Effective conservation of coastal marine mammals is largely dependent on reliable knowledge of their abundance, as well as the ecological and human factors driving their distribution. In developing countries, lack of resources and capacity frequently impedes research needed to estimate abundance and to determine the ecological requirements of coastal marine mammals and the impact of threats related to coastal development and fisheries. Over the course of five years, we developed practical research methods and trained local scientists in Thailand to use accepted line transect distance sampling methods for abundance assessment. The study focused on a little-known coastal and freshwater species found throughout Southeast Asia, namely the Irrawaddy dolphin, which has been sighted regularly along the coast of the eastern Gulf of Thailand. During five years of line transect boat surveys in Trat Province, the eastern-most province in Thailand, we found an average of 423 dolphins distributed within 12km of the coast. Compared to other abundance estimates of coastal Irrawaddy dolphins in Southeast Asia, this is a relatively large number. This population could extend into the northern coast of Cambodia, where surveys are currently being planned. The Thai government has begun talks with Cambodia about a transboundary marine protected area that would include areas in both countries where coastal Irrawaddy dolphins are found. Other analyses include photo-identification, modeling environmental factors that determine presence, determination of fresh vs. salt water foraging using stable isotopes, and an assessment of threats. Collaboration between scientists in Thailand, Cambodia and Vietnam is further needed to determine dolphin movement and habitat use across borders.
According to the Thailand’s National Strategy (2017-2036) and National Reform Plans, various tools, techniques, or methods are necessary to collect and investigate data for the effective preservation and protection of the country’s natural resources. We aimed to apply various tools and methods for integrated coastal management in Thailand. This study used the InVEST models, including the habitat quality (HQ) and habitat risk assessment (HRA) models, to evaluate the natural habitat quality and cumulative human activity risk in the Sriracha district and Sichang Islands, Thailand. The HQ model revealed the presence of abundant ecological services and high quality natural habitats. We observed habitat degradation in the mooring zone, city area, forests, and coral reefs, with moderate risk to distinct habitats. Our findings identified two potential scenarios. Conservation scenarios exhibited a lower HRA ratio compared to current and development scenarios. Overall, the results showed the effectiveness of the InVEST model in evaluating habitat risk under both present and simulated conditions. Our study highlights the importance of informed management plans and policy-making processes to achieve planned coastal management goals.
The degradation of marine and coastal resources, caused mainly by human activities, underscores the urgent need for conservation. In waters around the Sichang Islands, the Bryde’s whale is listed as an endangered marine species. The extensive human activities in this area have raised serious concerns about the possible negative influence on this species. To conserve the species effectively and efficiently, we need to understand where it distributes and how human activities influence its distribution. For this purpose, we use spatial modeling techniques alongside diverse databases encompassing various spatial and ecological factors to analyze the distribution of, and human activities’ impact on, the Bryde’s whale (Balaenoptera edeni) in the Sichang Islands, Thailand. We also use the MaxEnt model to predict habitat suitability and the result reveals key factors influencing whale occurrence across seasons. During the dry season, TSS (32.8%), chlorophyll-a (20.1%), and DO (15.9%) levels play significant roles, while DO (29.9%), NH3 (29.4%), and distance to shore (13.3%) are crucial in the wet season. Furthermore, the Species Risk Assessment (SRA) model indicates the mooring area (14.95%) is the high-risk area for the Bryde’s Whale, particularly during the wet season. In contrast, moderate risks are observed during the dry season, notably in fishing zones (99.68%) and mooring areas (99.28%). The study also highlights that the factors mentioned above influence prey availability and habitat suitability for the Bryde’s whale and identifies potential threats posed by human activities, such as fishing and other maritime operations, that are likely to decrease water quality and prey abundance. These results are useful information for identifying sensitive areas and measures for risk mitigation, thus supporting the development of MSP or MPA plans.