Telehealth has been adopted as an alternative to in-person primary care visits. With multiple participants able to join remotely, telehealth can facilitate the discussion and documentation of advance care planning (ACP) for those with Alzheimer’s disease-related disorders (ADRDs). We measured hospitalization-associated utilization outcomes, instances of hospitalization and 90-day re-hospitalizations from payors’ administrative databases and verified the data via electronic health records. We estimated the hospitalization-associated costs using the Nevada State Inpatient Dataset and compared the estimated costs between ADRD patients with and without ACP documentation in the year 2021. Compared to the ADRD patients without ACP documentation, those with ACP documentation were less likely to be hospitalized (mean: 0.74; standard deviation: 0.31; p < 0.01) and were less likely to be readmitted within 90 days of discharge (mean: 0.16; standard deviation: 0.06; p < 0.01). The hospitalization-associated cost estimate for ADRD patients with ACP documentation (mean: USD 149,722; standard deviation: USD 80,850) was less than that of the patients without ACP documentation (mean: USD 200,148; standard deviation: USD 82,061; p < 0.01). Further geriatrics workforce training is called for to enhance ACP competencies for ADRD patients, especially in areas with provider shortages where telehealth plays a comparatively more important role.

To people living with Alzheimer’s Disease-Related Disorders (ADRD), timely and coordinated communication is essential between their informal caregivers and healthcare providers. In provider shortage areas, for example, the state of Nevada, telehealth can be an effective primary care delivery alternative to in-person visits. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of telehealth visits for people living with ADRD in the state of Nevada, a decision-analytic Markov model was developed from healthcare system perspectives with a 10-year horizon/1-year cycle. To estimate the effects of demographic and geographic parameters on the Markov model, race parameters were divided into non-Hispanic White individuals vs. others and location parameters were divided into urban vs. rural. A 12-item short-version Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI-12) was applied to measure the informal caregiver burdens of non-institutionalized people living with ADRD. The values of mortality rate and healthcare utilization were obtained from healthcare systems’ publicly available payor administrative data and Nevada State Inpatient/Emergency Department datasets. Among urban-residing non-Hispanic White individuals, the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) per modified ZBI-12 indicated a cost saving of USD 9.44 with telehealth visits; among urban-residing racial minorities, the ICER per modified ZBI-12 indicated a cost saving of USD 29.26 with in-person visits; and among rural residents, the ICER per modified ZBI-12 indicated a cost-saving of USD 320.93 with telehealth visits. Distributional differences in the cost-saving effects of telehealth primary care were noted in line with racial and geographic parameters. Workforce and caregiver training is necessary for reducing distributional differences, especially among urban-residing racial monitories living with ADRD in the provider shortage area of the state of Nevada.