Li Xu

Li Xu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YGYao Guan
Yao Guan
YCYuxi Chen
Yuxi Chen
XSXiaoming Sun
Xiaoming Sun
LXLi Xu
Li Xu
DXDong Xu
Dong Xu
WHWentao He
Wentao He
In this study, we analyzed the clay mineralogy and geochemistry of surface and drill core samples from the northeastern Beibu Gulf in order to unravel the sediment provenance of, and factors controlling, the sedimentary environment. The main clay mineral assemblage in the surface sediment samples included kaolinite (27–72%), smectite (4–51%), illite (7–20%), and chlorite (8–17%). The study area comprises three major clay distribution zones (from the northeastern coastal area to central Beibu Gulf basin), i.e., the kaolinite-dominated, kaolinite–smectite, and smectite-dominated zones. The zoning of the clay mineralogy and major and trace elements indicated the mixing of coarse terrigenous sediments with distal fine sediments. Early Holocene sea level rise was documented in core B15-1, which had three sedimentary units (divided into Units 1–3 from top to bottom), as revealed by the changes in the dominant clay minerals and geochemical/oxide ratios (SiO2/Al2O3, Rb/Sr, Sr/Ba, and Ti/Ca) in Unit 2. Unit 1 and Unit 3 were likely deposited in the continental and marine environments, respectively. The low sedimentation rate and hydrodynamic disturbance may have influenced the deposition process more than climatic fluctuations.

1 December 2022 in Ore Geology Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ZDZhengpeng Ding
Zhengpeng Ding
XSXiaoming Sun
Xiaoming Sun
SHSiyu Hu
Siyu Hu
HCHongjun Chen
Hongjun Chen
DLDengfeng Li
Dengfeng Li
FHFei Huang
Fei Huang

7 November 2018 in Minerals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YWYan Wang
Yan Wang
ZWZhongwei Wu
Zhongwei Wu
XSXiaoming Sun
Xiaoming Sun
XDXiguang Deng
Xiguang Deng
YGYao Guan
Yao Guan
KCKaijun Cao
Kaijun Cao
Noble gases have become a powerful tool to constrain the origin and evolution of ore-forming fluids in seafloor hydrothermal systems. The aim of this study was to apply these tracers to understand the genesis of newly discovered polymetallic sulphide deposits along the ultraslow-spreading Southwest Indian Ridge (SWIR). The helium, argon, and sulphur isotope compositions of metal sulphide minerals were measured for a number of active/inactive vent fields in the Indian Ocean. The helium concentrations and isotopic ratios in these ore samples are variable (4He: 0.09–2.42 × 10−8 cm3STP∙g−1; 3He: 0.06–3.28 × 10−13 cm3STP∙g−1; 3He/4He: 1.12–9.67 Ra) and generally greater than the modern atmosphere, but significantly lower than those in massive sulphides from the fast-spreading East Pacific Rise (EPR), especially for three Cu–Fe-rich samples from the ultramafic-hosted Tianzuo and Kairei vent fields. On the contrary, most of the SWIR sulphide deposits have somewhat higher 40Ar/36Ar ratios of trapped fluids (ranging from 290.6 to 303.4) when compared to the EPR ore samples. Moreover, the majority of sulphide minerals from the Indian Ocean have much higher δ34S values (3.0‰–9.8‰, ~5.9 on average, n = 49) than other basaltic-hosted active hydrothermal systems on the EPR. Overall, these He–Ar–S results are well within the range of seafloor massive sulphide deposits at global sediment-starved mid-ocean ridges (MORs), lying between those of air-saturated water (ASW) and mid-ocean ridge basalt (MORB) end members. Therefore, our study suggests that the helium was derived mainly from the MORB mantle by degassing during the high-temperature stage of hydrothermal activity, as well as from a mixture of vent fluids with variable amounts of ambient seawater during either earlier or late-stage low-temperature hydrothermal episodes, whereas the argon in ore-forming fluids trapped within sulphide minerals was predominantly derived from deep-sea water. Additionally, relatively high δ34S values exhibit a great estimated proportion (up to nearly 40%) of seawater-derived components. In summary, sub-seafloor extensive fluid circulation, pervasive low-temperature alteration, shallow seawater entrainment, and mixing processes, may make a larger contribution to the SWIR hydrothermal ore-forming systems, compared to fast-spreading centres.

22 June 2023 in Minerals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YWYan Wang
Yan Wang
ZWZhongwei Wu
Zhongwei Wu
YHYi Huang
Yi Huang
XSXiaoming Sun
Xiaoming Sun
JYJinhui Yan
Jinhui Yan
LXLi Xu
Li Xu
Submarine hydrothermal sulfides from the ultraslow-spreading Southwest Indian Ridge (SWIR) were sampled from three hydrothermal fields, and the Fe-Cu-Zn isotopic compositions were analyzed in this study. The Fe isotopes ranged from −0.011‰ to −1.333‰. We believe the processes controlling the Fe isotope variability in the hydrothermal systems include the sulfide precipitation process, the initial isotopic composition of the hydrothermal fluid, and the temperature during precipitation. Among these factors, the sulfide precipitation process is the dominant one. The Cu isotope compositions of the sulfides varied from −0.364‰ to 0.892‰, indicating that the hydrothermal fluid preferentially leached 65Cu in the early stages and that hydrothermal reworking led to decreases in the Cu isotopes in the later stages. In addition, because mass fractionation occurred during sulfide precipitation, the Zn isotope variations ranged from −0.060‰ to 0.422‰. Combined with the S isotopic compositions, these results also implied that different Fe-Cu-Zn isotopic fractionation mechanisms prevailed for the different sample types. Based on these results, we are sure that the metallic elements, including Fe, Cu, and Zn, were derived from the mantle in the SWIR hydrothermal field, and the Fe-Cu isotope results indicated that these metallic elements were provided by fluid leaching processes. Using the isotopic fractionation and sulfide results, we calculated that the Fe-Cu-Zn isotopic compositions of the hydrothermal fluid in this field were δ56Fe(fluid): −0.8~0.0‰; δ65Cu(fluid): 0.3~1.3‰; and δ66Zn(fluid): 0~0.48‰.