Background and Objectives: Tension pneumothorax is a life-threatening emergency condition that requires immediate diagnosis and intervention. However, due to the non-specific symptoms and the rarity of its occurrence during surgery, anesthesiologists encounter difficulties in promptly diagnosing tension pneumothorax when it arises intraoperatively. Diagnosing tension pneumothorax can become even more challenging in unexpected situations in patients with normal preoperative evaluation for general anesthesia. Materials and Methods, Results: We report the case of a 66-year-old woman who underwent general anesthesia for oblique lateral interbody fusion surgery of her lumbar spine. Though she did not have any respiratory symptoms prior to the induction of anesthesia, auscultation following endotracheal intubation indicated decreased breathing sound in the left hemithorax of the chest. Subsequently, her vital signs showed tachycardia, hypotension, and hypoxemia, and the ventilator indicated a gradual increase in the airway pressure. We verified the proper depth of the endotracheal tube to exclude one-lung ventilation, and, in the meantime, learned that there had been unsuccessful attempts at left subclavian venous catheterization by the surgical department on the previous day. Tension pneumothorax was diagnosed through portable chest radiography in the operating room, and needle thoracostomy and chest tube insertion were performed immediately, which in turn stabilized her vital signs and airway pressure. The surgery was uneventful, and the chest tube was removed one week later after evaluation by the cardiothoracic department. The patient was discharged from hospital on postoperative day 14 without known complications. Conclusions: Anesthesiologists should be aware of the conditions and risk factors that may cause tension pneumothorax and remain vigilant for signs of its development throughout surgery, even for patients who show normal preoperative assessments. An undetected small pneumothorax without any symptoms can progress to tension pneumothorax through positive pressure ventilation during general anesthesia, posing a life-threatening situation. If a tension pneumothorax is highly suspected through clinical assessments, its prompt differentiation and timely diagnosis are crucial, allowing for rapid intervention to stabilize vital signs.

Background: Some studies have demonstrated that chemotherapy drugs enhance sensitivity to anesthetics owing to its systemic toxicity, while others have demonstrated that chemotherapy drugs have no effect. This study aimed to determine whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy influences the effect-site concentration (Ce) of propofol for sedation in patients with breast cancer. Methods: This study included patients aged 19–75 years who were scheduled to undergo breast cancer surgery under general anesthesia. Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were assigned to group C, whereas those who never received chemotherapy were assigned to group N. Propofol was administered through an effect-site target-controlled infusion, and the (MOAA/S) score and Bispectral Index (BIS) were recorded. When the plasma concentration and Ce were equal to the target Ce, and if the MOAA/S score did not change, the target Ce was increased by 0.2 μg/ml; otherwise, the Ce was maintained for 2 min and then increased. This process was repeated until the MOAA/S score became 0. Results: No significant differences were observed in Ce values at each sedation level between both groups. Ce values for loss of consciousness (LOC) of groups C and N were 2.76 ± 0.29 and 2.67 ± 0.27 μg/ml (P = 0.285), respectively. However, the BIS value at LOC of group C (63.87 ± 7.04) was lower than that (68.44 ± 6.01) of group N (P = 0.018).Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer has no effect on the Ce of propofol for sedation.

Forced-air warming is commonly utilized to prevent perioperative hypothermia. Underbody warming blankets are often employed to secure a larger area for patient warming. While forced-air warming systems are generally regarded as safe, improper usage poses a risk of cutaneous complications. Additionally, the influence of underbody blankets on cutaneous complications remains uncertain. We present a case of cutaneous complications resulting from the improper utilization of a forced-air warming device and an underbody blanket. A 79-year-old man presented to the hospital for robotic proctectomy under general anesthesia. The surgery lasted for 7 hours, and the forced-air warming device with underbody blanket operated continuously for 5 hours intraoperatively. The surgery was completed without any incidents. However, first-degree burns on the patient’s back, along with superficial decubitus ulcers on his right scapula, were observed after surgery. To prevent cutaneous complications, clinicians must adhere to the manufacturer's guidelines when utilizing a forced-air warming system. Compared to overbody blankets, underbody blankets have limitations in monitoring cutaneous responses. Ensuring patient safety requires selecting an appropriate blanket for scheduled operations.

Background: Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) is a rare genetic disorder where catecholamine causes bidirectional ventricular tachycardia, potentially leading to cardiac arrest. In patients undergoing surgery, sympathetic responses can be triggered in situations associated with surgical stimulations as well as high anxiety before the surgery, anesthetic maneuvers such as endotracheal intubation and extubation, and postoperative pain. Therefore, planning for surgery demands meticulous attention to anesthesia during the perioperative period in order to prevent potentially life-threatening arrhythmias. Case: We discuss a case of an 11-year-old male pediatric patient with known CPVT who required elective strabismus surgery for exotropia involving both eyes. After thorough planning of general anesthesia to minimize catecholamine response, sufficient anesthesia and analgesia were achieved to blunt the stressful response during intubation and maintained throughout the surgical procedure. Complete emergence was achieved after deep extubation, and the patient did not complain of pain or postoperative nausea and vomiting. Conclusions: Anesthesiologists should not only be able to plan and manage the catecholamine response during surgery but also anticipate and be prepared for situations that may lead to arrhythmias before and after the procedure. In certain cases, deep extubation can be beneficial as it reduces hemodynamic changes during the extubation process.