Maria Magdalena Koteles

Dr. Maria Magdalena Koteles

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 December 2023 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AVAlon Vigdorovits
Alon Vigdorovits
MKMaria Magdalena Koteles
Maria Magdalena Koteles
Gheorghe-Emilian OlteanuGheorghe-Emilian Olteanu
Gheorghe-Emilian Olteanu
Laurean Ovidiu PopLaurean Ovidiu Pop
Laurean Ovidiu Pop
The application of artificial intelligence to improve the access of cancer patients to high-quality medical care is one of the goals of modern medicine. Pathology constitutes the foundation of modern oncologic treatment, and its role has expanded far beyond diagnosis into predicting treatment response and overall survival. However, the funding of pathology is often an afterthought in resource-scarce medical systems. The increased digitalization of pathology has paved the way towards the potential use of artificial intelligence tools for improving pathologist efficiency and extracting more information from tissues. In this review, we provide an overview of the main research directions intersecting with artificial intelligence and pathology in relation to oncology, such as tumor classification, the prediction of molecular alterations, and biomarker quantification. We then discuss examples of tools that have matured into clinical products and gained regulatory approval for clinical use. Finally, we highlight the main hurdles that stand in the way of the digitalization of pathology and the application of artificial intelligence in pathology while also discussing possible solutions.

10 July 2023 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMaria Magdalena Koteles
Maria Magdalena Koteles
AVAlon Vigdorovits
Alon Vigdorovits
DKDarshan Kumar
Darshan Kumar
IMIoana Maria Mihai
Ioana Maria Mihai
AJAura Jurescu
Aura Jurescu
Gheorghe-Emilian OlteanuGheorghe-Emilian Olteanu
Gheorghe-Emilian Olteanu
Breast cancer is the most prevalent neoplasia among women, with early and accurate diagnosis critical for effective treatment. In clinical practice, however, the subjective nature of histological grading of infiltrating ductal adenocarcinoma of the breast (DAC-NOS) often leads to inconsistencies among pathologists, posing a significant challenge to achieving optimal patient outcomes. Our study aimed to address this reproducibility problem by leveraging artificial intelligence (AI). We trained a deep-learning model using a convolutional neural network-based algorithm (CNN-bA) on 100 whole slide images (WSIs) of DAC-NOS from the Cancer Genome Atlas Breast Invasive Carcinoma (TCGA-BRCA) dataset. Our model demonstrated high precision, sensitivity, and F1 score across different grading components in about 17.5 h with 19,000 iterations. However, the agreement between the model’s grading and that of general pathologists varied, showing the highest agreement for the mitotic count score. These findings suggest that AI has the potential to enhance the accuracy and reproducibility of breast cancer grading, warranting further refinement and validation of this approach.

30 May 2025 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMaria Magdalena Koteles
Maria Magdalena Koteles
OTOvidiu Tica
Ovidiu Tica
Gheorghe-Emilian OlteanuGheorghe-Emilian Olteanu
Gheorghe-Emilian Olteanu
Background: Pathology is essential for cancer diagnosis, bridging clinical and surgical fields, and requires adequate infrastructure, technology, and skilled staff to meet standards of care. In Romania, healthcare underfunding limits pathology laboratories’ capacity to provide timely and accurate diagnoses, leading to delays that could negatively impact treatment and patient outcomes. Our study aimed to assess the status of publicly funded pathology laboratories in Romania and identify key areas for improvement. Methods: We analyzed public hospitals in Romania, excluding specialized and non-general care institutions, to evaluate pathology laboratories. A 10-item survey was distributed over 12 months via email, phone, administrative offices, and professional networks to pathologists working in these laboratories, regardless of their hierarchical position. A total of 154 pathology services were represented. The questionnaire assessed technical capabilities, diagnostic techniques, automation, staffing, infrastructure, and satisfaction with funding and resources. Responses were gathered with both predefined and open-text fields to capture comprehensive insights. Results: The findings revealed that many pathology laboratories faced significant challenges, including a lack of automation, limited integration of modern technologies, and barriers to digitalization. Despite these issues, pathologists reported higher-than-expected levels of satisfaction with their laboratories. Conclusions: A comprehensive understanding of existing practices is necessary to drive the modernization of pathology services, establish national standards, and improve collaboration both within and across specialties. Without such foundational insight, efforts to enhance the integration and effectiveness of pathology services are likely to remain constrained.