Wendy Dahl

Dr. Wendy Dahl

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 August 2012 in British Journal of Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WDWendy Dahl
Wendy Dahl
LFLauren M. Foster
Lauren M. Foster
RTRobert T. Tyler
Robert T. Tyler
Pulses, including peas, have long been important components of the human diet due to their content of starch, protein and other nutrients. More recently, the health benefits other than nutrition associated with pulse consumption have attracted much interest. The focus of the present review paper is the demonstrated and potential health benefits associated with the consumption of peas,Pisum sativumL., specifically green and yellow cotyledon dry peas, also known as smooth peas or field peas. These health benefits derive mainly from the concentration and properties of starch, protein, fibre, vitamins, minerals and phytochemicals in peas. Fibre from the seed coat and the cell walls of the cotyledon contributes to gastrointestinal function and health, and reduces the digestibility of starch in peas. The intermediate amylose content of pea starch also contributes to its lower glycaemic index and reduced starch digestibility. Pea protein, when hydrolysed, may yield peptides with bioactivities, including angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitor activity and antioxidant activity. The vitamin and mineral contents of peas may play important roles in the prevention of deficiency-related diseases, specifically those related to deficiencies of Se or folate. Peas contain a variety of phytochemicals once thought of only as antinutritive factors. These include polyphenolics, in coloured seed coat types in particular, which may have antioxidant and anticarcinogenic activity, saponins which may exhibit hypocholesterolaemic and anticarcinogenic activity, and galactose oligosaccharides which may exert beneficial prebiotic effects in the large intestine.

1 January 2020
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
WDWendy Dahl
Wendy Dahl
DMDaniela Rivero Mendoza
Daniela Rivero Mendoza
JLJason M Lambert
Jason M Lambert

1 May 2015 in Journal of Renal Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YSYounis A. Salmean
Younis A. Salmean
MSMark S. Segal
Mark S. Segal
SPSergiu P. Palii
Sergiu P. Palii
WDWendy Dahl
Wendy Dahl

12 June 2017 in Frontiers in Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GMGuillermo E. Marcial
Guillermo E. Marcial
AFAmanda L. Ford
Amanda L. Ford
MHMichael J. Haller
Michael J. Haller
SGSalvador A. Gezan
Salvador A. Gezan
NHNatalie A. Harrison
Natalie A. Harrison
GLGraciela L. Lorca
Graciela L. Lorca
Lactobacillus johnsonii N6.2 mitigates the onset of type 1 diabetes (T1D) in Biobreeding diabetes-prone rats, in part, through changes in kynurenine:tryptophan (K:T) ratios. The goal of this pilot study was to determine the safety, tolerance and general immunological response of L. johnsonii N6.2 in healthy subjects. A double-blind, randomized clinical trial in 42 healthy individuals with no known risk factors for T1D was undertaken to evaluate subject responses to the consumption of L. johnsonii N6.2. Participants received 1 capsule/day containing 108 colony forming units of L. johnsonii N6.2 or placebo for 8 weeks. Comprehensive metabolic profile (CMP), leukocyte subpopulations by complete blood count (CBC) and flow cytometry, serum cytokines and relevant metabolites in the indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) pathway were assessed. L. johnsonii N6.2 survival and intestinal microbiota was analyzed. Daily and weekly questionnaires were assessed for potential effects of probiotic treatment on general wellness. The administration of L. johnsonii N6.2 did not modify the CMP or CBC of participants suggesting general safety. In fact, L. johnsonii N6.2 administration significantly decreased the occurrence of abdominal pain, indigestion and cephalic syndromes. As predicted, increased serum tryptophan levels increased resulting in a decreased K:T ratio was observed in the L. johnsonii N6.2 group. Interestingly, immunophenotyping assays revealed that monocytes and natural killer (NK) cell numbers were increased significantly after wash-out (12 weeks). Moreover, an increase of circulating effector Th1 cells (CD45RO+CD183+CD196-) and cytotoxic CD8+ T cells subset was observed in the L. johnsonii N6.2 group. Consumption of L. johnsonii N6.2 is well tolerated in adult control subjects, demonstrates systemic impacts on innate and adaptive immune populations and results in a decreased K:T ratio. These data provide support for the safety and feasibility of using L. johnsonii N6.2 in prevention trials in subjects at risk for T1D. Trial registration: This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02349360.

1 April 2020 in Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AFAmanda L. Ford
Amanda L. Ford
VNVaruni Nagulesapillai
Varuni Nagulesapillai
APAmanda Piano
Amanda Piano
JAJérémie Auger
Jérémie Auger
SGStephanie-Anne Girard
Stephanie-Anne Girard
WDWendy Dahl
Wendy Dahl
Higher protein intakes may help reduce sarcopenia and facilitate recovery from illness and injury in older adults. However, high-protein diets (HPDs) including animal-sourced foods may negatively perturb the microbiota, and provision of probiotics and prebiotics may mitigate these effects. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of HPD, with and without a probiotic and/or prebiotic, on gut microbiota and wellness in older women. We conducted an 18-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Participants were healthy, older women (mean age±standard deviation=73.7±5.6 years; n=26) recruited from Florida. Participants received a weight-maintenance HPD for 2-week periods and the following, in random order: HPD alone (1.5 to 2.2 g/kg/day protein); HPD plus multistrain probiotic formulation (1.54×109Bifidobacterium bifidum HA-132, 4.62×109Bifidobacterium breve HA-129, 4.62×109Bifidobacterium longum HA-135, 4.62×109Lactobacillus acidophilus HA-122, and 4.62×109Lactobacillus plantarum HA-119), HPD plus prebiotic (5.6 g inulin), and HPD plus synbiotic (probiotic plus inulin), separated by 2-week washouts. Stools were collected per period for quantitative polymerase chain reaction (strain recovery) and 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon sequencing analyses (microbiota profile). Measures of gastrointestinal and general wellness were assessed. Microbiota composition and probiotic strain recovery were measured. Microbiota composition was analyzed by Wilcoxon signed-rank test and t test. Secondary outcomes were analyzing using generalized linear mixed models. The microbiota profile demonstrated relative stability with the HPD; representation of Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, and Streptococcus were enhanced, whereas butyrate producers, Roseburia and Anaerostipes, were suppressed. Lactococcus was suppressed with synbiotic vs other HPD periods. Recovery was confirmed for all probiotic strains. Indicators of wellness were unchanged, with the exception of a minimal increase in gastrointestinal distress with inulin. Fat-free mass increased from baseline to study end. An HPD adhering to the recommended acceptable macronutrient distribution ranges maintains wellness in healthy older women and exerts minor perturbations to the microbiome profile, a group that may benefit from a higher protein intake. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT #02445560.

1 January 2016 in Nutrition Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAlyssa M. Burns
Alyssa M. Burns
MZMichelle A. Zitt
Michelle A. Zitt
CRCassie C. Rowe
Cassie C. Rowe
BLBobbi Langkamp-Henken
Bobbi Langkamp-Henken
VMVolker Mai
Volker Mai
WDWendy Dahl
Wendy Dahl