Reactive oxygen species generated by hyperglycaemia modify structure and function of lipids, proteins and other molecules taking part in chronic vascular changes in diabetes mellitus (DM). Low activity of scavenger enzymes has been observed in patients with DM. Protective role of scavenger enzymes may be deteriorated by oxidative stress. This study was undertaken to investigate the association between gene polymorphisms of selected antioxidant enzymes and vascular complications of DM.

Background: Increased glycemic variability (GV) may be associated with diabetes complications. Our study assessed the relationship between microvascular complications (MVCs) and GV calculated from continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data in type 1 diabetes patients. Subjects and Methods: Thirty-two patients with type 1 diabetes (16 with and 16 without MVC) participated in this cross-sectional study. Vibration perception threshold (VPT), microalbuminuria, and fundoscopy were used to detect MVC. CGM data were recorded for 2 weeks and analyzed using proprietary software. Total SD (SD _T ), coefficient of variation (CV), and mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) were compared. Results: Patients with any MVC had significantly higher GV, calculated from CGM, than patients without MVC (SD _T , 4.1±0.6 vs. 3.4±0.8 mmol/L [ P =0.010]; CV, 0.43±0.06 vs. 0.38±0.08 [ P =0.032]; MAGE, 6.9±1.2 vs. 5.9±1.2 mmol/L [ P =0.014]) but comparable glycated hemoglobin (HbA _1c ) (70±9 vs. 69±10 mmol/mol [8.6±0.8% vs. 8.5±0.9%], difference not significant). No significant difference in GV was found between the two groups when using only self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) data. A positive association was found between VPT and SD _T in all patients ( r =0.51, P =0.0026). Conclusions: Patients with type 1 diabetes and any MVC had significantly higher GV calculated from CGM, but not from SMBG, than patients with comparable glycemic control but without complications. This supports the hypothesis that increased GV might be associated with MVC in type 1 diabetes and that HbA _1c may not describe diabetes control completely.

The aim of this study was to compare insulin sensitivity expressed by the hyperinsulinemic clamp and by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) and QUICKI indexes in subjects with various disorders influencing insulin action. We examined 41 type 2 diabetic patients, 20 insulinoma patients, 32 women with polycystic ovary syndrome, 16 patients with primary hyperaldosteronism, 12 patients with essential high renin hypertension, and 47 healthy subjects. The metabolic clearance rate of glucose and the insulin sensitivity index calculated from the clamps were compared with both the HOMA and QUICKI indexes. The relationship of insulin action to body mass index, serum cholesterol, and triglycerides as well as to systolic and diastolic blood pressures was also evaluated. Body mass index was very strongly associated with the insulin sensitivity index (r = -0.70; P < 0.0001) in the entire cohort of 168 subjects. Cholesterol, triglycerides, and blood pressure influenced insulin action in the healthy subjects and type 2 diabetic patients. A significant relationship was observed between the insulin sensitivity index and the HOMA or QUICKI indexes in healthy subjects (r = -0.66; P < 0.0001), type 2 diabetic patients (r = -0.68; P < 0.0001), and women with polycystic ovary syndrome (r = -0.65; P < 0.0001). We did not find any relationship between the above variables in the patients with insulinoma or primary hyperaldosteronism. The HOMA and QUICKI indexes do not offer the same information as glucose clamps in the rare cases with differently impaired peripheral or hepatic insulin action.

Receptor for advanced glycation endproducts (RAGE) plays the essential role in the pathogenesis of diabetic vascular complications. The aim of the study was to compare concentration of soluble RAGE and its ligands (EN-RAGE and HMGB1) with different biochemical parameters in Type 1 (T1DM) and Type 2 (T2DM) diabetes mellitus.Total number of 154 persons (45 T1DM, 68 T2DM, 41 controls) was examined and concentrations of sRAGE, EN-RAGE and HMGB1 were measured and compared to diabetes control, albuminuria, cell adhesion molecules and metalloproteinases (MMPs).Mean serum sRAGE concentration was higher in T1DM as compared to controls (1137±532 ng/l vs. 824±309 ng/l, p<0.01). Similarly, EN-RAGE was significantly higher in both diabetic groups (p<0.001) and HMGB1 concentrations were elevated in T2DM patients (p<0.01). Significant relationship was found between MMP9 and HMGB1 and EN-RAGE in diabetic patients. Inverse relationship was observed between MMP2 and MMP9 in both types of diabetic patients (r= − 0.602, p<0.002 and r= − 0.771, p<0.001). Significant positive correlation was found between sRAGE and ICAM-1, VCAM-1 or vWF (p<0.01 to p<0.001).We conclude that serum sRAGE and RAGE ligands concentrations reflect endothelial dysfunction developing in diabetes.

Loss of pancreatic beta cells is a central feature of type 1 (T1D) and type 2 (T2D) diabetes, but a therapeutic strategy to preserve beta cell mass remains to be established. Here we show that the death receptor TMEM219 is expressed on pancreatic beta cells and that signaling through its ligand insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP3) leads to beta cell loss and dysfunction. Increased peripheral IGFBP3 was observed in established and at-risk T1D/T2D patients and was confirmed in T1D/T2D preclinical models, suggesting that dysfunctional IGFBP3/TMEM219 signaling is associated with abnormalities in beta cells homeostasis. In vitro and in vivo short-term IGFBP3/TMEM219 inhibition and TMEM219 genetic ablation preserved beta cells and prevented/delayed diabetes onset, while long-term IGFBP3/TMEM219 blockade allowed for beta cell expansion. Interestingly, in several patients’ cohorts restoration of appropriate IGFBP3 levels was associated with improved beta cell function. The IGFBP3/TMEM219 pathway is thus shown to be a physiological regulator of beta cell homeostasis and is also demonstrated to be disrupted in T1D/T2D. IGFBP3/TMEM219 targeting may therefore serve as a therapeutic option in diabetes.