This article studies the properties of the maximum likelihood estimator of the population proportion in ranked set sampling with extreme ranks. The maximum likelihood estimator is described and its asymptotic distribution is derived. Finite sample size properties of the estimator are investigated using simulation studies. It turns out that the proposed estimator is substantially more efficient than its simple random sampling and ranked set sampling analogs, as the true population proportion tends to zero/unity. The method is illustrated using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

In this paper, we consider the problem of estimating the population proportion in pair ranked set sampling design. An unbiased estimator for the population proportion is proposed, and its theoretical properties are studied. It is shown that the estimator is more (less) efficient than its counterpart in simple random sampling (ranked set sampling). Asymptotic normality of the estimator is also established. Application of the suggested procedure is illustrated using a data set from an environmental study.

Rank-based sampling methods are applicable in settings where precise measurements are expensive, but small sets of units can be accurately ranked at negligible cost. This article introduces one such a design, called multistage pair ranked set sampling. It mitigates ranking burden associated with a competitor scheme, namely multistage ranked set sampling. The mean estimator in multistage pair ranked set sampling is unbiased, and under perfect rankings has variance no larger than its simple random sampling counterpart. Although the suggested mean estimator is outperformed by its multistage ranked set sampling analog in terms of precision under perfect rankings, the situation may be reversed if cost considerations are taken into account. The methodology is illustrated using a medical dataset.