Stephen J. Kron

Prof. Stephen J. Kron

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

46Years (1981-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 1986 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SKStephen J. Kron
Stephen J. Kron
JSJ A Spudich
J A Spudich
Single actin filaments stabilized with fluorescent phalloidin exhibit ATP-dependent movement on myosin filaments fixed to a surface. At pH 7.4 and 24 degrees C, the rates of movement average 3-4 micron/s with skeletal muscle myosin and 1-2 micron/s with Dictyostelium myosin. These rates are very similar to those measured in our previous myosin movement assays. The rates of movement are relatively independent of the type of actin used. The filament velocity shows a broad pH optimum between 7.0 and 9.0, and the concentration of ATP required for half-maximal velocity is 50 microM. Evidence was obtained to suggest that movement of actin over myosin requires at most the number of heads in a single thick filament. This system provides a practical, quantitative myosin-movement assay with purified proteins.

1 March 2002 in Nature Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BHBenjamin T. Houseman
Benjamin T. Houseman
JHJoon H. Huh
Joon H. Huh
SKStephen J. Kron
Stephen J. Kron
MMMilan Mrksich
Milan Mrksich

1 December 2004 in Molecular Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JDJessica A. Downs
Jessica A. Downs
SAStéphane Allard
Stéphane Allard
OJOlivier Jobin-Robitaille
Olivier Jobin-Robitaille
AJAli Javaheri
Ali Javaheri
AAAndréanne Auger
Andréanne Auger
Jacques CôtéJacques Côté
Jacques Côté

1 August 1987 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YTYoko Yano Toyoshima
Yoko Yano Toyoshima
SKStephen J. Kron
Stephen J. Kron
EMElizabeth M. McNally
Elizabeth M. McNally
KNKenneth R. Niebling
Kenneth R. Niebling
CTChikashi Toyoshima
Chikashi Toyoshima
JSJames A. Spudich
James A. Spudich

1 August 1990 in Journal of Molecular Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TUTaro Q.P. Uyeda
Taro Q.P. Uyeda
SKStephen J. Kron
Stephen J. Kron
JSJames A. Spudich
James A. Spudich
We have estimated the step size of the myosin cross-bridge (d, displacement of an actin filament per one ATP hydrolysis) in an in vitro motility assay system by measuring the velocity of slowly moving actin filaments over low densities of heavy meromyosin on a nitrocellulose surface. In previous studies, only filaments greater than a minimum length were observed to undergo continuous sliding movement. These filaments moved at the maximum speed (Vo), while shorter filaments dissociated from the surface. We have now modified the assay system by including 0.8% methylcellulose in the ATP solution. Under these conditions, filaments shorter than the previous minimum length move, but significantly slower than Vo, as they are propelled by a limited number of myosin heads. These data are consistent with a model that predicts that the sliding velocity (v) of slowly moving filaments is determined by the product of vo and the fraction of time when at least one myosin head is propelling the filament, that is, v = vo [1-(1-ts/tc)N], where ts is the time the head is strongly bound to actin, tc is the cycle time of ATP hydrolysis, and N is the average number of myosin heads that can interact with the filament. Using this equation, the optimum value of ts/tc to fit the measured relationship between v and N was calculated to be 0.050. Assuming d = vots, the step size was then calculated to be between 10nm and 28 nm per ATP hydrolyzed, the latter value representing the upper limit. This range is within that of geometric constraint for conformational change imposed by the size of the myosin head, and therefore is not inconsistent with the swinging cross-bridge model tightly coupled with ATP hydrolysis.

1 April 2021 in JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PPPataje G Prasanna
Pataje G Prasanna
DCDeborah E Citrin
Deborah E Citrin
JHJeffrey Hildesheim
Jeffrey Hildesheim
MAMansoor M Ahmed
Mansoor M Ahmed
SVSundar Venkatachalam
Sundar Venkatachalam
CCC Norman Coleman
C Norman Coleman
Cellular senescence is an essential tumor suppressive mechanism that prevents the propagation of oncogenically activated, genetically unstable, and/or damaged cells. Induction of tumor cell senescence is also one of the underlying mechanisms by which cancer therapies exert antitumor activity. However, an increasing body of evidence from preclinical studies demonstrates that radiation and chemotherapy cause accumulation of senescent cells (SnCs) both in tumor and normal tissue. SnCs in tumors can, paradoxically, promote tumor relapse, metastasis, and resistance to therapy, in part, through expression of the senescence-associated secretory phenotype. In addition, SnCs in normal tissue can contribute to certain radiation- and chemotherapy-induced side effects. Because of its multiple roles, cellular senescence could serve as an important target in the fight against cancer. This commentary provides a summary of the discussion at the National Cancer Institute Workshop on Radiation, Senescence, and Cancer (August 10-11, 2020, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD) regarding the current status of senescence research, heterogeneity of therapy-induced senescence, current status of senotherapeutics and molecular biomarkers, a concept of “one-two punch” cancer therapy (consisting of therapeutics to induce tumor cell senescence followed by selective clearance of SnCs), and its integration with personalized adaptive tumor therapy. It also identifies key knowledge gaps and outlines future directions in this emerging field to improve treatment outcomes for cancer patients.