the weight gain over time due to encrusted deposits on the stents and quantified the amount of Ca, Mg, and P deposited on each encrusted stent. After the 11 week trial, HEMA-coated Pellethane showed the most average mass change. SEM showed that HEMA-coated Pellethane was fully encrusted in just 2 weeks in the AUS environments, and ICP-MS showed that Ca is the most abundant deposit. Among all the tested stents, Black Silicone performed the best. The two AUSs were formulated to encrust more rapidly than physiological conditions. HEMA-coated Pellethane is not an ideal stent material, while silicone is a promising material for advancing ureteral stents.

Introduction: Encrustation of implanted urinary tract devices is associated with significant morbidity. Pellethane ^® is a polyether-based compound noted for its strength, porosity, and resistance to solvents. We assessed Pellethane thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) with and without surface coatings 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether (TETRA) for the potential to resist encrustation in an artificial urine environment. Materials and Methods: Samples of Pellethane TPU, HEMA Pellethane TPU, TETRA Pellethane TPU, and hydrogel-coated ureteral stent (Cook ^® ) were suspended in a batch-flow model with an artificial urine solution (AUS). Every 48 hours for 90 days, 40% of the solution was replaced with fresh AUS. All samples were stored in a 37 ° C incubator. Subsequently, the samples were thoroughly dried for 48 hours before weighing. Scanning electron microscopy was used to assess the degree of encrustation. Nu-Attom Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) was used to determine the precise compositions of the encrustation specifically with regard to calcium, magnesium, and phosphate. Results: At the conclusion of the 90-day trial, the samples were analyzed, and the average mass changes were as follows: stent 63.78%, uncoated Pellethane TPU 11.50%, HEMA-coated Pellethane TPU 2.90%, and TETRA-coated Pellethane TPU 0.60%. Pellethane TPU products, and specifically those coated with HEMA and TETRA, exhibited less average mass increase and a lesser propensity to form encrustation than the traditional urinary tract stent. The mass increases noted on coated Pellethane devices were primarily ionic, whereas that of the stent was not. Conclusion: Pellethane, particularly with an HEMA-based preventative coating, may serve as a favorable alternative to traditional urinary stent material, providing its improved resistance to encrustation.

Purpose: Retrograde intrarenal surgery is the gold-standard treatment for most kidney stones. During ureteroscopy, ureteral access sheath insertion at forces greater than 8.0 Newtons (N) risks high-grade ureteral injury. To monitor force, our institution utilizes a unique, Bluetooth-equipped device (i.e., the University of California—Irvine Force Sensor). Given the unique nature of the force sensor, we sought to develop an inexpensive and accessible force sensor based on Boyle’s law and the specific amount of force required to compress an occluded 1.0 mL syringe. Materials and Methods: We evaluated three brands of 1.0 mL syringes. After setting the plunger at 1.0 mL, the syringe was occluded, and the syringe plunger was compressed. The syringe volume was recorded when the applied force on the plunger reached 4.0 N, 6.0 N, and 8.0 N. Multiple trials were performed to assess reliability and reproducibility. A method for applying this clinically was also developed. Results: The precise force thresholds identified for a 1.0 mL Luer-Lok™ Syringe (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) were 0.30 mL for 4.00 N, 0.20 mL for 6.00 N, and 0.15 mL for 8.00 N. The 1.0 mL Tuberculin Syringe and 1.0 mL Luer Slip Syringe were less precise, but compression from 1.0 to 0.40 mL, 0.25 mL, and 0.20 mL corresponded to force sensor readings that did not exceed 4.00 N, 6.00 N, and 8.00 N, respectively. Conclusions: Based on volume changes, 4.00 N, 6.00 N, and 8.00 N of force can be reliably and reproducibly achieved using an occluded 1.0 mL syringe.