Pelvic motion acting as a hinge between the spine and hips is essential to maintain proper balance during bipedalism. Pelvic rotation is recruited as a compensation mechanism when spinal malalignment occurs. This pelvic rotation can affect functional acetabular orientation, and consequently functional cup positioning if a total hip arthroplasty (THA) is needed. Pelvic retroversion, frequently associated with degenerative spinal changes, implies an increase of acetabular version. Patients with flexible lumbar spines (spine users) protect the hip joint. Patients with stiff, degenerated or fused lumbar spines (hip users) demand higher hip mobility, placing the THA at risk. Pelvises in retroversion place the THA at risk for anterior dislocation when standing. In contrast, pelvises in anteversion or with low pelvic incidence (PI) can place THA at risk for posterior dislocation when sitting. Try to set the cup in an anatomic position. However, bear in mind that low PI pelvises may need more acetabular ante-inclination, and high PI pelvises more acetabular retroversion. If surgery is needed, start first by addressing the hip, except in patients with compensation (high pelvic retroversion), who may need spine surgery first to place the pelvis, and consequently the acetabulum, in a proper position. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:522-533. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200032

Study Design.: A retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively in an adult spine deformity multicenter database. Objective.: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of adult scoliosis (AS) on the type of Roussouly sagittal shape in terms of classification applicability, scoliosis modification of a patient theoretical sagittal shape, and coronal-sagittal deformity associations. Summary of Background Data.: Roussouly described a four-type sagittal shape classification in healthy individuals, which has been also applied to patients with degenerative spinal disease. However, it remains uncertain if its principles can be applied to AS patients. Methods.: AS patients recorded in a prospective multicenter database of adult spinal deformity were included. Preoperative sagittal radiographs were analyzed using the KEOPS software to measure pelvic parameters, global sagittal alignment, and the various criteria used for the Roussouly classification. The different sagittal shape types were compared using the Chi-square and McNemars tests, and analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction. Results.: The classification was applicable to all of the 190 analyzed AS patients. In addition to Roussouly criteria, two parameters helped differentiate the different shapes: T10-L2 angle (24° ± 19 type-1; 14° ± 15 type-2; 3° ± 15 type-3; 0.4° ± 14 type-4; P < 0.001), and lordosis distribution index (90% ± 17 type-1; 83% ± 16 type-2; 73% ± 21 type-3; 63% ± 16 type-4; P < 0.001). AS changed the theoretical shape in 34% of the patients (P < 0.001). Curve etiology and curve pattern were not associated with any particular type of sagittal shape (P > 0.05). Type-1 was associated with older patients (P = 0.02), degenerative curves (P = 0.02), and greater PI-LL mismatch (P = 0.012). Types 3 to 4 were associated with younger age and idiopathic etiology (P < 0.001). Conclusion.: Roussouly four-type sagittal shape classification could be applied to AS patients. AS modified the theoretical type in one of every three patients. No particular association was found between the sagittal types and specific coronal deformities. Sagittal shape recognition in patients with AS will help restore the appropriate theoretical shape through surgery, which can eventually lead to better surgical outcomes Level of Evidence: 2