In patients undergoing immunotherapy, the quality of the immune response is reduced, which may negatively affect the efficacy of vaccination. This study was conducted in order to evaluate the efficacy of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine in patients using immunomodulators. Seronegative patients for HBV who were using biological agents, were included in the study. The vaccination was administered on the standard schedule in 3 doses of 20 or 40 µg/ml. Eighty-two patients (52%) were males and the mean age of all patients was 44,8 ± 10,3 years. Among these 109 patients, 83 had psoriasis, 12 had Crohn’s disease, six had rheumatoid arthritis, three had ulcerative colitis, three had hydradenitis supurativa, one had Behcet’s disease and one had ankylosing spondylitis. The biological agents that were being used by these patients were adalimumab (62), ustekinumab (25), infliximab (12), etanercept (9) and golimumab (1). Seventy-three of the patients were vaccinated with a dose of 20 µg/ml and 36 with 40 µg/ml. The anti-HBs titers of fifty-eight (53.2%) patients were above 10 mIU/ml. The antibody response rate was lowest in infliximab-users (16.7%) (p = 0.007), which was followed by adalimumab (48.4%), and higher protection rates were achieved in patients using ustekinumab and etanercept (72% and 88.9%, respectively; p < 0.05). The HBV vaccine response rate in patients using immunomodulators was significantly lower than that in immunocompetent patients. Furthermore, high dose vaccination did not increase the response rate. Clinicians should take into account administering HBV vaccination before treatment with biological agent in patients who have negative HBV serology.

Aim of this study is to evaluate the epidemiological, clinical characteristics and the parameters that determine the clinical course and prognosis of the COVID-19 patients admitted to the Ankara City Hospital during the first month of the pandemic In Turkey. SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive patients who were hospitalized between March 10 and April 10, 2020 were included. Among 222 patients, mean age was higher in SARI/critical disease group (p < 0,001). Median time from illness onset to admission, presence of co-morbidity, especially coronary artery disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, was significantly higher in severe acute respiratory illness (SARI)/critical disease group (p < 0.05). Cough and fever were the most common symptoms, while anosmia and loss of taste were observed in 8.6 % and 7.7 % patients, respectively. Mortality rate was 5.4 %. High neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, low lymphocyte, monocyte and platelet count, elevated liver enzymes, low GFR, high levels of muscle enzymes, ferritin and IL-6 on admission were found to be associated with SARI/critical disease (p<0.05). Bilateral ground-glass opacity and patchy infiltration were more frequently seen in SARI/critical disease group (p < 0.001). Patients older than 65 years have 8-fold increased risk for development of SARI/critical disease. This cohort study regarding COVID-19 cases in Turkey reveals that older age, presence of co-morbidity, bilateral infiltration on CT, high neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, low monocyte and platelet count, elevated liver enzymes, low GFR, high levels of muscle enzymes, and high levels of ferritin and IL-6 on admission are predictors of SARI and severe disease.

Background/Aims: Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors and ustekunimab are widely used in autoimmune diseases. It is known that these biological agents cause the reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV). There is no standardized strategy to prevent the reactivation in patients with evidence of a previous HBV infection. In our study, anti-HBc IgG-positive patients who received a biological agent were evaluated in terms of HBV reactivation. Materials and Methods: Patients who were followed up for the use of biological agents in our clinic were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with isolated anti-HBc IgG positivity were included in the study. The HBV reactivation data were recorded from the patients’ files retrospectively. Results: Two hundred and seventy-eight patients who received biological treatment were evaluated. Twenty-nine patients with isolated anti-HBc IgG positivity or resolved HBV infection were included in the study. The HBV reactivation was seen in 5 patients (17.2%). Of these patients, 3 were using adalimumab, 1 infliximab, and 1 ustekunimab. It was controlled by antiviral therapy that was started in the early period. Conclusion: Drugs that block TNF-α and ustekunimab cause an increase in viral replication. In literature, the HBV reactivation rate was approximately 1% in HBsAg-negative, anti-HBC IgG-positive cases, whereas it was found to be as high as 17.2% in our study. Patients receiving the immunomodulator therapy should be evaluated for HBV serology before treatment and carefully monitored for HBV reactivation during and after treatment. Cite this article as: Solay AH, Acar A, Eser F, et al. Reactivation rates in patients using biological agents, with resolved HBV infection or isolated anti-HBc IgG positivity. Turk J Gastroenterol 2018; 29: 561-5.

In this study, we aimed to compare the intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate of hospitalized mild/moderate COVID-19 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), favipiravir, and HCQ plus favipiravir. Single center retrospective designed observational study conducted in Ankara City Hospital. Patients who were hospitalized between March 15, 2020 and June 1, 2020 in COVID-19 inpatient clinics with laboratory confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 were included in the study. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) for multiple treatment groups approach was used to balance the differences in several variables on admission. Among 2441 patients hospitalized with diagnosis of COVID-19 during the study period, 824 were eligible for the analysis. Median age of patients was 42 (18−93 years). Among all, 347 (43.2%) of the patients had mild disease, 470 (56.8%) had pneumonia. Propensity scores ranged from 0.1841 to 0.9381 in the HCQ group, from 0.03643 to 0.29885 in the favipiravir group, and from 0.03542 to 0.56184 in the HCQ plus favipiravir group. After IPTW for multiple treatment groups was applied, all the covariates in the planned propensity score had weighted standardized effect sizes below 10% which were ranged from 0.005 to 0.092. Multivariate analysis of treatment effect (adjusted effect of treatment) was indicated that there is no statistically significant difference between HCQ, favipiravir, and HCQ plus favipiravir treatment. After using combination of SMOTE and Bootstrap resampling approach, we found no statistically significant difference between HCQ and HCQ plus favipiravir groups in terms of ICU admission. However, compared with the HCQ group, ICU admission rate was statistically significantly higher in the favipiravir group. We obtained the similar results after the sensitivity analysis. HCQ with or without favipiravir treatment is associated with reduced risk of ICU admission compared to favipiravir alone in mild to moderate COVID-19 adult patients.

This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors of patients colonized with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). The study was conducted between January 2010 and March 2016. The colonized group consisted of patients who had a CRE strain in their rectal swab cultures, whereas patients with negative rectal surveillance cultures for CRE who were concurrently hospitalized in the same units with the colonized group patients were included in the control group. The number of patients in the colonized and the control group was 71 and 120, respectively. Both groups were evaluated for demographic and healthcare-associated characteristics. Isolated microorganisms in rectal surveillance cultures for CRE were Klebsiella pneumoniae (75.5%), Escherichia coli (15.5%), Enterobacter cloacae (4.2%), Klebsiella oxytoca (1.4%), and Klebsiella terrigena (1.4%). The isolates were resistant to imipenem, meropenem, and ertapenem (52.1%, 73.2%, and 100%, respectively). In multivariate analysis, presence of decubitus, colistin usage, glycopeptide usage, and fluoroquinolone usage were found to be independent risk factors for CRE colonization. There was no significant difference between the two groups with regards to mortality (P = 0.070). These results are in agreement with the current literature. The findings of this study could be useful for improvement of infection control strategies related to CRE