Ke-Shi Zhang

Dr. Ke-Shi Zhang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 January 2023 in Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KWKai Wang
Kai Wang
Zhonghua HanZhonghua Han
Zhonghua Han
KZKe-Shi Zhang
Ke-Shi Zhang
WSWen-Ping Song
Wen-Ping Song
Handling a large number of geometric constraints brings a big challenge to the surrogate-based aerodynamic shape optimization (ASO) driven by computational fluid dynamics (CFD). It is not feasible to calculate the geometric constraint functions directly during the sub-optimization of a surrogate-based optimization, as the geometric constraint functions are to be evaluated thousands of times for each updating cycle and the total cost of a number of cycles can be prohibitive. This article proposes an efficient method of handling geometric constraints within the framework of a surrogate-based optimization to address this problem. The core idea is to use the Kreisselmeier-Steinhauser (KS) method to aggregate all geometric constraints into one that can be approximated by a cheap surrogate model, in order to avoid the large computational cost associated with tremendous calculation of geometric constraint values. The proposed method is verified by an analytical test case. Then, the proposed method is demonstrated and compared with the methods of building surrogate models of all geometric constraints and calculating all geometric constraints directly during each sub-optimization by drag minimizations of NACA0012 air foil and ONERA M6 wing in transonic flows. To investigate the ability of the proposed method for handling various geometric constraints, drag minimization of CRM wing in viscous transonic flow driven by CFD is performed. Results show that the proposed method can dramatically improve the optimization efficiency of ASO with the number of geometric constraints ranging from 15 to 1429 and the number of types of geometric constraints up to 3, which offers great potential for handling a larger number and more types of geometric constraints.

21 August 2023 in Aerospace
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WKWang Kai
Wang Kai
Zhonghua HanZhonghua Han
Zhonghua Han
KZKe-Shi Zhang
Ke-Shi Zhang
WSWenping Song
Wenping Song
Most existing aerodynamic shape optimization (ASO) studies do not take the balanced pitching moment into account and thus the optimized configuration has to be trimmed to ensure zero pitching moment, which causes additional drag and reduces the benefit of ASO remarkably. This article proposes an efficient global ASO method that directly enforces a zero pitching moment constraint. A free-form deformation (FFD) parameterization combing Laplacian smoothing method is implemented to parameterize a full aircraft configuration and ensure sufficiently smooth aerodynamic shapes. Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations are solved to simulate transonic viscous flows. A surrogate-based multi-round optimization strategy is used to drive ASO towards the global optimum. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, we adopt two design optimization strategies for the NASA Common Research Model (CRM) wing–body–tail configuration. The first strategy is to optimize the configuration without considering balance of pitching moment, and then manually trim the optimized configuration by deflecting the horizontal tail. The second one is to directly enforce the zero pitching moment constraint in the optimization model and take the deflection angle of the horizontal tail as an additional design variable. Results show that: (1) for the first strategy, about 4-count drag-reducing benefits would be lost when manually trimming the optimal configuration; (2) the second strategy can achieve 3.2-count more drag-reducing benefits than the first strategy; (3) compared with gradient-based optimization (GBO), surrogate-based optimization (SBO) is more efficient than GBO for ASO problems with around 80 design variables, and the benefit of ASO achieved by SBO is comparable to that obtained by GBO.

31 August 2022
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
PLPei-Xia Lu
Pei-Xia Lu
KZKe-Shi Zhang
Ke-Shi Zhang
PWPeng-Hui Wang
Peng-Hui Wang

5 July 2024
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
YDYouquan Du
Youquan Du
KZKe-Shi Zhang
Ke-Shi Zhang
PLPeixia Lu
Peixia Lu
ZHZhonghua Han
Zhonghua Han