Joe Cresko

Mr. Joe Cresko

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 June 2023 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSenthil Kumar Sundaramoorthy
Senthil Kumar Sundaramoorthy
Dipti KamathDipti Kamath
Dipti Kamath
SNSachin Nimbalkar
Sachin Nimbalkar
CPChristopher Price
Christopher Price
TWThomas Wenning
Thomas Wenning
JCJoe Cresko
Joe Cresko
The U.S. government aims to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 to reduce the severe impacts of climate change. The U.S. industrial sector will become a focal point for decarbonization since it accounts for 33% of the nation’s primary energy use and 30% of its energy-related CO2 emissions. Industrial emissions are also expected to increase by 15% through 2050, making the industrial sector a logical target for decarbonization efforts. Energy efficiency technology pathways provide low-cost, foundational routes to decarbonization that can be implemented immediately. Energy efficiency technology pathways, such as strategic energy management, system efficiency, smart manufacturing, material efficiency, and combined heat and power, are well established and would immediately reduce energy use and emissions. However, their role in the aggressive net-zero decarbonization pathway for the industrial sector is still unclear. This study aims to address energy efficiency pathways for decarbonization, and reviews studies related to these technologies for industrial decarbonization through 2050. This study identifies different strategies for the industrial sector in general and that are specific to six energy-intensive industries: iron and steel; chemical; food and beverage; petroleum refining; pulp and paper; and cement. Finally, a path toward the successful implementation of energy efficiency technologies is outlined.

21 October 2024 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IOIkenna J. Okeke
Ikenna J. Okeke
Dipti KamathDipti Kamath
Dipti Kamath
SNSachin U. Nimbalkar
Sachin U. Nimbalkar
JCJoe Cresko
Joe Cresko
Low-carbon fuels, feedstocks, and energy sources can play a vital role in the decarbonization of clinker production in cement manufacturing. Fuel switching with renewable natural gas, green hydrogen, and biomass can provide a low-carbon energy source for the high-temperature process heat during the pyroprocessing steps of clinker production. However, up to 60% of CO2 emissions from clinker production are attributable to process-related CO2 emissions, which will need the simultaneous implementation of other decarbonization technologies, such as carbon capture. To evaluate the potential of fuel switching and carbon capture technologies in decarbonizing the cement industry, a study of the facility-level CO2 emissions is necessary. This study evaluates the potential for using a single low-carbon fuel as an energy source in clinker production for cement manufacturing compared to conventional clinker production (which uses a range of fuel mixes). In addition, conventional carbon capture (operated with natural gas-based steam for solvent regeneration) and electrified carbon capture configurations were designed and assessed for net-zero emission targets. Carbon emissions reductions with and without biogenic emissions credits were analyzed to ascertain their impact on the overall carbon accounting. Results show that carbon emissions intensity of cement can vary from 571 to 784 kgCO2eq/metric ton of cement without carbon capture and from 166.33 to 438.66 kgCO2eq/metric ton of cement with carbon capture. We find that when biogenic carbon credits are considered, cement production with a sustainably grown biomass as fuel source coupled with conventional carbon capture can lead to a net-negative emission cement (−271 kgCO2eq/metric ton of cement), outperforming an electrified capture design (35 kgCO2eq/metric ton of cement). The carbon accounting for the Scope 1, 2, and biogenic emissions conducted in this study is aimed at helping researchers and industry partners in the cement and concrete sector make an informed decision on the choice of fuel and decarbonization strategy to adopt.

20 June 2020 in Journal of Advanced Manufacturing and Processing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SNSachin Nimbalkar
Sachin Nimbalkar
SSSarang D. Supekar
Sarang D. Supekar
WMWill Meadows
Will Meadows
TWThomas Wenning
Thomas Wenning
WGWei Guo
Wei Guo
JCJoe Cresko
Joe Cresko
This article uses case studies to demonstrate the potential of smart manufacturing (SM) and Internet of Things (IoT) technologies to enhance operational performance and productivity in industry. The analysis highlights benefits such as cost reduction, production flexibility, shorter product time‐to‐market, energy/water efficiency and environmental impact reduction, and increased productivity. To illustrate the effectiveness of SM and IoT approaches, the authors sought out manufacturers currently implementing or seeking to implement SM and IoT technologies. The authors identified beer brewing (NAICS Code 312120) as a rapidly expanding industry whose members appear eager to implement SM technologies to optimize production lines by revealing bottlenecks and identifying performance‐reducing nodes. This article presents two case studies based on SM and IoT technologies in breweries. It briefly describes a systematic framework introduced elsewhere by the authors and uses it to assess the energy productivity and competitiveness of SM applications in breweries. This article addresses questions concerning the information and communications technology infrastructure needed to build smart breweries and how corporations simplify the installation and deployment of SM and IoT components. This article was originally published in the Proceedings of the 2019 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Industry.

5 August 2025 in Energy Conversion and Management: X
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RSRamon P.P. da Silva
Ramon P.P. da Silva
IOIkenna J. Okeke
Ikenna J. Okeke
KTKiran Thirumaran
Kiran Thirumaran
MMManish Mosalpuri
Manish Mosalpuri
FSForooza Samadi
Forooza Samadi
JCJoe Cresko
Joe Cresko

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CPChristopher Price
Christopher Price
KAKristina Armstrong
Kristina Armstrong
Dipti KamathDipti Kamath
Dipti Kamath
SNSachin Nimbalkar
Sachin Nimbalkar
JCJoe Cresko
Joe Cresko
Decarbonizing industrial manufacturing is a significant challenge in the effort to limit the impacts of global climate change. Additive manufacturing (AM) is one pathway for reducing the impacts of manufacturing as it creates parts layer-by-layer rather than by removing (i.e., subtracting) material from solid stock as with conventional techniques. This reduces material inputs and generates less waste, which can substantially lower life cycle energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. However, AM adoption in the manufacturing sector has been slow, partly due to challenges in making a strong business case compared with more traditional and widely available techniques. This paper highlights the need for the development of simple screening analysis tools to speed the adoption of AM in the manufacturing sector by providing decision-makers easy access to important production life cycle emissions, and cost information. Details on the development of two Microsoft Excel software tools are provided: upgrades to an existing tool on the energy and carbon impacts of AM and a new tool for analyzing the major cost components of AM. A case study applies these two tools to the production of a lightweight aerospace bracket, showing how the tools can be used to estimate the environmental benefits and production costs of AM.

14 September 2026 in Energy Conversion and Management: X
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RSRamon Peruchi Pacheco da Silva
Ramon Peruchi Pacheco da Silva
IOIkenna J Okeke
Ikenna J Okeke
KTKiran Thirumaran
Kiran Thirumaran
SNSachin U Nimbalkar
Sachin U Nimbalkar
JCJoe Cresko
Joe Cresko