Sami Alasfar

Dr. Sami Alasfar

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sami AlasfarSami Alasfar
Sami Alasfar
LKLavanya Kodali
Lavanya Kodali
CSCarrie A. Schinstock
Carrie A. Schinstock
Despite significant advancements in immunosuppressive therapies, kidney transplant rejection continues to pose a substantial challenge, impacting the long-term survival of grafts. This article provides an overview of the diagnosis, current therapies, and management strategies for acute T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). TCMR is diagnosed through histological examination of kidney biopsy samples, which reveal the infiltration of mononuclear cells into the allograft tissue. Corticosteroids serve as the primary treatment for TCMR, while severe or steroid-resistant cases may require T-cell-depleting agents, like Thymoglobulin. ABMR occurs due to the binding of antibodies to graft endothelial cells. The most common treatment for ABMR is plasmapheresis, although its efficacy is still a subject of debate. Other current therapies, such as intravenous immunoglobulins, anti-CD20 antibodies, complement inhibitors, and proteasome inhibitors, are also utilized to varying degrees, but their efficacy remains questionable. Management decisions for ABMR depend on the timing of the rejection episode and the presence of chronic changes. In managing both TCMR and ABMR, it is crucial to optimize immunosuppression and address adherence. However, further research is needed to explore newer therapeutics and evaluate their efficacy.

11 January 2016 in BMC Nephrology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sami AlasfarSami Alasfar
Sami Alasfar
NCNaima Carter-Monroe
Naima Carter-Monroe
ARAvi Z. Rosenberg
Avi Z. Rosenberg
RMRobert A. Montgomery
Robert A. Montgomery
Nada AlachkarNada Alachkar
Nada Alachkar
Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) is an uncommon glomerular disorder that may lead to end stage renal disease (ESRD). With new understanding of the disease pathogenesis, the classical classification as MPGN types I, II, III has changed. Data on post-transplant MPGN, in particular with the newly refined classification, is limited. We present our center’s experience of MPGN after kidney transplantation using the new classification. This is a retrospective study of 34 patients with ESRD due to MPGN who received 40 kidney transplants between 1994 and 2014. We reviewed the available biopsies’ data using the new classification. We assessed post transplantation recurrence rate, risk factors of recurrence, the response to therapy and allografts’ survival. Median time of follow up was 5.3 years (range 0.5–14 years). Using the new classification, we found that pre-transplant MPGN disease was due to immune complex-mediated glomerulonephritis (ICGN) in 89 % of cases and complement-mediated glomerulonephritis (CGN) in 11 %. Recurrence was detected in 18 transplants (45 %). Living related allografts (P = 0.045), preemptive transplantations (P = 0.018), low complement level (P = 0.006), and the presence of monoclonal gammopathy (P = 0.010) were associated with higher recurrence rate in ICGN cases. Half of the patients with recurrence lost their allografts. The use of ACEi/ARB was associated with a trend toward less allograft loss. MPGN recurs at a high rate after kidney transplantation. The risk of MPGN recurrence increases with preemptive transplantation, living related donation, low complement level, and the presence of monoclonal gammopathy. Recurrence of MPGN leads to allograft failure in half of the cases.

21 November 2016 in BMC Nephrology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HAHouda Alachkar
Houda Alachkar
MMMartin Mutonga
Martin Mutonga
TKTaigo Kato
Taigo Kato
SKSowjanya Kalluri
Sowjanya Kalluri
YKYoichi Kakuta
Yoichi Kakuta
Nada AlachkarNada Alachkar
Nada Alachkar
T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) remains a major cause of kidney allograft failure. The characterization of T-cell repertoire in different immunological disorders has emerged recently as a novel tool with significant implications. We herein sought to characterize T-cell repertoire using next generation sequencing to diagnose TCMR. In this prospective study, we analyzed samples from 50 kidney transplant recipients. We collected blood and kidney transplant biopsy samples at sequential time points before and post transplant. We used next generation sequencing to characterize T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire by using illumina miSeq on cDNA synthesized from RNA extracted from six patients’ samples. We also measured RNA expression levels of FOXP3, CD8, CD4, granzyme and perforin in blood samples from all 50 patients. Seven patients developed TCMR during the first three months of the study. Out of six patients who had complete sets of blood and biopsy samples two had TCMR. We found an expansion of the TCR repertoire in blood at time of rejection when compared to that at pre-transplant or one-month post transplant. Patients with TCMR (n = 7) had significantly higher RNA expression levels of FOXP3, Perforin, Granzyme, CD4 and CD8 in blood samples than those with no TCMR (n = 43) (P = 0.02, P = 0.003, P = 0.002, P = 0.017, and P = 0.01, respectively). Our study provides a potential utilization of TCR clone kinetics analysis in the diagnosis of TCMR. This approach may allow for the identification of the expanded T-cell clones associated with the rejection and lead to potential noninvasive diagnosis and targeted therapies of TCMR.

