Annegret Dahlmann-Noor

Dr. Annegret Dahlmann-Noor

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2013 in The American Journal of Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RFRichard H. Foxton
Richard H. Foxton
AFArthur Finkelstein
Arthur Finkelstein
SVSauparnika Vijay
Sauparnika Vijay
Annegret Dahlmann-NoorAnnegret Dahlmann-Noor
Annegret Dahlmann-Noor
PKPeng T. Khaw
Peng T. Khaw
YNYin Shan Ng
Yin Shan Ng
Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) is a validated therapeutic target in several angiogenic- and vascular permeability-related pathological conditions, including certain cancers and potentially blinding diseases, such as age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy. We and others have shown that VEGF-A also plays an important role in neuronal development and neuroprotection, including in the neural retina. Antagonism of VEGF-A function might therefore present a risk to neuronal survival as a significant adverse effect. Herein, we demonstrate that VEGF-A acts directly on retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) to promote survival. VEGF receptor-2 signaling via the phosphoinositide-3-kinase/Akt pathway was required for the survival response in isolated RGCs. These results were confirmed in animal models of staurosporine-induced RGC death and experimental hypertensive glaucoma. Importantly, we observed that VEGF-A blockade significantly exacerbated neuronal cell death in the hypertensive glaucoma model. Our findings highlight the need to better define the risks associated with use of VEGF-A antagonists in the ocular setting.

1 June 2019 in Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APAara Patel
Aara Patel
JHJane D. Hayward
Jane D. Hayward
Vijay Tailor-HamblinVijay Tailor-Hamblin
Vijay Tailor-Hamblin
RNRodney Nyanhete
Rodney Nyanhete
HAHelena Ahlfors
Helena Ahlfors
JSJane C Sowden
Jane C Sowden

1 December 2011 in Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MGMichaël J. A. Girard
Michaël J. A. Girard
Annegret Dahlmann-NoorAnnegret Dahlmann-Noor
Annegret Dahlmann-Noor
SRSauparnika Rayapureddi
Sauparnika Rayapureddi
JBJean Antoine Bechara
Jean Antoine Bechara
BBBenedicte M. E. Bertin
Benedicte M. E. Bertin
CEC. Ross Ethier
C. Ross Ethier
Purpose. Previous work has suggested a major role of scleral biomechanics in the pathogenesis of glaucoma. Since fiber orientation in connective tissues is a key determinant of tissue biomechanics, experimental characterization of scleral fiber orientation is needed to fully understand scleral biomechanics. This is a report of baseline experimental measurements of fiber orientation in whole normal rat scleras. Methods. Twenty ostensibly normal Norway brown rat eyes were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. The scleras were cleaned of intra- and extraorbital tissues and dissected into five patches, and each patch was glycerol treated to maximize its transparency. Fiber orientation was measured using small-angle light scattering (SALS). Scattering patterns were analyzed to extract two microstructural parameters at each measurement location—the preferred fiber orientation and the degree of alignment—yielding a fiber orientation map for each sclera. Results. Rat sclera is structurally anisotropic with several consistent features. At the limbus, fibers were highly aligned and organized primarily into a distinct ring surrounding the cornea. In the equatorial region, the fibers were primarily meridionally aligned. In the posterior and peripapillary region, the scleral fibers were mostly circumferential but less aligned than those in the anterior and equatorial regions. Conclusions. Circumferential scleral fibers may act as reinforcing rings to limit corneal and optic nerve head deformations, whereas equatorial meridional fibers may either provide resistance against extraocular muscle forces or limit globe axial elongation.

19 August 2016 in British Medical Bulletin
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Vijay Tailor-HamblinVijay Tailor-Hamblin
Vijay Tailor-Hamblin
MBManuela Bossi
Manuela Bossi
JGJohn A. Greenwood
John A. Greenwood
Annegret Dahlmann-NoorAnnegret Dahlmann-Noor
Annegret Dahlmann-Noor
With a prevalence of 2–5%, amblyopia is the most common vision deficit in children in the UK and the second most common cause of functional low vision in children in low-income countries. Pubmed, Cochrane library and clinical trial registries (clinicaltrials.gov, ISRCTN, UKCRN portfolio database). Screening and treatment at the age of 4–5 years are cost efficient and clinically effective. Optical treatment (glasses) alone can improve visual acuity, with residual amblyopia treated by part-time occlusion or pharmacological blurring of the better-seeing eye. Treatment after the end of the conventional ‘critical period’ can improve vision, but in strabismic amblyopia carries a low risk of double vision. It is not clear whether earlier vision screening would be cost efficient and associated with better outcomes. Optimization of treatment by individualized patching regimes or early start of occlusion, and novel binocular treatment approaches may enhance adherence to treatment, provide better outcomes and shorten treatment duration. Binocular treatments for amblyopia. Impact of amblyopia on education and quality of life; optimal screening timing and tests; optimal administration of conventional treatments; development of child-friendly, effective and safe binocular treatments.

1 June 2017 in Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBManuela Bossi
Manuela Bossi
Vijay Tailor-HamblinVijay Tailor-Hamblin
Vijay Tailor-Hamblin
EAElaine J. Anderson
Elaine J. Anderson
PBPeter J. Bex
Peter J. Bex
JGJohn A. Greenwood
John A. Greenwood
SDSteven C. Dakin
Steven C. Dakin
Purpose: Amblyopia is a common developmental visual impairment characterized by a substantial difference in acuity between the two eyes. Current monocular treatments, which promote use of the affected eye by occluding or blurring the fellow eye, improve acuity, but are hindered by poor compliance. Recently developed binocular treatments can produce rapid gains in visual function, thought to be as a result of reduced interocular suppression. We set out to develop an effective home-based binocular treatment system for amblyopia that would engage high levels of compliance but that would also allow us to assess the role of suppression in children's response to binocular treatment. Methods: Balanced binocular viewing therapy (BBV) involves daily viewing of dichoptic movies (with “visibility” matched across the two eyes) and gameplay (to monitor compliance and suppression). Twenty-two children (3–11 years) with anisometropic (n = 7; group 1) and strabismic or combined mechanism amblyopia (group 2; n = 6 and 9, respectively) completed the study. Groups 1 and 2 were treated for a maximum of 8 or 24 weeks, respectively. Results: The treatment elicited high levels of compliance (on average, 89.4% ± 24.2% of daily dose in 68.23% ± 12.2% of days on treatment) and led to a mean improvement in acuity of 0.27 logMAR (SD 0.22) for the amblyopic eye. Importantly, acuity gains were not correlated with a reduction in suppression. Conclusions: BBV is a binocular treatment for amblyopia that can be self-administered at home (with remote monitoring), producing rapid and substantial benefits that cannot be solely mediated by a reduction in interocular suppression.

1 July 2017 in Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Annegret Dahlmann-NoorAnnegret Dahlmann-Noor
Annegret Dahlmann-Noor
Vijay Tailor-HamblinVijay Tailor-Hamblin
Vijay Tailor-Hamblin
CBCatey Bunce
Catey Bunce
YAYassir Abou-Rayyah
Yassir Abou-Rayyah
GAGillian Adams
Gillian Adams
MPMaria Papadopoulos
Maria Papadopoulos