Valentin Nikolaevich Pavlov

Dr. Valentin Nikolaevich Pavlov

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

46Years (1981-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 May 2017 in Journal of Pineal Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FYFan Yang
Fan Yang
LYLei Yang
Lei Yang
YLYuan Li
Yuan Li
LYLei Yang
Lei Yang
CFChao Feng
Chao Feng
BCBenzhi Cai
Benzhi Cai

1 August 2022 in Seminars in Cancer Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAferin Beilerli
Aferin Beilerli
Ilgiz GareevIlgiz Gareev
Ilgiz Gareev
OBOzal Beylerli
Ozal Beylerli
GYGuang Yang
Guang Yang
VPValentin Nikolaevich Pavlov
Valentin Nikolaevich Pavlov
AAAamir Ahmad
Aamir Ahmad

30 August 2017 in Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YYYe Yuan
Ye Yuan
LYLei Yang
Lei Yang
RGRui Gong
Rui Gong
LZLai Zhang
Lai Zhang
TLTianyi Liu
Tianyi Liu
LYLei Yang
Lei Yang
Background/Aims: Blue light emitting diodes (LEDs) have been proven to affect the growth of several types of cells. The effects of blue LEDs have not been tested on bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs), which are important for cell-based therapy in various medical fields. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effects of blue LED on the proliferation, apoptosis and osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs. Methods: BMSCs were irradiated with a blue LED light at 470 nm for 1 min, 5 min, 10 min, 30 min and 60 min or not irradiated. Cell proliferation was measured by performing cell counting and EdU staining assays. Cell apoptosis was detected by TUNEL staining. Osteogenic differentiation was evaluated by ALP and ARS staining. DCFH-DA staining and γ-H2A.X immunostaining were used to measure intracellular levels of ROS production and DNA damage. Results: Both cell counting and EdU staining assays showed that cell proliferation of BMSCs was significantly reduced upon blue LED irradiation. Furthermore, treatment of BMSCs with LED irradiation was followed by a remarkable increase in apoptosis, indicating that blue LED light induced toxic effects on BMSCs. Likewise, BMSC osteogenic differentiation was inhibited after exposure to blue LED irradiation. Further, blue LED irradiation was followed by the accumulation of ROS production and DNA damage. Conclusions: Taken together, our study demonstrated that blue LED light inhibited cell proliferation, inhibited osteogenic differentiation, and induced apoptosis in BMSCs, which are associated with increased ROS production and DNA damage. These findings may provide important insights for the application of LEDs in future BMSC-based therapies.

1 October 2018 in The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LYLei Yang
Lei Yang
LZLai Zhang
Lai Zhang
CFChao Feng
Chao Feng
RGRui Gong
Rui Gong
EIElina Idiiatullina
Elina Idiiatullina
LYLei Yang
Lei Yang

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GRGuzel Альбертовна Rafikova
Guzel Альбертовна Rafikova
IGIrina R. Gilyasova
Irina R. Gilyasova
KEKadriia Ildarovna Enikeeva
Kadriia Ildarovna Enikeeva
VPValentin Nikolaevich Pavlov
Valentin Nikolaevich Pavlov
Julia KzhyshkowskaJulia Kzhyshkowska
Julia Kzhyshkowska
Epidemiological data highlight prostate cancer as a significant global health issue, with high incidence and substantial impact on patients’ quality of life. The prevalence of this disease is associated with various factors, including age, heredity, and race. Recent research in prostate cancer genetics has identified several genetic variants that may be associated with an increased risk of developing the disease. However, despite the significance of these findings, genetic markers for prostate cancer are not currently utilized in clinical practice as reliable indicators of the disease. In addition to genetics, epigenetic alterations also play a crucial role in prostate cancer development. Aberrant DNA methylation, changes in chromatin structure, and microRNA (miRNA) expression are major epigenetic events that influence oncogenesis. Existing markers for prostate cancer, such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA), have limitations in terms of sensitivity and specificity. The cost of testing, follow-up procedures, and treatment for false-positive results and overdiagnosis contributes to the overall healthcare expenditure. Improving the effectiveness of prostate cancer diagnosis and prognosis requires either narrowing the risk group by identifying new genetic factors or enhancing the sensitivity and specificity of existing markers. Immunological biomarkers (both circulating and intra-tumoral), including markers of immune response and immune dysfunction, represent a potentially useful area of research for enhancing the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer. Our review emphasizes the need for developing novel immunological biomarkers to improve the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of prostate cancer. We highlight the most recent achievements in the identification of biomarkers provided by circulating monocytes and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). We highlight that monocyte-derived and TAM-derived biomarkers can enable to establish the missing links between genetic predisposition, hormonal metabolism and immune responses in prostate cancer.

15 January 2018 in Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YJYanan Jiang
Yanan Jiang
WDWeijie Du
Weijie Du
QCQun Chu
Qun Chu
YQYing Qin
Ying Qin
GTGulnara Tuguzbaeva
Gulnara Tuguzbaeva
YBYunlong Bai
Yunlong Bai
Background/Aims: Arsenic trioxide (ATO) is a known anti-acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) reagent, whose clinical applications are limited by its serious cardiac toxicity and fatal adverse effects, such as sudden cardiac death resulting from long QT syndrome (LQTS). The mechanisms of cardiac arrhythmia due to ATO exposure still need to be elucidated. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are emerging as major regulators of various pathophysiological processes. This study aimed to explore the involvement of lncRNAs in ATO-induced LQTS in vivo and in vitro. Methods: For in vivo experiments, mice were administered ATO through the tail vein. For in vitro experiments, ATO was added to the culture medium of primary cultured neonatal mouse cardiomyocytes. To evaluate the effect of lncRNA Kcnq1ot1, siRNA and lentivirus-shRNA were synthesized to knockdown lncRNA Kcnq1ot1. Results: After ATO treatment, the Kcnq1ot1 and Kcnq1 expression levels were down regulated. lncRNA Kcnq1ot1 knockdown prolonged the action potential duration (APD) in vitro and exerted LQTS in vivo. Correspondingly, Kcnq1 expression was decreased after silencing lncRNA Kcnq1ot1. However, the knockdown of Kcnq1 exerted no effect on lncRNA Kcnq1ot1 expression. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this report is the first to demonstrate that lncRNA Kcnq1ot1 downregulation is responsible for QT interval prolongation induced by ATO at least partially by repressing Kcnq1 expression. lncRNA Kcnq1ot1 has important pathophysiological functions in the heart and could become a novel antiarrhythmic target.