Background: Sepsis is a critical condition characterized by severe immune dysregulation, ranking among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in intensive care and internal medicine units. Nutritional status plays a pivotal role in modulating these responses, as when inadequate it can compromise immune defenses, the body’s ability to handle stress and inflammation, and the clinical course. Malnutrition is frequently observed in septic patients and is strongly associated with worse clinical outcomes, including increased mortality, prolonged hospital stays, and greater complication rates. In this context, nutritional scoring systems have emerged as valuable tools to evaluate patients’ nutritional status and predict clinical trajectories. Objectives: Given the absence of a direct comparison of their performance in an internal medicine setting, this study aimed to assess the effectiveness of various nutritional scores as predictive tools for clinical outcomes in septic patients, emphasizing their application within the field of internal medicine. Methods and Results: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 143 patients diagnosed with sepsis or septic shock who were admitted to an internal medicine unit. Key variables included clinical and laboratory parameters, comorbidities, and nutritional scores at the time of diagnosis. The modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score, the modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score, and the blood urea nitrogen-to-albumin ratio (BAR) were evaluated in forecasting mortality and clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis. Among them, the mNUTRIC score emerged as the strongest independent predictor of in-hospital mortality, with a good performance and a reasonable threshold for risk stratification. Conclusions: The study highlights the mNUTRIC score’s practicality and reliability in assessing nutritional and inflammatory risks in septic patients, particularly in non-ICU settings. These findings suggest its potential utility in guiding nutritional interventions and improving clinical outcomes, emphasizing the importance of integrating nutritional assessment into sepsis management.

Diabetes mellitus has been knowingly associated with increased risk of fractures, so much so that skeletal fragility is considered a complication of diabetes. Determinants of bone fragility in this chronic condition are several, and the diabetes treatment choice could influence bone metabolism. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have recently expanded the therapeutic armamentarium for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D); these antihyperglycemic drugs act by reducing renal glucose reabsorption in the proximal tubule and have a proven cardiorenal benefit. The role of SGLT2i towards phospho-calcium metabolism is still unclear, so we aimed to review the current evidence of the relationship between SGLT2i and calcium and phosphate homeostasis. The PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Knowledge databases were searched to identify original research articles, meta-analyses, and scientific reviews on effects on bone metabolism in T2D patients treated with SGLT2i. Emerging data indicate that SGLT2i may lead to a rise of bone turnover markers, promoting a lower skeletal bone density and an increased fracture risk on murine models, but in real-world studies, results are controversial. Therefore, more clinical trials are needed to further clarify this topic, and the effects of SGLT2i on calcium homeostasis remain to date poorly understood.