Zrinka Šafarić Oremuš

Dr. Zrinka Šafarić Oremuš

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 June 2023 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZDZeljka Drmic
Zeljka Drmic
IBIvan Bandić
Ivan Bandić
SHSonja Hleb
Sonja Hleb
AKAndrea Kukoč
Andrea Kukoč
SSSanja Sakan
Sanja Sakan
AŠAndrej Šribar
Andrej Šribar
Severe COVID-19 pneumonia in which mechanical ventilation is unable to achieve adequate gas exchange can be treated with veno-venous ECMO, eliminating the need for aggressive mechanical ventilation which might promote ventilator-induced lung injury and increase mortality. In this retrospective observational study, 18 critically ill COVID-19 patients who were treated using V-V ECMO during an 11-month period in a tertiary COVID-19 hospital were analyzed. Biomarkers of inflammation and clinical features were compared between survivors and non-survivors. Survival rates were compared between patients receiving ECMO and propensity matched mechanically ventilated controls. There were 7 survivors and 11 non-survivors. The survivors were significantly younger, with a higher proportion of females, higher serum procalcitonin at ICU admission, and before initiation of ECMO they had significantly lower Murray scores, PaCO2, WBC counts, serum ferritin levels, and higher glomerular filtration rates. No significant difference in mortality was found between patients treated with ECMO compared to patients treated using conventional lung protective ventilation. Hypercapnia, leukocytosis, reduced glomerular filtration rate, and increased serum ferritin levels prior to initiation of V-V ECMO in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia may be early warning signs of reduced chance of survival. Further multicentric studies are needed to confirm these findings.

22 March 2025 in Life
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZOZrinka Šafarić Oremuš
Zrinka Šafarić Oremuš
NBNikola Bradic
Nikola Bradic
IGIvan Gospic
Ivan Gospic
IPIvana Presecki
Ivana Presecki
SSSanja Sakan
Sanja Sakan
IRIgor Rudez
Igor Rudez
Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) remains an essential treatment option for patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Open-heart surgery requires the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), which triggers an inflammatory response that can lead to end-organ dysfunction and severe complications. Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective α2-adrenergic agonist, is widely used in anesthesia and intensive care medicine for its sedative, analgesic, and sympatholytic properties. This study aimed to investigate whether dexmedetomidine exerts a clinically relevant anti-inflammatory effect in patients undergoing open-heart surgery and to determine the optimal dose. A prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted, including 60 patients randomized into three groups according to dexmedetomidine dose. Inflammatory markers (IL-6, TNF-α), renal function, and other clinical parameters were analyzed at multiple time points. Statistical analyses were performed to assess differences between the groups. Dexmedetomidine administration significantly affected TNF-α levels 12 h after CPB (p = 0.033), while previously reported suppression of IL-6 was not observed. Dexmedetomidine was associated with lower opioid consumption before extubation and showed a tendency to reduce postoperative delirium. Diuresis was significantly increased on the first postoperative day in dexmedetomidine-treated patients (p = 0.003), with no significant changes in other renal parameters. The incidence of atrial fibrillation was highest in the control group and lowest in the high-dose dexmedetomidine group, though this difference was not statistically significant. These results suggest that dexmedetomidine influences inflammatory and clinical outcomes; however, further research is needed to confirm its long-term benefits and optimal dosing strategies.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DBDavor Barić
Davor Barić
NSNikola Sliskovic
Nikola Sliskovic
GSGloria Sestan
Gloria Sestan
SGSavica Gjorgjievska
Savica Gjorgjievska
DUDaniel Unić
Daniel Unić
IRIgor Rudez
Igor Rudez
Surgical repair for regurgitant bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is promising but underutilized due to perceived complexities and lack of long-term data. This study evaluated the efficacy of valve-sparing root remodeling (VSRR) or isolated valve repair combined with calibrated external ring annuloplasty in BAV versus tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) patients. All patients operated on for aortic regurgitation and/or aneurysm at our institution between 2014 and 2022 were included and entered into the Aortic Valve Insufficiency and ascending aorta Aneurysm InternATiOnal Registry (AVIATOR). Patients with successful repair at index surgery (100% in the BAV group, 93% in the TAV group, p = 0.044) were included in a systemic follow-up with echocardiography at regular intervals. Among 132 patients, 58 were in the BAV (44%) and 74 in the TAV group (56%). There were no inter-group differences in preoperative patient characteristics, except BAV patients being significantly younger (47 ± 18 y vs. 60 ± 14 y, p < 0.001) and having narrower aortic roots at the level of sinuses (41 ± 6 mm vs. 46 ± 13 mm, p < 0.001) and sinotubular junctions (39 ± 10 mm vs. 42 ± 11, p = 0.032). No perioperative deaths were recorded. At four years, there was no significant difference in terms of overall survival (96.3% BAV vs. 97.2% TAV, p = 0.373), freedom from valve reintervention (85.2% BAV vs. 93.4% TAV, p = 0.905), and freedom from severe aortic regurgitation (94.1% BAV vs. 82.9% TAV, p = 0.222). Surgical repair of BAV combined with extra-aortic annuloplasty can be performed with low perioperative morbidity and mortality and excellent mid-term results which are comparable to TAV repair.

