Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) is a rare and potentially serious bleeding condition in the fetus/newborn. FNAIT is usually considered as the platelet counterpart of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. In FNAIT, maternal alloantibodies against paternally inherited platelet antigens traverse the placenta and cause thrombocytopenia in the fetus/newborn. The most common and most serious cases of FNAIT among white people are caused by alloantibodies against the human platelet antigen 1a (HPA-1a), which is absent in 2.3% of women. Today, there is no screening for FNAIT, and for this reason, FNAIT is not suspected until an otherwise healthy child, born at term, presents with thrombocytopenia. Clinical management of subsequent pregnancies at risk of FNAIT is mostly based on the obstetric history. During the last 5 decades, hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn caused by antibodies against RhD has successfully been prevented by administration of hyperimmune anti-D IgG drug products to RhD-negative women after delivery of an RhD-positive child. Similarly, a hyperimmune anti-HPA-1a IgG (NAITgam) is under development for the prevention of HPA-1a immunization and FNAIT. If NAITgam becomes licensed for FNAIT prophylaxis and national health authorities decide to include FNAIT screening in their antenatal health care programs, it will be necessary to improve today's tools for assessing the risk of FNAIT. Although the primary risk factor for HPA-1a immunization is platelet type HPA-1bb, not all HPA-1a-negative women develop anti-HPA-1a. The women who are HLA-DRB3:01:01 negative (72%) only rarely develop anti-HPA-1a, and for those few who become HPA-1a immunized, it is quite rare to have a child with severe thrombocytopenia. Determination of fetal HPA-1 type is important because 15% of HPA-1a-negative women will carry an HPA-1a-negative fetus and therefore not be at risk of FNAIT. The severity of FNAIT seems to be associated with the level of anti-HPA-1a. Hence, in Norway, for example, an Ab threshold of 3 IU/mL is used to distinguish between low- and high-risk pregnancies. The current review will discuss to what extent these analyses, as well as determination of subtypes of anti-HPA-1a (anti-β3, anti-αIIbβ3, and anti-αvβ3) and Fc core fucosylation of anti-HPA-1a IgG, can be used as risk stratification tools.

The most common, severe cases of fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia among whites are caused by antibodies against human platelet antigen 1a (HPA-1a). The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis are to determine the association between maternal HLA-DRB3*01:01 and: (1) HPA-1a-alloimmunization and (2) neonatal outcome in children born of HPA-1a-immunized women. A systematic literature search identified 4 prospective and 8 retrospective studies. Data were combined across studies to estimate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and the associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The population represented by the prospective studies was more than 150 000. In the prospective studies, there were 64 severely thrombocytopenic newborns (platelet count <50 × 109/L) of whom 3 had intracranial hemorrhage. The mothers of all 64 children were HLA-DRB3*01:01+. The number of severely thrombocytopenic children born of HPA-1a-alloimmunized women in the retrospective studies was 214; 205 of whom were born of HLA-DRB3*01:01+ women. For HLA-DRB3*01:01− women, the OR (95% CI) for alloimmunization was 0.05 (0.00-0.60), and for severe neonatal thrombocytopenia 0.08 (0.02-0.37). This meta-analysis demonstrates that the risk of alloimmunization and of having a child with severe thrombocytopenia are both very low for HPA-1a− women who are HLA-DRB3*01:01−.

Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN), as well as fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT), represent two important disease entities that are caused by maternal IgG antibodies directed against nonmaternally inherited antigens on the fetal blood cells. These antibodies are most frequently directed against the RhD antigen on red blood cells (RBCs) or the human platelet antigen 1a (HPA-1a) on platelets. For optimal management of pregnancies where HDFN or FNAIT is suspected, it is essential to determine the RhD or the HPA-1a type of the fetus. Noninvasive fetal RhD typing is also relevant for identifying which RhD-negative pregnant women should receive antenatal RhD prophylaxis. In this review, we will give an overview of the clinical indications and technical challenges related to the noninvasive analysis of fetal RBCs or platelet types. In addition, we will discuss the ethical implications associated with the routine administration of antenatal RhD to all pregnant RhD-negative women and likewise the ethical challenges related to making clinical decisions concerning the mother that have been based on samples collected from the (presumptive) father, which is a common practice when determining the risk of FNAIT.

Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) is a rare condition in which maternal alloantibodies to fetal platelets cause fetal thrombocytopenia that may lead to intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Off-label intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has for 30 years been the standard of care for pregnant women who previously have had a child with FNAIT. The efficacy of this treatment has never been tested in a placebo-controlled clinical trial. Although IVIg treatment may improve the neonatal outcome in women who previously have had a child with FNAIT-associated ICH, the question is whether IVIg is necessary for all immunized pregnant women at risk of having a child with FNAIT. The results from some recent publications suggest that antenatal IVIg treatment is not necessary for women who are (1) HPA-1a-immunized and HLA-DRB3*01:01-negative, (2) HPA-1a-immunized with a previous child with FNAIT but without ICH or (3) HPA-5b-immunized. If IVIg is not used for these categories of pregnant women, the amount of IVIg used in pregnant women with platelet antibodies would be reduced to less than ¼ of today’s use. This is important because IVIg is a scarce resource, and the collection of plasma for the treatment of one pregnant woman is not only extremely expensive but also requires tremendous donor efforts.