Porous 3D Cu layers with the following average parameters: thickness ~35 µm, pore density ~4.0 × 106 cm−2, and pore sizes ~25 µm were electrodeposited from an acidic sulphate electrolyte, and the suitability of different electrochemically active surface area determination methods for characterising these electrodes was assessed. Structural characterisation of the samples was conducted using SEM and an optical profiler, while electrochemical measurements were performed using cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The evaluation of electrochemically active surface area involved the underpotential deposition of Tl and Pb monolayers as well as double-layer capacitance measurements. The results obtained indicate that both methods yield similar results for non-porous Cu electrodes. However, for Cu 3D nanostructures, the evaluation mode significantly influences the results. Double-layer capacitance measurements show significantly higher values for the electrochemically active surface area compared to the underpotential deposition (UPD) technique. The complex spatial structure of the Cu 3D layer hinders the formation of a continuous monolayer during the UPD process, which is the principal reason for the observed differences.
Although Cu 3D structures are widely used in electrocatalytic practice, this electrode has not been studied enough in relation to the electrochemical transformation of CO2 to C2 products. Cu foam samples were deposited from acidic solutions with varying concentrations of primary components (H2SO4, CuSO4, and Cl− ions) with the aim of determining the relationship between catalyst structure and activity/selectivity in producing C2 gaseous compounds during CO2 electrochemical reduction. The deposited samples were characterized using SEM and electrochemical techniques, including Pb underpotential deposition (UPD), to determine the contribution of crystal facets. The most efficient electrodes were found to be those deposited in a solution without Cl− additives. Their effectiveness was related to the shape and size of the crystallites forming the branches. These crystallites create a spatial structure that supports C-C coupling and C2 gaseous compound formation. The higher catalytic activity and selectivity of this electrode may also be related to its lower Cu(111) facet input to the overall facet distribution and its higher number of structural defects. Despite the higher electrochemically active surface area of samples deposited in the presence of Cl− ions, their lower activity is related to structural characteristics that cause possible mass transfer limitations.