Proton pencil-beam scanning (PBS) Bragg peak FLASH combines ultra-high dose rate delivery and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing. This proof-of-principle study compared dosimetry and dose rate coverage between PBS Bragg peak FLASH and PBS transmission FLASH in head and neck reirradiation. PBS Bragg peak FLASH plans were created via the highest beam single energy, range shifter, and range compensator, and were compared to PBS transmission FLASH plans for 6 GyE/fraction and 10 GyE/fraction in eight recurrent head and neck patients originally treated with quad shot reirradiation (14.8/3.7 CGE). The 6 GyE/fraction and 10 GyE/fraction plans were also created using conventional-rate intensity-modulated proton therapy techniques. PBS Bragg peak FLASH, PBS transmission FLASH, and conventional plans were compared for OAR sparing, FLASH dose rate coverage, and target coverage. All FLASH OAR V40 Gy/s dose rate coverage was 90–100% at 6 GyE and 10 GyE for both FLASH modalities. PBS Bragg peak FLASH generated dose volume histograms (DVHs) like those of conventional therapy and demonstrated improved OAR dose sparing over PBS transmission FLASH. All the modalities had similar CTV coverage. PBS Bragg peak FLASH can deliver conformal, ultra-high dose rate FLASH with a two-millisecond delivery of the minimum MU per spot. PBS Bragg peak FLASH demonstrated similar dose rate coverage to PBS transmission FLASH with improved OAR dose-sparing, which was more pronounced in the 10 GyE/fraction than in the 6 GyE/fraction. This feasibility study generates hypotheses for the benefits of FLASH in head and neck reirradiation and developing biological models.

Review Article on Radiotherapy for Oncologic Emergencies Palliative radiotherapy for hepatic tumors: a narrative review of indications and recommendations Michael Pennock, Jonathan Klein, Michael Lock

For most locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) patients who complete definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and do not experience disease progression, one year of adjuvant durvalumab is recommended. Here, we explore causes and consequences of early durvalumab discontinuation. We reviewed patients treated for LA-NSCLC with definitive CRT who began adjuvant durvalumab between 2017 and 2021. Duration of durvalumab receipt and causes for early discontinuation were tabulated. Logistic regression models were utilized to evaluate predictors of early durvalumab discontinuation. Landmark analyses were performed to explore associations between early durvalumab discontinuation and clinical outcomes (progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS)). Fifty-nine patients were included. Forty-one patients (69%) discontinued durvalumab early, most commonly for disease progression (n = 14) or lung toxicity (n = 10). Multivariable analysis revealed mean heart radiotherapy dose (MHD) was associated with risk of durvalumab discontinuation from progression (HR = 2.34 per 10 Gy, p = 0.052), and there was a trend suggesting an association between MHD and risk of durvalumab discontinuation from lung toxicity (HR = 2.16 per 10 Gy, p = 0.126). Median PFS duration following durvalumab initiation was 14 months, and median OS duration was 32 months. Landmark analyses that excluded patients with progression or death within one year of durvalumab initiation demonstrated improved outcomes for patients who completed one year of durvalumab (2-year PFS 100% v. 40%, p < 0.001; 2-year OS 100% v. 67%, p = 0.862). Improved outcomes were observed for patients who received MHD below the cohort median (9.3 Gy) compared to patients with higher MHD (median PFS 32 months v. 8 months, p < 0.001; 2-year OS 69% v. 44%, p = 0.088). For LA-NSCLC patients treated with CRT followed by immunotherapy, extent of cardiac irradiation may be a risk factor for immunotherapy discontinuation, disease recurrence, and death.