Scoliosis and Scheuermann’s disease are common spinal deformities that affect a substantial population, particularly adolescents, often impacting their quality of life. This comprehensive review aims to present a detailed understanding of these conditions, their diagnosis, and various treatment strategies. Through an extensive exploration of current literature, the review discusses the etiology of these spinal deformities and the use of diagnostic tools such as X-rays and MRI. It further delves into the range of treatment options available, from conservative approaches such as physiotherapy and bracing to more invasive surgical interventions. The review underscores the necessity of an individualized treatment approach, taking into account factors such as the patient’s age, the severity of the curvature, and overall health. This all-encompassing perspective on scoliosis and Scheuermann’s disease will aid in evidence-based decision making in their management with the goal of improving patient outcomes.

Background: Patients with scoliosis often require multiple imaging modalities. The aim of this study was to find out whether primary diagnosis, including surgical planning, could be carried out entirely without computed tomography (CT) scans and whether follow-up could be replaced with alternative methods without the use of X-rays. In order to reduce the radiation exposure in the diagnosis and treatment of severe scoliosis, we expect to replace X-rays with radiation-free or less-intensive radiation examinations. This study protocol is interdisciplinary. Methods: A total of 50 male and female patients (children and adolescents, aged 7–18 years) treated for scoliosis will be analyzed. In addition to routine projection radiographs, preoperative CT, and/or X-ray stereoradiography (EOS) examinations, thin-slice 3D magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences will be retrospectively reformatted during the preoperative MRI examination. A three-dimensional back scan (video-raster stereography) and an intraoral scan will also be obtained. The following questions should be answered at the end of the project: (1) Can MRI examination with additional thin-slice 3D reconstruction answer all relevant questions for preoperative planning instead of CT? (2) Are EOS or whole-spine X-ray examinations in combination with MRI data sufficient for the evaluation of the pedicles and spinal deformity? (3) Does the Cobb angle in the radiograph correlate with the calculations from the back scanner image and can follow-up checks be replaced? (4) Are there any correlations between dental anomalies and scoliosis? Conclusions: Until now, pediatric patients with scoliosis have been diagnosed, monitored, and treated with numerous independent specialist disciplines, such as pediatricians, orthopedic surgeons, neurosurgeons, and general practitioners with different radiological issues. The aim of this project is to reduce radiation and lower perioperative risks by creating a preoperative and follow-up-related standard protocol in close interdisciplinary and targeted cooperation between all the specialist disciplines involved. In line with the holistic examination approach, the associated accompanying diseases and developmental disorders such as dental and neuronal malformations will also be examined. On the one hand, CT-based questions could be replaced with the reconstruction of thin-slice MRI sequences. In addition, it may be possible to use the three-dimensional back scan as an intermediate diagnostic procedure instead of X-rays in the monitoring of severe scoliosis. Insofar as correlations or causalities between scoliosis and occlusal anomalies, early orthodontic intervention could positively benefit the duration of therapy at a later stage.