Background: Previous studies have indicated that quantitative MRI (qMR) is beneficial for diagnosis of breast cancer. As a novel qMR technology, synthetic MRI (syMRI) may be advantageous by offering simultaneous generation of T1 and T2 mapping in one scan within a few minutes and without concern to the deposition of the gadolinium contrast agent in cell nucleus. In this study, the potential of quantitative mapping derived from Synthetic MRI (SyMRI) to diagnose breast cancer was investigated. Methods: From April 2018 to May 2019, a total of 87 patients with suspicious breast lesions underwent both conventional and SyMRI before treatment. The quantitative metrics derived from SyMRI, including T1 and T2 values, were measured in breast lesions. The diagnostic performance of SyMRI was evaluated with unpaired Student’s t-tests, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis. The AUCs of quantitative values were compared using Delong test. Results: Among 77 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 48 were diagnosed with histopathological confirmed breast cancers, and the rest had benign lesions. The breast cancers showed significantly higher T1 (1611.61 ± 215.88 ms) values and lower T2 (80.93 ± 7.51 ms) values than benign lesions. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) values were 0.931 (95% CI: 0.874–0.989) and 0.883 (95% CI: 0.810–0.956) for T1 and T2 maps, respectively, in diagnostic discrimination between breast cancers and benign lesions. A slightly increased AUC of 0.978 (95% CI: 0.915–0.993) was achieved by combining those two relaxation-based quantitative metrics. Conclusion: In conclusion, our preliminary study showed that the quantitative T1 and T2 values obtained by SyMRI could distinguish effectively between benign and malignant breast lesions, and T1 relaxation time showed the highest diagnostic efficiency. Furthermore, combining the two quantitative relaxation metrics further improved their diagnostic performance.

Objectives: To determine the values of quantitative metrics derived from synthetic MRI (SyMRI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in evaluating the prognostic factors of cervical carcinoma (CC). Methods: In this prospective study, 74 patients with pathologically confirmed CC were enrolled. Pretreatment quantitative metrics including T1, T2 and ADC values were obtained from SyMRI and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences. The values of all metrics were compared for different prognostic features using Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and multivariate logistic regression analysis were utilized to evaluate the diagnostic performance of quantitative variables. Results: T1 and T2 values of parametrial involvement (PMI)-negative were significantly higher than those of PMI-positive (p = 0.002 and < 0.001), while ADC values did not show a significant difference. The area under curve (AUC) of T1 and T2 values for identifying PMI were 0.743 and 0.831. Only the T2 values showed a significant difference between the lymphovascular space involvement (LVSI)-negative and LVSI-positive (p < 0.001), and the AUC of T2 values for discriminating LVSI was 0.814. The differences of T1, T2, and ADC values between the well/moderately and the poorly differentiated CC were significant (all p < 0.001). The AUCs of T1, T2 and ADC values for predicting differentiation grades were 0.762, 0.830, and 0.808. The combined model of all metrics proved to achieve good diagnostic performance with the AUC of 0.866. Conclusion: SyMRI may be a potential noninvasive tool for assessing the prognostic factors such as PMI, LVSI, and differentiation grades in CC. Moreover, the overall diagnostic performances of synthetic quantitative metrics were superior to the ADC values, especially in identifying PMI and LVSI. Advances in knowledge: This is the first study to assess the utility of SyMRI-derived parameters and ADC value in evaluating the prognostic factors in CC.