Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (ω-3 PUFAs), including alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) and its derivatives eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), are “essential” fatty acids mainly obtained from diet sources comprising plant oils, marine blue fish, and commercially available fish oil supplements. Many epidemiological and retrospective studies suggested that ω-3 PUFA consumption decreases the risk of cardiovascular disease, but results of early intervention trials have not consistently confirmed this effect. In recent years, some large-scale randomized controlled trials have shed new light on the potential role of ω-3 PUFAs, particularly high-dose EPA-only formulations, in cardiovascular prevention, making them an attractive tool for the treatment of “residual” cardiovascular risk. ω-3 PUFAs' beneficial effects on cardiovascular outcomes go far beyond the reduction in triglyceride levels and are thought to be mediated by their broadly documented “pleiotropic” actions, most of which are directed to vascular protection. A considerable number of clinical studies and meta-analyses suggest the beneficial effects of ω-3 PUFAs in the regulation of blood pressure in hypertensive and normotensive subjects. These effects occur mostly through regulation of the vascular tone that could be mediated by both endothelium-dependent and independent mechanisms. In this narrative review, we summarize the results of both experimental and clinical studies that evaluated the effect of ω-3 PUFAs on blood pressure, highlighting the mechanisms of their action on the vascular system and their possible impact on hypertension, hypertension-related vascular damage, and, ultimately, cardiovascular outcomes.

Elevated plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a relatively common and highly heritable trait conferring individuals time-dependent risk of developing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD). Following its first description, Lp(a) triggered enormous scientific interest in the late 1980s, subsequently dampened in the mid-1990s by controversial findings of some prospective studies. It was only in the last decade that a large body of evidence has provided strong arguments for a causal and independent association between elevated Lp(a) levels and CVD, causing renewed interest in this lipoprotein as an emerging risk factor with a likely contribution to cardiovascular residual risk. Accordingly, the 2022 consensus statement of the European Atherosclerosis Society has suggested inclusion of Lp(a) measurement in global risk estimation. The development of highly effective Lp(a)-lowering drugs (e.g., antisense oligonucleotides and small interfering RNA, both blocking LPA gene expression) which are still under assessment in phase 3 trials, will provide a unique opportunity to reduce “residual cardiovascular risk” in high-risk populations, including patients with arterial hypertension. The current evidence in support of a specific role of Lp(a) in hypertension is somehow controversial and this narrative review aims to overview the general mechanisms relating Lp(a) to blood pressure regulation and hypertension-related cardiovascular and renal damage.

As of 2024, arterial hypertension is still considered the leading modifiable cardiovascular risk factor and, due to high rates of undertreatment and poor blood pressure control, the major contributor to human morbidity and mortality. Development of new treatment options and better interventions in lifestyle correction have become a priority of experimental and clinical research. In the last decades, dietary supplementation of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (ω-3 PUFAs) and generation of gut microbiota-derived short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) have surged as potential and promising interventions for hypertension and cardiovascular prevention. ω-3 PUFAs are considered "essential" fatty acids that can be obtained only from dietary sources. Although previous intervention trials were not consistent in reporting a significant benefit of ω-3 PUFAs, the recent REDUCE-IT trial has provided robust evidence in support of their role in cardiovascular prevention. Recent studies have also identified the intestinal microbiota as a potential player in the pathophysiology and progression of hypertension. Although this might occur through many pathways, generation of SCFAs that is highly dependent on dietary fiber intake is primarily involved, providing an additional target for the development of novel therapeutic strategies. For these reasons, some scientific societies currently recommend dietary supplementation of ω-3 PUFAs and fiber-containing foods in patients with hypertension. In this narrative review, we summarize the results of studies that examined the effects of ω-3 PUFAs and SCFAs on blood pressure, highlighting the mechanisms of action on the vascular system and their possible impact on hypertension, hypertension-related organ damage and, ultimately, cardiovascular outcomes.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for more than half of the cases of HF worldwide. Among the different phenotypes, cardiometabolic HFpEF has the highest prevalence. Cumulative insults related to cardiometabolic comorbidities—obesity, hypertension and type 2 diabetes—create a milieu of metabolic derangements, low-grade systemic inflammation (i.e., metainflammation), endothelial dysfunction, and coronary microvascular disease. Emerging data indicate that the gut–heart axis is a potential amplifier of this process. Cardiometabolic comorbidities promote gut dysbiosis, loss of short-chain fatty acid (SCFA)-producing taxa, and disruption of the intestinal barrier, leading to endotoxemia and upregulation of pro-inflammatory pathways such as TLR4- and NLRP3-mediated signaling. Concomitantly, beneficial gut-derived metabolites (acetate, propionate, butyrate) decrease, while detrimental metabolites increase (e.g., TMAO), potentially fostering myocardial fibrosis, diastolic dysfunction, and adverse remodeling. SCFAs—acetate, propionate, and butyrate—may exert pleiotropic actions that directly target HFpEF pathophysiology: they may provide a CPT1-independent energy substrate to the failing myocardium, may improve lipid and glucose homeostasis via G protein-coupled receptors and AMPK activation, and may contribute to lower blood pressure and sympathetic tone, reinforce gut barrier integrity, and act as anti-inflammatory and epigenetic modulators through the inhibition of NF-κB, NLRP3, and histone deacetylases. This review summarizes current evidence linking gut microbiota dysfunction to cardiometabolic HFpEF, elucidates the mechanistic role of SCFAs, and discusses nutritional approaches aimed at enhancing their production and activity. Targeting gut–heart axis and SCFAs pathways may represent a biologically plausible and low-risk approach that could help attenuate inflammation and metabolic dysfunctions in patients with cardiometabolic HFpEF, offering novel potential therapeutic targets for their management.