Jun-Dong Zhu

Prof. Jun-Dong Zhu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 July 2024 in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NLNingChao Li
NingChao Li
CCChun Cui
Chun Cui
JXJing Xu
Jing Xu
MMManTian Mi
ManTian Mi
JWJian Wang
Jian Wang
JZJun-Dong Zhu
Jun-Dong Zhu

21 May 2023 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JYJining Yang
Jining Yang
HSHui Shen
Hui Shen
MMMantian Mi
Mantian Mi
JZJun-Dong Zhu
Jun-Dong Zhu
Rationale: Epidemiological studies that focus on the relationship between dietary isoflavone intake and the risk of breast cancer still lead to inconsistent conclusions. Herein, we conducted a meta-analysis of the latest studies to explore this issue. Method: We performed a systematic search using Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase from inception to August 2021. The robust error meta-regression (REMR) model and generalized least squares trend (GLST) model were used to establish dose–response relationships between isoflavones and breast cancer risk. Results: Seven cohort studies and 17 case-control studies were included in the meta-analysis, and the summary OR for breast cancer was 0.71 (95% CI 0.72–0.81) when comparing the highest to the lowest isoflavone intake. A subgroup analysis further showed that neither menopausal status nor ER status has a significant influence on the association between isoflavone intake and breast cancer risk, while the isoflavone intake doses and study design does. When the isoflavones exposure was less than 10 mg/day, no effects on breast cancer risk were detected. The inverse association was significant in the case-control studies but not in the cohort studies. In the dose–response meta-analysis of the cohort studies, we observed an inverse association between isoflavone intake and breast cancer: a 10 mg/day increase in isoflavone intake was related to reductions of 6.8% (OR = 0.932, 95% CI 0.90–0.96) and 3.2% (OR = 0.968, 95% CI 0.94–0.99) in breast cancer risk when using REMR and GLST, respectively. In the dose–response meta-analysis of the case-control studies, the inverse association for every 10 mg/day isoflavone intake was associated with breast cancer risk reductions by 11.7%. Conclusion: present evidence demonstrated that taking in dietary isoflavone is helpful in reducing the breast cancer risk.