12 December 2021 in American Journal of Transplantation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CLCaroline Liu
Caroline Liu
Sami AlasfarSami Alasfar
Sami Alasfar
PRPeter P. Reese
Peter P. Reese
SMSumit Mohan
Sumit Mohan
MDMona D. Doshi
Mona D. Doshi
CPChirag R. Parikh
Chirag R. Parikh
Kidney allocation trends from deceased donors with acute kidney injury (AKI) have not been characterized since initial kidney donor profile index (KDPI) reporting in 2012 and its use under the revised kidney allocation system (KAS) in 2014. We conducted a retrospective analysis of U.S. registry data to characterize kidney procurement and discard trends in deceased donors with AKI, defined by ≥50% or ≥0.3 mg/dL (≥4.0 mg/dL or ≥200% for stage 3) increase in terminal serum creatinine from admission. From 2010 to 2020, 172,410 kidneys were procured from 93,341 deceased donors 16 years or older. 34,984 kidneys were discarded (17,559 from AKI donors). The proportion of stage 3 AKI donors doubled from 6% (412/6841) in 2010 to 12% (1365/11493) in 2020. Procurement of stage 3 AKI kidneys increased from 51% (423/824) to 80% (2183/2730). While discard of stage 3 AKI kidneys increased from 41% (175/423) in 2010 to 44% (960/2183) in 2020, this increase was not statistically significant in interrupted time-series analysis following KAS implementation (slope difference -0.41 (-3.22, 2.4), and level change 3.09 (-6.4, 12.6)). In conclusion, the absolute number of stage 3 AKI kidneys transplanted has increased. Ongoing high discard rates of these kidneys suggest opportunities for improved utilization.

1 March 2020 in Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAnshul Bhalla
Anshul Bhalla
NANada Alachkar
Nada Alachkar
Sami AlasfarSami Alasfar
Sami Alasfar

17 December 2018 in BMC Nephrology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Nada AlachkarNada Alachkar
Nada Alachkar
JLJing Li
Jing Li
DMDany Matar
Dany Matar
VVVikas Vujjini
Vikas Vujjini
Sami AlasfarSami Alasfar
Sami Alasfar
CWChangli Wei
Changli Wei
Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is an important therapy for recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (rFSGS) post kidney transplant. suPAR has been causally implicated in rFSGS, and shown to be a unique biomarker for the occurrence and progression of chronic kidney disease. This study was targeted to evaluate the application of monitoring suPAR in TPE treated rFSGS. A retrospective (n = 19) and a prospective (n = 15) cohort of post transplant FSGS patients treated with TPE and rituximab were enrolled. We measured serum suPAR levels before and after the combined therapies, and assessed the role of suPAR changes on proteinuria reduction and podocyte β3- integrin activity. Treatment with TPE and rituximab resulted in significant decrease in proteinuria and suPAR levels. Among the variables including baseline suPAR, serum creatinine, proteinuria, eGFR, age at diagnosis, age at transplantation, transplantation numbers, time to recurrence, and TPE course numbers, only the reduction in suPAR levels and baseline proteinuria significantly correlated with the changes in proteinuria after treatment, with the former performed better in predicting proteinuria alteration. Additionally, the mean podocyte β3 integrin activity significantly decreased after TPE and rituximab treatment (1.10 ± 0.08) as compared to before treatment (1.34 ± 0.08), p < 0.05. Only the reduction in suPAR predicted the response to therapies with an odds ratio of 1.43, 95% CI (1.02, 2.00), p < 0.05. Serum suPAR levels reduced significantly after TPE and rituximab treatment in post transplant FSGS patients. The reduction in suPAR levels may be utilized to assess the changes in proteinuria and monitor the response to the therapies. Larger, multi-centered prospective studies monitoring serum suPAR levels in TPE managed post transplant FSGS are warranted.