Adrian Price-Whelan

Dr. Adrian Price-Whelan

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 August 2018 in The Astronomical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TCThe Astropy Collaboration
The Astropy Collaboration
APAdrian Price-Whelan
Adrian Price-Whelan
BSB. M. Sipőcz
B. M. Sipőcz
HGH. M. Günther
H. M. Günther
PLP. L. Lim
P. L. Lim
(C(Astropy Contributors)
(Astropy Contributors)
The Astropy Project supports and fosters the development of open-source and openly developed Python packages that provide commonly needed functionality to the astronomical community. A key element of the Astropy Project is the core package astropy, which serves as the foundation for more specialized projects and packages. In this article, we provide an overview of the organization of the Astropy project and summarize key features in the core package, as of the recent major release, version 2.0. We then describe the project infrastructure designed to facilitate and support development for a broader ecosystem of interoperable packages. We conclude with a future outlook of planned new features and directions for the broader Astropy Project.

1 August 2022 in The Astrophysical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
APAdrian Price-Whelan
Adrian Price-Whelan
PLPey Lian Lim
Pey Lian Lim
NENicholas Earl
Nicholas Earl
NSNathaniel Starkman
Nathaniel Starkman
LBLarry Bradley
Larry Bradley
AZAndrea Zonca
Andrea Zonca
The Astropy Project supports and fosters the development of open-source and openly developed Python packages that provide commonly needed functionality to the astronomical community. A key element of the Astropy Project is the core package astropy, which serves as the foundation for more specialized projects and packages. In this article, we summarize key features in the core package as of the recent major release, version 5.0, and provide major updates on the Project. We then discuss supporting a broader ecosystem of interoperable packages, including connections with several astronomical observatories and missions. We also revisit the future outlook of the Astropy Project and the current status of Learn Astropy. We conclude by raising and discussing the current and future challenges facing the Project.

18 June 2018 in The Astronomical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APAdrian Price-Whelan
Adrian Price-Whelan
DHDavid W. Hogg
David W. Hogg
HRHans-Walter Rix
Hans-Walter Rix
NLNathan De Lee
Nathan De Lee
SMSteven R. Majewski
Steven R. Majewski
OZOlga Zamora
Olga Zamora
Multi-epoch radial velocity measurements of stars can be used to identify stellar, substellar, and planetary-mass companions. Even a small number of observation epochs can be informative about companions, though there can be multiple qualitatively different orbital solutions that fit the data. We have custom-built a Monte Carlo sampler (The Joker) that delivers reliable (and often highly multimodal) posterior samplings for companion orbital parameters given sparse radial velocity data. Here we use The Joker to perform a search for companions to 96,231 red giant stars observed in the APOGEE survey (DR14) with ≥3 spectroscopic epochs. We select stars with probable companions by making a cut on our posterior belief about the amplitude of the variation in stellar radial velocity induced by the orbit. We provide (1) a catalog of 320 companions for which the stellar companion’s properties can be confidently determined, (2) a catalog of 4898 stars that likely have companions, but would require more observations to uniquely determine the orbital properties, and (3) posterior samplings for the full orbital parameters for all stars in the parent sample. We show the characteristics of systems with confidently determined companion properties and highlight interesting systems with candidate compact object companions.

25 June 2020 in The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RARomina Ahumada
Romina Ahumada
CPCarlos Allende Prieto
Carlos Allende Prieto
AAAndrés Almeida
Andrés Almeida
FAFriedrich Anders
Friedrich Anders
SAScott F. Anderson
Scott F. Anderson
KMKaren L. Masters
Karen L. Masters
This paper documents the 16th data release (DR16) from the Sloan Digital Sky Surveys (SDSS), the fourth and penultimate from the fourth phase (SDSS-IV). This is the first release of data from the Southern Hemisphere survey of the Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment 2 (APOGEE-2); new data from APOGEE-2 North are also included. DR16 is also notable as the final data release for the main cosmological program of the Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (eBOSS), and all raw and reduced spectra from that project are released here. DR16 also includes all the data from the Time Domain Spectroscopic Survey and new data from the SPectroscopic IDentification of ERosita Survey programs, both of which were co-observed on eBOSS plates. DR16 has no new data from the Mapping Nearby Galaxies at Apache Point Observatory (MaNGA) survey (or the MaNGA Stellar Library “MaStar”). We also preview future SDSS-V operations (due to start in 2020), and summarize plans for the final SDSS-IV data release (DR17).

8 October 2017 in Journal of Open Source Software
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
APAdrian Price-Whelan
Adrian Price-Whelan

13 November 2019 in Astronomy & Astrophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HKHelmer H. Koppelman
Helmer H. Koppelman
AHAmina Helmi
Amina Helmi
DMDavide Massari
Davide Massari
APAdrian Price-Whelan
Adrian Price-Whelan
TSTjitske K. Starkenburg
Tjitske K. Starkenburg
Aims. Several kinematic and chemical substructures have been recently found amongst Milky Way halo stars with retrograde motions. It is currently unclear how these various structures are related to each other. This Letter aims to shed light on this issue. Methods. We explore the retrograde halo with an augmented version of the Gaia DR2 RVS sample, extended with data from three large spectroscopic surveys, namely RAVE, APOGEE, and LAMOST. In this dataset, we identify several structures using the HDBSCAN clustering algorithm. We discuss their properties and possible links using all the available chemical and dynamical information. Results. In concordance with previous work, we find that stars with [Fe/H] < −1 have more retrograde motions than those with [Fe/H] > −1. The retrograde halo contains a mixture of debris from objects like Gaia-Enceladus, Sequoia, and even the chemically defined thick disc. We find that the Sequoia has a smaller range in orbital energies than previously suggested and is confined to high energy. Sequoia could be a small galaxy in itself, but since it overlaps both in integrals-of-motion space and chemical abundance space with the less bound debris of Gaia-Enceladus, its nature cannot yet be fully settled. In the low-energy part of the halo, we find evidence for at least one more distinct structure: Thamnos. Stars in Thamnos are on low-inclination, mildly eccentric retrograde orbits, moving at vϕ ≈ −150 km s−1, and are chemically distinct from the other structures. Conclusions. Even with the excellent Gaia DR2 data, piecing together all the fragments found in the retrograde halo remains challenging. At this point, we are very much in need of large datasets with high-quality high-resolution spectra and tailored high-resolution hydrodynamical simulations of galaxy mergers.