Radical cystectomy with lymph node dissection and urinary diversion is the gold-standard treatment for non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, in patients who refuse cystectomy, or in whom cystectomy carries a high risk, bladder-preserving therapies remain potential options. Bladder preservation therapies can include maximal debulking transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), concurrent chemoradiation therapy, followed by cystoscopy to assess response. At this time, maximal TURBT is recommended for patients prior to the initiation of chemoradiation therapy or in patients with residual bladder tumors after the completion of chemoradiation therapy. That being said, TURBT carries significant risks such as bladder perforation, bleeding, and infection, ultimately risking delayed systemic treatment. Hence, understanding its role within trimodal therapy is crucial to avoid undue suffering in patients. Herein, we review the current literature on the impact of debulking TURBT in non-metastatic MIBC.

Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors (PMTs) are rare tumors that can cause tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO) through overproduction of FGF23, a peptide hormone that causes renal phosphate wasting and reduced osteoblastic activity. The diagnosis of PMTs can be difficult to make as the presenting symptoms are non-specific. Although PMT is a rare entity, most cases are benign in nature, not requiring further intervention after surgery, as resection is typically curative. Here, we present a unique case of malignant PMT with de novo liver metastasis in a female patient who presented with TIO and underwent surgical resection of her primary lesion with subsequent regression of her liver metastasis. Moreover, we analyze a review of literature and discuss the importance of a timely diagnosis of this rare phenomenon. It is encouraged that providers strongly consider a diagnosis of PMT in patients with otherwise unexplained bone pain, fatigue, weakness, especially if accompanied with hypophosphatemia. Further studies are also warranted to identify prognostic factors that predict a PMT’s malignant potential as they may help identify possible therapeutic targets.

Intro: Hematopoietic stem-cell transplant (HSCT) recipients are considered to be at high risk for poor outcomes following COVID-19 infection given their co-morbidities and immunosuppression. Sharma et al published the CIBMTR observational report data that showed that recipients of allogeneic HSCT who contract COVID-19 have poor overall survival with a 30-day mortality of 32%. That being said, there have been relatively few studies that look into the effect of COVID-19 on HSCT recipients in the setting of in vivo T cell depletion protocols. With the increased use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) based GVHD prophylaxis regimens for our match related and match unrelated HSCT recipients since 2018 at our institution, we are interested to see if our COVID-19 outcomes differ from those published in the CIBMTR report. Methods: This is a single institution retrospective analysis evaluating outcomes of HSCT recipients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 between March 2020 and April 2021. Patients 18 years or older who underwent HSCT and subsequently contracted COVID-19 were included in the data collection. Demographic data including age, type of hematologic malignancy, conditioning regimen, GVHD prophylaxis, date of COVID-19 infection, with pre- and post-COVID-19 infection labs were obtained. Our primary endpoint in this retrospective analysis was non-relapse mortality within 30 days of COVID-19 diagnosis. Results: There were 21 patients at our institution who had undergone HSCT and subsequently contracted COVID-19. The most common primary disease types were acute lymphoblastic leukemia (33.3%), acute myeloid leukemia (23.8%), and myelodysplastic syndrome (19.0%). The median age of our patient population was 53 years (range, 24-66). 6 of the patients received match related allografts. 7 received cells from match unrelated donors. 7 received cells from haploidentical donors. 1 patient had received an autologous stem cell transplant. Of the remaining 20 allo-HSCT recipients, 14 of them (70.0%) received myeloablative conditioning regimens, whereas 6 (30.0%) received reduced intensity or non-myeloablative regimens. Our GVHD prophylaxis regimens were PTCy/Tacro/MMF (12 pts, 60.0%) and Tacro/MTX (8 pts, 40.0%). Patient demographics and outcomes are found on Tables 1 and 2. Our patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 a median 469 days post-transplant, with 8 patients (38.1%) diagnosed with COVID-19 within 1 year of transplant. 11 of the patients (52.4%) received steroids following their diagnosis with COVID-19. Of the 20 allo-HSCT recipients with confirmed COVID-19 infection, 1 passed away 20 days after the diagnosis was made. This gives us a 5.0% case fatality rate attributable to COVID-19 in our population in our allo-HSCT population. 16 of the 20 patients were symptomatic at the time of diagnosis (80.0%). 7 of the 20 patients (35.0%) were hospitalized for a median of 7 days (range, 5-17 days), with 2 requiring ICU level of care. The one patient who passed away tested positive for COVID-19 177 days post-transplant and was hospitalized approximately 7 days after diagnosis, where he was intubated on hospital day 4 and ultimately passed away on hospital day 13. The patient had received Tacro/MTX for GVHD prophylaxis. Discussion: Although this is a small sample size, our data suggests that our allo-HSCT recipients who contracted COVID-19 have had generally good short-term outcomes. Our study is limited by the small number of patients who got infected with COVID-19, particularly those within 1-year post-transplant. Furthermore, we acknowledge it is difficult to claim that the PTCy based GVHD prophylaxis regimens for our HSCT recipients were solely responsible for their improved outcomes since 40% of allo-HSCT recipients did not get PTCy for GVHD prophylaxis. However, we believe it would be valuable to evaluate in a prospective analysis. We are currently evaluating if a COVID-19 diagnosis has any effect on long term transplant related complications and outcomes in this population. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures: Chaudhary: Angeles Therapeutics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Founder, Patents & Royalties: Cell therapy ; Celldex: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Moderna: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Pancella: Consultancy; Oncotartis: Consultancy; Athelas: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; TCR2: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Allogene: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Yaghmour: Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Purpose of review: Recent advances in direct rat sarcoma (RAS) inhibition and downstream pathway targeting have created novel therapeutic strategies which can be utilized in gynecologic oncology. This review examines RAS biology, lessons learned from other malignancies, and emerging strategies for gynecological malignancies. Recent findings: KRAS G12C inhibitors in lung cancer established the clinical feasibility of direct RAS targeting, while colorectal cancer studies demonstrated the importance of lineage-specific combinations. KRAS G12D inhibitors, targeted protein degraders, and multiselective RAS(ON) inhibitors represent the next frontier in RAS inhibition, expanding therapeutic options across both gynecologic and nongynecologic tumors. In recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer, therapeutic advances have centered on inhibiting the downstream RAS-mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK)–extracellular signal-regulated kinase signaling pathway using MEK or combined RAF/MEK and focal adhesion kinase inhibitors, rather than direct RAS inhibition, demonstrating encouraging clinical responses, leading to accelerated approval for KRAS -mutant disease. Summary: RAS-pathway directed therapy requires consideration of tumor lineage, specific alleles, and functional pathway dependence. Although clinical progress in gynecologic oncology is most relevant in low-grade serous ovarian cancer, emerging non-G12C therapies warrant further evaluation across gynecologic malignancies. Novel combinations and integrated biomarkers will be necessary to improve patient selection and overcome therapeutic resistance.