High-dose dual therapy (HDDT) using proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) and amoxicillin attracted attention for its simplicity and lower adverse event profile. Besides, vonoprazan is not available worldwide. This real-world study aims to compare the efficacy of esomeprazole-based and rabeprazole-based HDDT regimens and to identify clinical factors influencing outcomes. A retrospective study enrolled 346 Helicobacter pylori-infected naïve patients from January 2016 to August 2023. Patients were assigned to either a 14-day esomeprazole-based HDDT (EA-14; esomeprazole 40 mg t.i.d. and amoxicillin 750 mg q.i.d. for 14 days, n = 173) or a 14-day rabeprazole-based HDDT (RA-14; rabeprazole 20 mg and amoxicillin 750 mg q.i.d. for 14 days, n = 173). Five patients from the EA-14 group and 10 from the RA-14 group were lost to follow-up, resulting in 168 and 163 patients for the per-protocol (PP) analysis, respectively. Eradication rates for the EA-14 and RA-14 groups were 90.2% and 80.9% (P = 0.014) in intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis; and 92.9% and 85.9% (P = 0.039) in PP analysis. Adverse event rates were similar between the two groups (11.9% vs 11.7%, P = 0.944). In multiple logistic regression analysis, age≧60 was associated with eradication failure (P = 0.046) and a trend of significance for smoking (P = 0.060) in the EA-14 group but not in the RA-14 group. A trend of significance was also observed for eradication regimens (EA-14 vs RA-14) (P = 0.071). The antibiotic resistance rates were amoxicillin (2.3%), clarithromycin (14.7%), metronidazole (40.3%), and dual resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole (7.0%). Esomeprazole-based HDDT achieved over 90% eradication rates but rabeprazole-based HDDT, which failed.
Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) affects a significant proportion of individuals, with life stress being a contributing factor. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between psychosomatic evaluations, heart rate variability (HRV), and GERD in a cohort of individuals. Additionally, the study aimed to analyze the sequencing changes following proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment and identify predictive factors associated with refractory GERD. Methods: A prospective cohort of 105 individuals with reflux esophagitis and a control group of 50 participants without acid reflux symptoms were enrolled. Psychosomatic evaluations, including GERDQ, GERDQLQ, RSI, BAI, BDI, and SSS-8, were assessed at baseline and during treatment. HRV parameters were also evaluated. Multivariate analysis was used to identify predictive factors for refractory GERD. PPIs were administered regularly for the initial 2 months and then used on-demand. Refractory GERD was defined as less than 50% improvement in symptom relief or GERDQLQ score ≥ 20 after 8 weeks of PPI treatment. Results: The GERD group had higher scores in all psychosomatic evaluations compared to the control group (all p-values < 0.001). There were no significant changes in any parameters of HRV before and after treatment in the GERD group. Strong and consistent correlations were observed between GERD symptoms and psychological scores (BAI, BDI, and SSS-8) across all time points (W0, W4, and W8). Sequential reductions in GERD symptom scores and psychosomatic evaluations were observed during the initial eight weeks of treatment. Higher GERDQ (≥10) and SSS-8 (≥12) scores were predictive of refractory GERD (p = 0.004 and p = 0.009, respectively). Conclusions: This study emphasizes the importance of considering physiological and psychological factors in the management of GERD. Psychosomatic evaluations provide valuable insights for assessing and treating GERD patients. Integrating stress management and comprehensive assessments into personalized treatment strategies is crucial.
Background/Objectives: Metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) has emerged as a major global etiology of chronic liver disease. However, the prognostic impact of MASLD in patients with non-B, non-C HCC (NBNC-HCC) following curative resection remains poorly defined. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of histologic SLD and MASLD-related components in this growing patient population. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with NBNC-HCC receiving curative-intent hepatectomy between 2014 and 2023, excluding those with viral hepatitis or significant alcohol use. MASLD was defined as hepatic steatosis (≥5%) combined with at least one cardiometabolic risk factor (obesity, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, or hypertension). Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify independent prognostic factors. Results: 169 (61.7%) patients fulfilled MASLD criteria. The MASLD group showed significantly better RFS (p = 0.039) and OS (p = 0.016). Notably, after multivariate adjustment, histologic SLD remained independently associated with reduced mortality (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32–0.93; p = 0.027), while MASLD status was attenuated. Subgroup analysis revealed that this survival benefit was most pronounced in non-cirrhotic patients (p = 0.027 for OS). Patients with MASLD also exhibited lower liver-related mortality (p = 0.028). Conclusions: Steatotic liver disease was independently associated with improved survival in NBNC-HCC patients undergoing curative hepatectomy, particularly in non-cirrhotic individuals. Given the increasing prevalence of MASLD, incorporating hepatic steatosis, metabolic components, and fibrosis status into risk stratification may help improve postoperative management in this distinct subgroup.
The antibiotics resistances to amoxicilln, tetracycline was low in Taiwan even after multiple H. pylori treatment failures and high dose metronidazole could overcome antibiotics resistance. In real world practice, susceptibility-guided treatments are not widely available. Therefore, we assessed the efficacy of 14-day modified quadruple therapy containing amoxicillin, tetracycline and high dose metronidazole and PPI as an empirical third-line rescue H. pylori treatment. This study was conducted by analyzing 70 consecutive prospectively registered patients who failed two times H. pylori eradication. All of them received endoscopy for H. pylori culture. Seven patients were lost to follow up. They were then treated according to the antibiotic susceptibility testing reports (Cultured group, n=39). Those who failed H. pylori culture were prescribed with a modified 14-day quadruple therapy containing esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily, amoxicillin 1 g twice daily, tetracycline 500 mg four times daily and metronidazole 500 mg three times daily (empirical group, n=24). Follow-up urea breath test was performed 8 weeks later. The eradication rates attained by Cultured group and empirical group were 89.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 72.72%-97.11%) and 58.3% (95% CI=36.61%-77.86%), in the per protocol analysis (p=0.004); 81.4%(95% CI=66.60%-91.61%) and 51.8% (95% CI=31.9%-71.29%), in the intention-to-treat analysis (p=0.014). Culture-guided therapy was the clinical factors influencing the efficacy of H. pylori eradication (OR: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.04-0.60, p=0.006). In conclusion, empirical 14-day modified 3 quadruple therapy is not acceptable as an alternative third-line rescue H. pylori treatment arobably but the success rate of the third-line susceptibility-guided treatment was only moderate (<90%).