Benchmarking is crucial for healthcare providers to enhance quality and efficiency, notably for complex conditions like sarcomas. Multidisciplinary teams/sarcoma boards (MDT/SBs) are vital in sarcoma management, but differences in their processes can affect patient outcomes and treatment costs, despite adherence to international guidelines. To address this issue, this study aimed to compare two MDT/SBs and establish an interoperable digital platform, Sarconnector^®, for real-time-world data assessment and automated analysis. The study included 983 patients, 46.0% of whom female, with a median age of 58 years, and 4.5% of patients presented with metastasis at diagnosis. Differences were observed in the number of first-time presentations, follow-up presentations, primary sarcomas, biopsies and chemotherapy indications between the two MDT/SB. The results highlight the importance of benchmarking and utilizing a harmonized data approach, such as the RWT approach provided by the Sarconnector^®, to standardize and evaluate quality and cost metrics. By identifying areas of improvement and making data-driven decisions on the meta-level, healthcare providers can optimize resources and improve patient outcomes. In conclusion, benchmarking with the RWT harmonized data approach provided by the Sarconnector^® can help healthcare providers improve the overall effectiveness of the healthcare system and achieve better outcomes for their patients in terms of both outcomes and costs.

Sarcomas, rare and with lower survival rates than common tumors, offer insights into healthcare efficiency via the analysis of the total interval of the diagnostic pathway, combining the patient interval (time between the first symptom and visit with a physician) and diagnostic interval (time between first physician visit and histological diagnosis). Switzerland’s healthcare system, Europe’s costliest, lacks research on treating rare conditions, like mesenchymal tumors. This study examines the total interval of the diagnostic pathway for optimization strategies. Analyzing a dataset of 1028 patients presented from 2018 to 2021 to the Swiss Sarcoma Board (MDT/SB-SSN), this retrospective analysis delves into bone sarcoma (BS), soft-tissue sarcoma (STS), and their benign counterparts. Demographic and treatment data were extracted from medical records. The patient interval accounted for the largest proportion of the total interval and secondary care interval for the largest proportion of the diagnostic interval. Age, grade, and localization could be elicited as influencing factors of the length of different components of the total interval. An increasing age and tumor size, as well as the axial localization, could be elicited as factors increasing the probability of sarcoma. The patient and secondary care interval (SCI) offer the greatest potential for optimization, with SCI being the bottleneck of the diagnostic interval. New organizational structures for care work-ups are needed, such as integrated practice units (IPU) as integral part of value-based healthcare (VBHC).

Sarcomas are rare mesenchymal tumors with significant heterogeneity, encompassing both bone and soft tissue neoplasms that can range from benign to malignant and from superficial to deep-seated lesions