Liyun HE

Liyun HE


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

22 June 2011 in Frontiers of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LHLiyun HE
Liyun HE
TWTiancai Wen
Tiancai Wen
SYShiyan Yan
Shiyan Yan
RLRunjin Li
Runjin Li
ZLZufa Liu
Zufa Liu
JLJian Liu
Jian Liu

19 April 2017 in Frontiers of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XYXingyue Yang
Xingyue Yang
YLYali Liu
Yali Liu
AHAijuan Hou
Aijuan Hou
YYYang Yang
Yang Yang
XTXin Tian
Xin Tian
LHLiyun HE
Liyun HE


30 October 2013 in Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YZYu-Feng Zhao
Yu-Feng Zhao
LHLiyun HE
Liyun HE
BLBao-Yan Liu
Bao-Yan Liu
JLJun Li
Jun Li
FLFeng-Yi Li
Feng-Yi Li
XJXiang-Hong Jing
Xiang-Hong Jing

22 January 2018 in Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XYXingyue Yang
Xingyue Yang
XTXin Tian
Xin Tian
YZYannan Zhou
Yannan Zhou
YLYali Liu
Yali Liu
XLXinlong Li
Xinlong Li
LHLiyun HE
Liyun HE
Background. Daodi medicinal material is widely used in Chinese herb medication. However, there is a lack of systematic methodology for identifying characteristics associated with good quality and reliable efficacy of Daodi med‐material. Purpose. The purpose of this study is to provide some evidence to further substantiate the use of Daodi medicinal materials. Methods. Seven relevant databases were searched before July 2014. Two evaluators were responsible for screening and categorizing the results. The data was analyzed with Microsoft Excel 2007 and SPSS 21.0 statistical software. Results. Overall, 107 articles were systematically analyzed. Of these studies, 55.1% (59/107) focused on the methodology to assess Daodi med‐material, and 38.3% (41/107) were interested in med‐material ingredients, soil physical and chemical properties, and the geological background system (GBS). Only 6.5% (7/107) of studies were mainly conducted as clinical trials and animal experiments. Conclusion. Comparisons between Daodi and non‐Daodi materials have been studied mainly in terms of the ingredients or composition of medical materials, soil physics and chemistry, and the GBS, and some identifying methodologies have been created to identify Daodi attributes. Until now, there is still no consensus of comparison criteria between Daodi and non‐Daodi medicinal material. Only a few studies were conducted through animal experiments and clinical trials to determine Daodi superiority.