1 October 2025 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DKDarko Kristović
Darko Kristović
VMVerica Mikecin
Verica Mikecin
IPIvana Presečki
Ivana Presečki
ZOZrinka Šafarić Oremuš
Zrinka Šafarić Oremuš
NSNatasa Sojcic
Natasa Sojcic
AŠAndrej Šribar
Andrej Šribar
Background and Objectives: Enhancing recovery after cardiac surgery involves minimally invasive procedures, early extubation/mobilization, and swift discharge. While mechanical ventilation is often essential post-operation, prolonged invasive ventilation (IMV) increases mortality risk. Duration is influenced by patient factors (age and comorbidities), surgical complexity, and complications. Prognostic scores like EuroSCORE II, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and the vasoactive–inotropic score (VIS) help to predict ventilation needs. The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of pre-/post-operation factors and procedure type as predictors of ventilation time. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective cohort observational study analyzing factors affecting the duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation in elective cardiac surgical patients treated between 1 January and 31 December 2024 in a tertiary center in continental Croatia. Patients were stratified into two groups according to the duration of IMV: normal (first three quartiles) and prolonged (upper quartile). In total, 493 elective cardiac surgical patients operated on under general endotracheal anesthesia with sternotomy or mini-sternotomy were admitted postoperatively to the cardiovascular ICU and mechanically ventilated during the observed period, and 463 patients were included in the final analysis after the exclusion criteria had been applied. Results: The mean age was 64.7 ± 9.8 years, and 28.7% of the cohort were females while 71.3% were males. The median Charlton Comorbidity Index was 4 (IQR 3–5), the VIS was 2 (IQR 0–3), the SOFA score at ICU admission was 5 (IQR 3–6), and the adjusted SOFA score was 3 (IQR 2–4). In the multivariate logistic regression model, a significant effect of female sex (OR 1.98), age (OR 1.05), VIS (OR 1.05), and history of previous cardiac surgery (OR 6.67) on the duration of mechanical ventilation was observed. In the time-to-extubation multivariate analysis, there was a significant effect of re-do surgery (HR 3.70), corrected SOFA score (HR 1.14), and VIS (HR 1.05) on the duration of mechanical ventilation. There was no significant effect of the type of surgery (CABG, aorta, aortic valve, mitral/tricuspid valve, or other) or the amount of chest tube drainage on the duration of mechanical ventilation. Conclusions: A history of previous cardiac surgery and the vasoactive–inotropic score during the first 24 postoperative hours in the ICU are the strongest predictors of the duration of mechanical ventilation after elective cardiac surgery, with a statistically significant effect present in both the logistic regression model and hazard ratio analysis. Further analyses with more variables are warranted in the future to refine the prognostic model.

1 November 2024 in Cardiologia Croatica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NSNikola Slišković
Nikola Slišković
GSGloria Sestan
Gloria Sestan
DBDavor Barić
Davor Barić
DUDaniel Unić
Daniel Unić
JVJosip Varvodić
Josip Varvodić
IRIgor Rudez
Igor Rudez